DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Verification of the Compact Airborne Imaging Spectrometer System

  • Published : 2008.10.31

Abstract

A wide variety of applications of imaging spectrometer have been proved using data from airborne systems. The Compact Airborne Imaging Spectrometer System (CAISS) was jointly designed and developed as the airborne hyperspectral imaging system by Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI) and ELOP inc., Israel. The primary mission of the CAISS is to acquire and provide full contiguous spectral information with high spatial resolution for advanced applications in the field of remote sensing. The CAISS consists of six physical units; the camera system, the gyro-stabilized mount, the jig, the GPS/INS, the power inverter and distributor, and the operating system. These subsystems are to be tested and verified in the laboratory before the flight. Especially the camera system of the CAISS has to be calibrated and validated with the calibration equipments such as the integrating sphere and spectral lamps. To improve data quality and its availability, it is the most important to understand the mechanism of imaging spectrometer system and the radiometric and spectral characteristics. The several performance tests of the CAISS were conducted in the camera system level. This paper presents the major characteristics of the CAISS, and summarizes the results of performance tests in the camera system level.

Keywords

References

  1. Aber, J. D., and M. E. Martin, 1995. High spectral resolution remote sensing of canopy chemistry. In Summaries of the Fifth JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, JPL Publication 95-1, v.1, 1-4
  2. Ben-Dor, E., K. Patin, A. Banin, and A. Karnieli, 2002. Mapping of several soil properties using DAIS-7915 hyperspectral scanner dataa case study over clayey soils in Israel. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(6): 1043-1062 https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160010006962
  3. Clark, R. N., and G. A. Swayze, 1995. Mapping minerals, amorphous materials, environmental materials, vegetation, water, ice, and snow, and other materials: The USGS Tricorder Algorithm. In Summaries of the Fifth Annual JPL Airborne Earth Science Workshop, JPL Publication 95-1, v.1, 39-40
  4. Clark, R. N., G. A. Swayze, and A. Gallagher, 1992. Mapping the mineralogy and lithology of Canyon lands, Utah with imaging spectrometer data and the multiplespectral feature mapping algorithm. In Summaries of the Third Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, JPL Publication 92-14, v.1, 11-13
  5. DALSA, 2001. DALSTAR 1M30P user's manual and reference
  6. Drake, N. A., S. Mackin, and J. J. Settle, 1999. Mapping vegetation, soils, and geology in semiarid shrublands using spectral matching and mixture modeling of SWIR AVIRIS imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 68: 12-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00097-2
  7. Gong, P., R. Pu, G. S. Biging, and M. R. Larrieu, 2003. Estimation of forest leaf area index using vegetation indices derived from hyperion hyperspectral data. IEEE Transaction Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41(6): 1355-1362 https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2003.812910
  8. Labspere Inc., 2006. Uniform source systems manual
  9. Lee, K., S. Yong, and Y. Kim, 2007. Design and development of the compact airborne imaging spectrometer system. Proceedings of International Symposium on Remote Sensing 2007, 118-121
  10. Merton, R. N., 1999. Multi-temporal analysis of community scale vegetation stress with imaging spectroscopy. Ph.D. Thesis, Geography Department, University of Auckland, New Zealand, 492p
  11. Microbotics Inc., 2005. MIDG II specification manual
  12. Roberts, D. A. and P. E. Dennision, 2003. Hyperspectral technologies for wildfire fuel mapping. Proc. 4th International Workshop on RS and GIS Applications to Forest Fire Management, pp.66-75
  13. SOMAG AG, 2006. Gyro-stabilized mound GSM 3000 manual
  14. Spectral Imaging Ltd., 2007. ImSpector V10E data sheet
  15. Yoon, Y. and Y. Kim, 2007. Application of hyperion hyperspectral remote sensing data for wildfire fuel mapping, Korean Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(1): 21-32 https://doi.org/10.7780/kjrs.2007.23.1.21