The Influence of Ar Gas in the Nitriding of Low Temperature Plasma Carburized AISI304L Stainless Steel.

AISI304L 스테인리스강의 저온 플라즈마 침탄처리 후 질화처리 시 Ar 가스가 표면 경화층에 미치는 영향

  • Jeong, Kwang-ho (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Dongeui University) ;
  • Lee, Insup (Department of Advanced Materials Engineering, Dongeui University)
  • Received : 2007.10.10
  • Published : 2008.03.22

Abstract

Conventional plasma carburizing or nitriding for austenitic stainless steels results in a degradation of corrosion resistance. However, a low temperature plasma surface treatment can improve surface hardness without deteriorating the corrosion resistance. The 2-step low temperature plasma processes (the combined carburizing and post nitriding) offers the increase of both surface hardness and thickness of hardened layer and corrosion resistance than the individually processed low temperature nitriding and low temperature carburizing techniques. In the present paper, attempts have been made to investigate the influence of the introduction of Ar gas (0~20%) in nitriding atmosphere during low temperature plasma nitriding at $370^{\circ}C$ after low temperature plasma carburizing at $470^{\circ}C$. All treated specimens exhibited the increase of the surface hardness with increasing Ar level in the atmosphere and the surface hardness value reached up to 1050 HV0.1, greater than 750 $HV_{0.1}$ in the carburized state. The expanded austenite phase (${\gamma}_N$) was observed on the most of the treated surfaces. The thickness of the ${\gamma}_N$ layer reached about $7{\mu}m$ for the specimen treated in the nitriding atmosphere containing 20% Ar. In case of 10% Ar containing atmosphere, the corrosion resistance was significantly enhanced than untreated austenitic stainless steels, whilst 20% Ar level in the atmosphere caused to form CrN in the N-enriched layer (${\gamma}_N$), which led to the degradation of corrosion resistance compared with untreated austenitic stainless steels.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhao Cheng, C.X. Li, H. Dong, and T. Bell, Surf. & coat. tech. 191, 195 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.03.004
  2. E. Menthe, A Bulak, J. Olfe, A. Zimmermann, and K.-T. Rie, Surf. & coat. tech. 133-1134, 259 (2000)
  3. H. Dong, P.-Y. Qi, X.Y. Li, and R.J. Liewellyn, Mater. Sci. Eng. 431, 137(2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.122
  4. Y. Sun, and T. Bell, Wear 253, 689 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1648(02)00170-9
  5. I.E. Saklakoglu, N. Saklakogu, K.T. Short, and G.A. Collins, Mater. & Desi. 28, 1657 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2006.02.008
  6. Chih-Neng Chang, and fan-Shiong Chen, Mater. Chemi. & Phys. 82, 281 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-0584(03)00234-7
  7. Fan-Shiong Chen, and Chih-Neng Chang, Surf. & coat. tech. 173, 9 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(02)00842-3
  8. Y. Sun, Mater. letter. 59, 3410 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2005.06.005
  9. The-ho Lee, Yun-Chul Jung, and Sung-joon Kim, J. Kor. Inst. Met. &Mater. 37, 400 (1999)
  10. Y.Sun, and E. Haruman, Vac. 81, 1 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2006.01.015
  11. Isup Lee, and Kwang ho Jeong, Private work, 2007
  12. B.Larisch, U.Brusky, and H.-J. Spies, Surf. & coat. tech. 116-119, 205 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(99)00084-5
  13. Y.Sun, Mater. proc. tech. 168, 189 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.10.005
  14. C.blawert, H. Kalvelage, B.L. Mordike, G.A. Collins, and K.T. Short, Surf. & coat. tech. 136, 181 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0257-8972(00)01050-1