Hip & pelvis

The Korean Hip Society (대한고관절학회)
권호 표지

Acetabular Revision Using Uncemented Acetabular Cup

무시멘트형 비구컵을 이용한 비구 재치환술

  • Kim, Yee-Suk (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kim, Young-Ho (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University, Guri Hospital) ;
  • Park, Kee-Cheol (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University, Guri Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Chang-Hoon (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University) ;
  • Choi, Il-Yong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanyang University)
  • 김이석 (한양대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 김영호 (한양대학교 의과대학 구리병원 정형외과) ;
  • 박기철 (한양대학교 의과대학 구리병원 정형외과) ;
  • 이창훈 (한양대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 최일용 (한양대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Published : 2009.03.31

⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of revision total hip arthroplasty with using impacted bone grafts and uncemented acetabular cups on the acetabulum with bone defects. Materials and Methods: From June 1990 to March 2006, 131 revision total hip arthroplasties using an uncemented acetabular cup and impacted bone graft, were performed in 124 patients. The average follow-up period was 66 months. The clinical results were evaluated with the Harris hip score. The radiological results included the period of graft incorporation, the rate of resorption, the migration and the change of inclination of the cup. The failure rate and 13 year survival rate were analyzed. Results: The Harris hip scores were 51.8 preoperatively and 82.5 postoperatively. The period of incorporation was a mean of 6.38 month. Most cases showed a resorption rate below 10%. The mean migrations of the acetabular cup were 1.37 mm superiorly and 1.20 mm medially. The mean change of inclination was 1.24􀆆. There were 5 re-revision surgeries. The failure rate was 3.8%. The survival rate of the revision that was done due to loosening was 94.9% at 13 years. Conclusion: Acetabular revision arthroplasty with bone grafts, and an uncemented cup is recommendable as it achieves favorable outcomes in terms of rapid incorporation of the grafted bone and stable fixation of the cup.

