DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Synthesis and SAR of N-Chlorophenyl Substituted Piperrazinylethyl-aminomethylpyrazoles as 5-HT3A Inhibitors

  • Lee, Byung-Hwan (Department of Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio/Molecular Informatics Center, Konkuk University) ;
  • Choi, In-Sung (Life-Sciences Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Rhim, Hye-Whon (Life-Sciences Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Choi, Kyung-Il (Life-Sciences Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)) ;
  • Nah, Seung-Yeol (Department of Physiology, College of Veterinary Medicine and Bio/Molecular Informatics Center, Konkuk University) ;
  • Nam, Ghil-Soo (Life-Sciences Research Division, Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST))
  • Published : 2009.11.20

Abstract

5-$HT_{3}$ receptor;5-$HT_{3A}$ receptor channel activity;Novel 5-$HT_{3}$ receptor channel current blockers;Chlorophenyl substituted piperazinylethylaminomethylpyrazoles; The 5-$HT_{3A}$ receptors are one of ligand-gated ion channels and are known to be involved in visceral pain, anxiety, or anticancer agent-induced nausea and vomiting. In present study, we designed novel skeletons based on the developed 5-$HT_{3}$ receptor antagonists and evaluated their effects on 5-$HT_{3A}$ receptor channel currents ($I_{5-HT}$) of a series of pyrazole derivatives having N-chlorophenylpiperazine functionality (6-9). We found that most of N-p-chlorophenyl substituted piperazinyl-pyrazole derivatives (7b, 7c, 7e and 7h) exhibited the high potency for the inhibition of $I_{5-HT}$, whereas the compound without chloride (6) or with m-chlorophenyl group (a serious of 8 and 9) showed the low potency. These result indicate that p-chlorophenyl group is might play an important role for increasing the inhibitory potency on $I_{5-HT}$.

Keywords

References

  1. Hoyer, D.; Clarke, D. E.; Fozard, J. R.; Hartig, P. R.; Martin, G. R.; Mylecharane, E. J.; Saxena, P. R.; Humphrey, P. P. Pharmacol. Rev. 1994, 46, 157-203
  2. Dekash, V.; Surprenant, A.; North, R. A. Nature 1989, 339, 706-709 https://doi.org/10.1038/339706a0
  3. Maricq, A.V.; Peterson, A. S.; Brake, A. J.; Myers, R. M.; Julius, D. Science 1991, 254, 432-437 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1718042
  4. Jackson, M. B.; Yakel, J. L. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 1995, 57, 447-468 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ph.57.030195.002311
  5. Lummis, S. C.; Martin, J. L. Mol. Pharmacol. 1992, 41, 18-23
  6. Kranzler, H. R.; Pierucci-Lagha, A.; Feinn, R.; Hernandez-Avila, C. Clin. Exp. Res. 2003, 27, 1150-1155 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ALC.0000075547.77464.76
  7. Gaster, L. M.; King, F. D. Med. Res. Rev. 1997, 17, 163-214 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-1128(199703)17:2<163::AID-MED2>3.0.CO;2-Y
  8. Silverstone, P. H.; Greenshaw, A. J. Exp. Opin. Ther. Patents 1996, 6, 471-481 https://doi.org/10.1517/13543776.6.5.471
  9. Lecrubier, Y.; Peuch, A. J.; Azcona, A.; Bailey, P. E.; Lataste, X. Psycopharmacology 1993, 112, 129-133 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02247373
  10. Ait-Daoud, N.; Jonson, B. A. Addict. Dissord. Treat. 2002, 1, 75-80 https://doi.org/10.1097/00132576-200209000-00001
  11. Hodge, C. W.; Kelley, S. P.; Bratt, A. M.; Iller, K.; Schroeder, J. P.; Besheer, J. Neuropsychopharmacology 2004, 29, 1807-1813 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300498
  12. Bell, R.; Gilmore, P. E. J. Psycopharmacol. (Oxford) 2003, 17(3), suppl. A30
  13. Preston, G. C. Int. Acad. Biomed. Drug. Res. 1994, 7, 89-93
  14. Fiebich, B. L.; Akundi, R. S.; Lieb, K.; Candelario-Jalil, E.; Gmeiner, D.; Haus, U.; Muller, W.; Stratz, T.; Munoz, E. J. Rheumatol. 2004, 33, 28-32
  15. Nam, G.; Choi, K.; Koh, H. Y.; Pae, A. N.; Rhim, H.; Choi, I. S. KP 10-0654328
  16. Lee, B. H.; Lee, J. H.; Lee, S. M.; Jeong, S. M.; Yoon, I. S.; Lee, J. H.; Choi, S. H.; Pyo, M. K.; Rhim, H.; Kim, H. C.; Jang, C. G.; Lee, B. C.; Park, C. S.; Nah, S. Y. Neuropharmacology 2007, 52, 1139-1150 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2006.12.001