Korean Journal of Breeding Science (한국육종학회지)

The Korean Society of Breeding Science (한국육종학회)
권호 표지

Growth Performance of Pinus strobus at Four Plantations in Korea

스트로브잣나무의 조림지역에 따른 산지별 생장반응

  • Choi, Hyung-Soon (Dept. Forest Genetics Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Ryu, Keun-Ok (Dept. Forest Genetics Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Kwon, Hae-Yun (Dept. Forest Genetics Resources, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Jeon, Du-Sik (Forest Research Institute Gangwon Province) ;
  • Kim, Kyong-Hwan (Gyeonggi Forest Environment Research Institute) ;
  • Ahn, Chan-Gi (Chungbuk Forest Environment Research Institute) ;
  • Ahn, Young-Hwan (Jeonbuk Forest Environment Research Institute)
  • 최형순 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 유근옥 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 권해연 (국립산림과학원 산림유전자원부) ;
  • 전두식 (강원도산림개발연구원) ;
  • 김경환 (경기도산림환경연구소) ;
  • 안찬기 (충북산림환경연구소) ;
  • 안영환 (전북산림환경연구소)
  • Received : 2008.10.01
  • Published : 20081200
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The growth performance of Eastern white pine (Pinus storbus L.) was studied with six provenances in four plantations. All growth performances were significantly different among provenances and plantations. The most outstanding source in volume growth at age 39 is North Carolina in all plantations and this trends had been started from four years old seedlings. In plantations, the growth is best in ChunCheon plantation while that is worst in GunPo plantation. The Effect of plantations was thought to be larger than that of provenances growth of P. strobus. A pattern of growth by ages was different by among plantations and even ate age about 40, the growth was still vigorous. Annual precipitation, foggy days, altitude and sand contents in soil are positively correlated with growth and the correlations between by ages were very high.

스트로브잣나무의 생장을 산지별, 조림지별로 조사 분석한 결과, 국내에서 가장 우수한 생장을 나타내는 산지는 North Carolina, 가장 우수한 조림지는 춘천이었는데, 측정형질 공히 산지보다는 조림지에 따른 생장의 차이가 큰 것으로 나타났다. 형상비 분석을 통한 수목 생장은 비교적 안정적이었으며, 조림지별로 수령에 따라 매우 다른 양상을 나타냈다. 스트로브잣나무의 생장 강수량, 안개일수, 고도, 토양의 모래함량과 정의 상관관계가 인정되었으며, 연령 간 높은 정의 상관관계를 나타냄으로서 유령기 생장순위가 중기까지 그대로 유지되어 우수 산지 조기 선발의 가능성이 높은 것으로 판명되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권용락,유근옥,최형순,권해연,안영환.2007.전북완주 지 역에서 테다소나무 12개 산지간 생장특성. 한국육종학회지. 39(4):412-418
  2. 유근옥, 김홍은. 2003. 스트로브잣나무 (Pinus strobus) 産地 別生長및針葉의特性調査를통한造林및造景用種子生 長究明. 한국임학회지. 92:287-296
  3. 윤국병. 1959. 외국 수종육성에 관한 시험. 해방 전에 수입된 임목종자의 목록. 임업시험연구자료, 제1호. 1019
  4. 전상근, 한영창. 1991. 19년생 스트로브잣나무의 5個地域에 서의 産地間生長. 경희대학교 부설 식량자원개발연구소 硏究論文集. 12:113-120
  5. 한영창, 이갑연. 1983. 스트로브잣나무 15年生의 5個地域에 서의 産地間生長比較. 林育硏鞴. 19:73-80
  6. 한영창, 유근옥, 이재천. 1990. 스트로브잣나무 6개 産地間 生長比較:京畿華城地域에서의9年生結果. 林育硏報. 26: 51-54
  7. 한영창,유근옥,이갑연,장석옥.1988.ha당 재적생장과 단 목당 재적 생장에 의한 19년생 스트로브잣나무 산지간 생장 비교. 임육연보. 24:87-93
  8. Beck DE. 1971. Height growth patterns and site index of white pine in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science 17:252-260
  9. Choi HS, Ryu KO, Kwon YR, Kwon HY. 2007. Growth performance of 27-year-old Norway spruce (Picea abies) at four plantations in Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society 96(2):145-150
  10. Genys JB. 1968. Geographic variation in eastern white pine. Two year results of testing range-wide collections in Maryland. Silv. Genet. 17:6-12
  11. Genys JB. 1987. Provenances variation among different populations of Pinus strobus from Canada and the United States. Can. J. For. Res. 17:228-235 https://doi.org/10.1139/x87-039
  12. Joyce DG, Lu P, Sinclair RW. 2002. Genetic variation in height growth among populations of eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) in Ontario. Silv. Genet. 51:136-142
  13. Kwon YR, Ryu KO, Kim IS, Lee KY. 2006. Growth performance of Pinus densiflora introduced from six provenances of Japan at Chungju, Korea. Journal of Korean Forest Society 95(3):250-255
  14. Lancaster KF. 1984. White pine management, a quick review. USDA Forest Service, NA-FR-27. Northeastern Area State and Private Forestry, Broomall, PA. 4p
  15. Li P, Beaulieu J, Daoust GD, Plourde A. 1997. Patterns of adaptive genetic variation in eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) from Quebec. Can. J. For. Res. 27:199-206 https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-27-2-199
  16. Lu P, Joyce DG, Sinclair RW. 2003. Geographic variation in cold hardiness among eastern white pine (Pinus strobus L.) provenances in Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management 178:329-340 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00481-4
  17. Lu P, Sinclair RW. 2006. Survival, growth and wood specific gravity of interspecific hybrids of Pinus strobus and P. wallichiana grown in Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management 234:97-106 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.06.027
  18. Mader DL. 1985. Soil-site relationships for white pine in the Northeast. In Symposium proceedings-Eastern white pine: Today and tomorrow. p. 28-31. Funk DT, comp. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report WO-51. Washington, DC
  19. Matheson AC. 1977. Field results from a provenance trial of Pinus strobus L. in Australia
  20. Ryu JB. 1982. Genetic structure of Pinus strobus L. based on foliar isozyme from 27 provenances. Ph. D. Thesis, New Hampshire State Univ. 133pp
  21. Santamour FS. 1960 Seasonal growth in white pine seedlings from different provenances. Northern For. Exp. Sta. Res. Notes. 105: 4p
  22. Stephan BR, Liesebach M. 1996. Results of the IUFRO 1982 Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) provenance experiment in Southwestern Germany 45(5-6):342-349
  23. Wendel GW, Smith HC. 1990. Pinus strobus L.: eastern white pine. In Silvics of North America. Volume 1. Conifers. USDA, Forest Service, Agiculture Handbook No. 654
  24. Wilson RW, McQuilkin WF. 1965. In Silvics of forest trees of the United States. p. 329-337. Fowells HA, comp. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook 271. Washington, DC
  25. Zobel BJ, Talbert J. 1984. Applied Forest Tree Improvement. North Carolina State Univ., John Wiley and Sons, New York. pp. 505