목적: 골 결손이 동반된 비구컵 재치환술시 골 이식 및 무시멘트형 비구컵으로 치환한 후 임상적, 방사선학적 결과를 알아보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 1990년 6월부터 2006월 3월까지 무시멘트형 비구컵과 골이식을 이용한 재치환술을 시행하였던 124명 환자, 131개 고관절을 대상으로 하였으며, 평균 추시 기간은 5년 6개월이었다. 임상적 결과로 Harris 고관절 점수를, 방사선학적 결과로 이식골 유합시기, 이식골 흡수율, 비구컵 이동과 경사각 변화를 조사하였으며, 실패율과 생존율 분석을 하였다. 결과: Harris 고관절 점수는 술 전 51.8에서 술 후 82.5로 향상되었다. 이식골의 골유합시기는 평균 6.4 개월이었으며, 방사선 학적 이식골의 흡수는 10% 이하 흡수율이 가장 많았다. 최종 추시시 비구컵의 이동은 상방이동 평균 1.37mm, 내측이동 평균 1.20 mm, 비구컵의 경사각 변화는 평균 1.24도이었다. 5 례에서 재수술이 시행되었다. 실패율은 3.8 %, 비구컵 해리기준 13년 생존율은 94.9%이었다. 결론: 비구골 결손이 동반된 경우 골이식을 함께한 무시멘트 비구컵을 이용한 재치환술은 빠른 이식골의 골결합과 안정적 비구컵을 얻을 수 있어 권장할 만한 술식으로 사료된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bohm P, Banzhaf S: Acetabular revision with allograft bone. 103 revisions with 3 reconstruction alternatives, followed for 0.3-13 years. Acta Orthop Scand, 70: 240-249, 1999. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679908997800
  2. Bozic KJ, Katz P, Cisternas M, Ono L, Ries MD, Showstack J: Hospital resource utilization for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg, 87-A: 570-576, 2005.
  3. Chareancholvanich K, Tanchuling A, Seki T, Gustilo RB: Cementless acetabular revision for aseptic failure of cemented hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 361: 140-149, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199904000-00019
  4. D'Antonio JA, Capello WN, Borden LS, et al.: Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 243: 126-137, 1989.
  5. DeLee JG, Charnley J: Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 121: 20-32, 1976.
  6. Della Valle CJ, Berger RA, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO: Cementless acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 420: 96-100, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200403000-00013
  7. Etienne G, Bezwada HP, Hungerford DS, Mont MA: The incorporation of morselized bone grafts in cementless acetabular revisions. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 428: 241-246, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000145889.94276.61
  8. Garbuz D, Morsi E, Gross AE: Revision of the acetabular component of a total hip arthroplasty with a massive structural allograft. Study with a minimum fiveyear follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg, 78-A: 693-697, 1996.
  9. Goodman SB, Adler SJ, Fyhrie DP, Schurman DJ: The acetabular teardrop and its relevance to acetabular migration. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 236: 199-204, 1988.
  10. Howell GE, Bourne RB: Osteolysis: etiology, prosthetic factors, and pathogenesis. Instr Course Lect, 49: 71-82, 2000.
  11. Jasty M: Jumbo cups and morsalized graft. Orthop Clin North Am, 29: 249-254, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70323-0
  12. Kaplan EL, Meier P: Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc, 53: 457-481, 1958. https://doi.org/10.2307/2281868
  13. Kruger-Franke M, Birk M, Rosemeyer B: Results of cementless acetabular revision surgery. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb, 133: 374-379, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1039811
  14. Lachiewicz PF, Hussamy OD: Revision of the acetabulum without cement with use of the Harris-Galante porous-coated implant. Two to eight-year results. J Bone Joint Surg, 76-A: 1834-1839, 1994.
  15. Lee JM: Revision acetabular reconstruction in total hip arthroplsty. J Korean Hip Soc, 16: 176-182, 2004.
  16. Leopold SS, Rosenberg AG, Bhatt RD, Sheinkop MB, Quigley LR, Galante JO: Cementless acetabular revision. Evaluation at an average of 10.5 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 369: 179-186, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199912000-00019
  17. Lian YY, Yoo MC, Pei FX, Kim KI, Chun SW, Cheng JQ: Cementless hemispheric acetabular component for acetabular revision arthroplasty: a 5-to 19-year followup study. J Arthroplasty, 23: 376-382, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2007.03.018
  18. Padgett DE, Kull L, Rosenberg A, Sumner DR, Galante JO: Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to sixyear follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg, 75-A: 663-673, 1993.
  19. Palm L, Jacobsson SA, Kvist J, Lindholm A, Ojersjo A, Ivarsson I: Acetabular revision with extensive allograft impaction and uncemented hydroxyapatite-coated implants. Results after 9 (7-11) years follow-up. J Arthroplasty, 22: 1083-1091, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.021
  20. Paprosky WG, Bradford MS, Jablonsky WS: Acetabular reconstruction with massive acetabular allografts. Instr Course Lect, 45: 149-159, 1996.
  21. Paprosky WG, Magnus RE: Principles of bone grafting in revision total hip arthroplasty. Acetabular technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 298: 147-155, 1994.
  22. Paprosky WG, Perona PG, Lawrence JM: Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty, 9: 33-44, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-5403(94)90135-X
  23. Rosenberg AG: Cementless acetabular components: the gold standard for socket revision. J Arthroplasty, 18: 118-120, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2003.50108
  24. Shin SH, Kim YM, Yoon KS, et al.: Cementless acetabular revision performed with morselized bone grafts J Korean Hip Soc, 18: 153-159, 2006.
  25. Templeton JE, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC: Revision of a cemented acetabular component to a cementless acetabular component. A ten to fourteen-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg, 83-A: 1706-1711, 2001.
  26. Wilson MG, Nikpoor N, Aliabadi P, Poss R, Weissman BN: The fate of acetabular allografts after bipolar revision arthroplasty of the hip. A radiographic review. J Bone Joint Surg, 71-A: 1469-1479, 1989.
  27. Woodgate IG, Saleh KJ, Jaroszynski G, Agnidis Z, Woodgate MM, Gross AE: Minor column structural acetabular allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 371: 75-85, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200002000-00009
  28. Yoo MC: Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty using structural bone graft. J Korean Hip Soc, 13: 123-130, 2001.