DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Bioequivalence of Rofcin Tablet to Ciprobay Tablet (Ciprofloxacin 250 mg)

씨프로바이정 (시프로플록사신 250 mg)에 대한 로프신정의 생물학적 동등성평가

  • Published : 2009.12.20

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of two ciprofloxacin tablets, Ciprobay (Bayer Korea Ltd.) and Rofcin (Binex Co., Ltd.), according to the guidelines of Korea Food and Drug Administration (KFDA). The release of ciprofloxacin from the two ciprofloxacin tablets in vitro was tested using KP XIII Apparatus I method with dissolution media (0.01 M HCl). The dissolution profiles of two ciprofloxacin tablets were very similar at dissolution media. Twenty four healthy male volunteers were divided into two groups and a randomized 2$2{\times}2$2 cross-over study was employed. After one tablet (250 mg ciprofloxacin) was orally administrated, blood was taken and the concentrations of ciprofloxacin in serum were determined using HPLC with UV detector. The pharmacokinetic parameters such as $AUC_t,\;C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ were calculated. The results showed that the differences in $AUC_t,\;C_{max}\;and\;T_{max}$ between two ciprofloxacin tablets based on the Ciprobay were -0.63%, 3.98% and -9.23%, respectively. There were no sequence effects between two tablets in these parameter. The 90% confidence intervals using logarithmically transformed data were within the acceptance range of log(0.8) to log(1.25)(e.g., log(0.9520)~log(1.0523) and log(0.9689)~log(1.1663) for $AUC_1\;and\;C_{max}$, respectively). Thus, Rofcin tablet was bioequivalent to Ciprobay tablet.

Keywords

References

  1. M. LeBel, Ciprofloxacin: chemistry, mechanism of action, resistance, antimicrobial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical trials, and adverse reactions. Pharmacotheraphy, 8(1), 3-33 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1988.tb04058.x
  2. T.L. Ke, G. Cagle, B. Schlech, O.J. Lorenzetti and J. Mattern, Ocular bioavailability of ciprofloxacin in sustained release formulations, J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther., 17, 555-563 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1089/10807680152729248
  3. A. Lubasch, I. Kelle, K. Borner, P. Koeppe and H. Lode, Comparative pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin, gatifloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin, trovafloxacin, and moxifloxacin after single oral administration in healthy volunteers. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 44(10), 2600-2603 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1128/AAC.44.10.2600-2603.2000
  4. 염산시프로플록사신제제의 생물학적동등성시험지침, 식품의약품 안전청 독성연구원 의약품동등성평가과, pp. 147-151 (2002.1)
  5. 식품의약품안전청 고시 제 2005-31호(2005. 6. 7), 생물학적 동등성시험 기준.
  6. Y.H. Ha, S.H. Cho, S.K. Chun, S.H. Seo, J.H. Rew, Y.W. Choi and K.T. Lee, Validation of a simple HPLC method for determination of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride in human plasma. J. Kor. Pharm. Sci., 34(4), 327-331 (2004).
  7. M.T. Maya, N.J. Goncalves, N.B. Silva and J.A. Morais, Simple high-performance liquid chromatograic assay for the determination of ciprofloxacin in human plasma with ultraviolt detection. J. Chroma. B. Biomed. Sci., 755(1-2), 305-309 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4347(01)00126-8
  8. R. Bellmann, P. Egger, W. Gritsch, R. Bellmann-Weiler, M. Joannidis, S. Dunzendorfer and ChJ. Wiedermann, Pharmacokinetics of ciprofloxacin in patients with acute renal failure undergoing continuous venovenous haemofiltration:influence of concomitant liver cirrosis. Acta. Med. Austriaca., 29(3), 112-116 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1563-2571.2002.02017.x
  9. Y.J. Lee, Y.G. Kim, M.G. Lee, S.J. Chung, M.H. Lee and C.K. Shim, Analysis of bioequivalence study using logtransformed model, Yakhakhoeji, 44, 308-314 (2000).