DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

봉합할 수 없는 광범위 회전근 개 파열에 대한 결절 성형술

Tuberoplasty for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears

  • 이진웅 (건양대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 조남수 (경희대학교 동서신의학병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 조승현 (한일병원 정형외과) ;
  • 조형준 (경희대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 이용걸 (경희대학교 의과대학 정형외과학교실)
  • Yi, Jin-Woong (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Konyang University) ;
  • Cho, Nam-Su (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kyung Hee University East-West Neo Medical Center) ;
  • Cho, Seung-Hyun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hanil General Hospital) ;
  • Cho, Hyung-Jun (Shoulder & Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Rhee, Yong-Girl (Shoulder & Elbow Clinic, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, College of Medicine, Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2009.06.15

초록

목적: 봉합할 수 없는 광범위 회전근 개 파열에서 관절경적 결절 성형술 후 임상적, 방사선학적 결과를 분석하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2004년 12월에서 2007년 4월까지 광범위 회전근 개 파열로 관절경적 결절 성형술을 시행한 11예를 대상으로 하였다. 추시 기간은 평균 17.3개월, 평균 연령은 61.7세였다. 5예는 관절경적 결절 성형술을, 6예는 관절경적 견봉하 감압술도 함께 시행하였다. 결과: Constant 점수와 UCLA 점수는 수술 전 각각 평균 61.8점과 14.8점에서 수술 후 평균 86.9점, 31.8점으로 향상되었고, 최우수 6예, 우수 3예, 불량 2예였다(p<0.001, p=0.003). 능동적 전방 거상은 111.8도에서 154.1도로 향상되었다(p=0.011). 견봉상완 간격은 수술 전 평균 3.94 mm에서 수술 후 평균 4.22 mm로 측정되었다(p=0.12). 불량인 2예는 수술 전 견봉상완 간격이 평균 1.67 mm에서 수술 후 0.94 mm로 감소되었다. 결론: 봉합할 수 없는 광범위 회전근 개 파열에서 관절경적 결절 성형술은 통증 완화 및 운동 범위 증가의 효과를 얻었으나, 수술 전 견봉상완 간격이 2 mm 이하이고 술후에 더 좁아진다면 좋은 결과를 기대하기 어렵다.

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical and radiological results of arthroscopic tuberoplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears. Materials and Methods: Eleven patients underwent arthroscopic tuberoplasty for irreparable massive rotator cuff tears between December 2004 and April 2007. The mean follow-up period was 17.3 months, and the average age at the time of surgery was 61.7-year-old. Five cases underwent arthroscopic tuberoplasty and 6 cases had arthroscopic subacromial decompression and tuberoplasty, simultaneously. Results: The average Constant score improved from 61.8 to 86.9 and the average UCLA score changed from 14.8 to 31.8 with 6 excellent, 3 good and 2 poor results (p=0.003). The active forward flexion improved from $111.8^{\circ}$ to $154.1^{\circ}$(p=0.011). The acromiohumeral interval increased from 3.94 mm preoperatively to 4.22 mm postoperatively (p=0.12). In the poor UCLA score group, the acromiohumeral interval changed from 1.67 mm preoperatively to 0.94 mm postoperatively. Conclusion: Arthroscopic tuberoplasty may be a second option to relieve the pain of irreparable massive rotator cuff tears and improve the range of motion. However, good results could not be expected if the acromiohumeral interval is < 2 mm preoperatively and decreased postoperatively.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adamson GJ, Tibone JE: Ten-year assessment of primary rotator cuff repairs. J Shoulder and Elbow Surg, 2: 57-63, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/1058-2746(93)90001-W
  2. Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL: Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 15: 290-299, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2005.09.017
  3. Blevins FT, Warren RF, Cavo C, et al.: Arthroscopic assisted rotator cuff repair: results using a mini-open deltoid splitting approach. Arthroscopy, 12: 50-59, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(96)90219-4
  4. Burkhart SS: Arthroscopic debridement and decompression for selected rotator cuff tears. Orthop Clin North Am, 24: 111-123, 1993.
  5. Burkhart SS: Arthroscopic treatment of massive rotator cuff tears. Clinical results and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 45-56, 1991.
  6. Cofield RH: Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 154: 667-672, 1982.
  7. Constant CR, Murley AH: A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 160-164, 1987.
  8. Debeyre J, Patie D, Elmelik E: Repair of Ruptures of the Rotator Cuff of the Shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 47: 36-42, 1965.
  9. Duralde XA, Bair B: Massive rotator cuff tears: the result of partial rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 14: 121-127, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.06.015
  10. Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M: Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 68: 1136-1144, 1986.
  11. Fenlin JM, Jr., Chase JM, Rushton SA, Frieman BG: Tuberoplasty: creation of an acromiohumeral articulation-a treatment option for massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 11: 136-142, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1067/mse.2002.121764
  12. Gartsman GM: Massive, irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. Results of operative debridement and subacromial decompression. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 79: 715-721, 1997.
  13. Gerber C: Latissimus dorsi transfer for the treatment of irreparable tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 275: 152-160, 1992.
  14. Grammont PM, Baulot E: Delta shoulder prosthesis for rotator cuff rupture. Orthopedics, 16: 65-68, 1993.
  15. Hawkins RJ, Misamore GW, Hobeika PE: Surgery for full-thickness rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 67: 1349-1355, 1985.
  16. Kempf JF, Gleyze P, Bonnomet F, et al.: A multicenter study of 210 rotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic acromioplasty. Arthroscopy, 15: 56-66, 1999.
  17. McLaughlin HL: Lesions of the musculotendinous cuff of the shoulder. I. The exposure and treatment of tears with retraction. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 26: 31-51, 1944.
  18. Melillo AS, Savoie FH, 3rd, Field LD: Massive rotator cuff tears: debridement versus repair. Orthop Clin North Am, 28: 117-124, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-5898(05)70269-8
  19. Neviaser JS: Ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder. New concepts in the diagnosis and operative treatment of chronic ruptures. Arch Surg, 102: 483-485, 1971. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1971.01350050049015
  20. Neviaser JS, Neviaser RJ, Neviaser TJ: The repair of chronic massive ruptures of the rotator cuff of the shoulder by use of a freeze-dried rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 60: 681-684, 1978.
  21. Nobuhara K, Hata Y, Komai M: Surgical procedure and results of repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 54-59, 1994.
  22. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Demaziere A: Arthroscopic debridement versus open repair for rotator cuff tears. A prospective cohort study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 75:416-420, 1993.
  23. Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Masuhara K, Tamai S, Yoshimoto S: Reconstruction of chronic massive rotator cuff tears with synthetic materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 202: 173-183, 1986.
  24. Rhee YG, Vishvanathan T, Thailoo BBBR: The "3 Sister Portals" for arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg, 8: 53-57, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1097/bte.0b013e3180335cc9
  25. Rockwood CA, Jr., Williams GR, Jr., Burkhead WZ, Jr.: Debridement of degenerative, irreparable lesions of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 77:857-866, 1995.
  26. Scheibel M, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P: Reversed arthroscopic subacromial decompression for massive rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 13: 272-278, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2004.01.007
  27. Tauro JC: Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of technique and results at 2- and 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy, 14: 45-51, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(98)70119-7
  28. Worland RL, Arredondo J, Angles F, Lopez-Jimenez F: Repair of massive rotator cuff tears in patients older than 70 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 8: 26-30, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90050-2
  29. Zvijac JE, Levy HJ, Lemak LJ: Arthroscopic subacromial decompression in the treatment of full thickness rotator cuff tears: a 3- to 6-year follow-up. Arthroscopy, 10: 518-523, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-8063(05)80006-4