DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sustainability Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay Based on the Systems Ecology 2. Environmental Accounting for the Improvement of the Natural Environment Based on the Emergy Evaluation

시스템 생태학적 접근법에 의한 가막만 패류생산의 지속성평가 2. 가막만 환경개선에 관한 환경회계

  • Oh, Hyun-Taik (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Lee, Suk-MO (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Chan (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Jung, Rae-Hong (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Hong, Suk-Jin (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Kook (Univ. Florida Dept. Ecology) ;
  • Tilburg, Charles (Univ. New England Dept. Chemistry & Physics)
  • Published : 2008.08.30

Abstract

The objective of this research is to apply more scientific, quantitative methods and procedures of environmental investigation to the development of the natural environment and the improvement of the human environment during the establishment of a sewage treatment plant and special facilities using environmental accounting. This research was performed to develop a method of strategic environmental assessment on the operation of sewage treatment plant and reuse of shellfish seeding areas through the use of environmental accounting based on EMERGY evaluation. The result was applied to marine environment policy in order to evaluate the real wealth of the regional environment and economy for both the present phase and the proposed developed phase. Using results from the comparison of EMERGY indices between the present situation and future scenarios, cost benefit analysis was performed for three different scenarios: (I) construction of a new sewage treatment plant, (2) relocation and recovery of the shellfish seeding area, and (3) relocation and re-seeding of shellfish area and construction of a new sewage treatment plant. Cost-benefit ratios of the three scenarios are 1.88, 0.94, and 1.38, respectively.

Keywords

References

  1. 해양수산부, 2000, 환경보전해역 고시, 25pp
  2. 해양수산부, 2001, 환경관리해역 시범해역관리 시행계획 수립연구, 275pp
  3. 김남국, 2006, 현장관측 및 수치실험에 의한 가막만의 해양환경에 관한 연구, 공학석사 학위논문, 여수대학교, 여수
  4. 강대석, 남정호, 2003, 에머지 개념을 이용한 해양 환경 자원의 가치평가와 정책활용 방안, 한국해양 수산개발원, 기본연구 2003-19, 65-87
  5. Odum H. T., 1988, Self organization, transformity, and information, Science, 242, 1132-1139 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.242.4882.1132
  6. Hongfang L., Campbell D., Chen J., Qin P., Ren H., 2007, Conservation and economic viability of nature reserves: An emergy evaluation of the Yancheng Biospere Reserve, Biological Conservation, 39, 415-438
  7. 여수시민협, 2007, 돌산읍 무술목 목장용지 현황과 과제, 시민토론회 자료집, 7-12
  8. 김진이, 2007, 낙동강 유역의 오염총량관리계획에 대한 환경회계, 박사 학위논문, 부경대학교, 부산
  9. 엄기혁, 손지호, 조은일, 이석모, 박청길, 1996, Emergy 분석법에 의한 득량만의 환경용량 산정, 한국환경과학회지, 29(5), 629-636
  10. 손지호, 신성교, 조은일, 이석모, 1996, 한국수산업의 EMERGY 분석, 한국수산학회지, 29(5), 689-700
  11. Odum H. T., 2001, Emergy evaluation of salmon pen culture, University of Florida Press, 110-125
  12. Brown M. T., Bardi E., 2001, Emergy of Ecosystems. Emergy. Folio 4. of Handbook of Emergy Evaluation The Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 93pp
  13. 신봉균, 2007, 하수슬러지의 처분에 대한 생태경제성 평가, 석사학위논문, 부경대학교, 부산
  14. 전남대학교, 2006, 여수 하수종말처리장 최종방류구 주변해역에 하수처리수 배출수 미치는 영향 파악 보고서 - 육상 오염부하량 및 해역의 물질확산 시뮬레이션, 43-44
  15. 여수시, 1995, 여수.여천시 통합하수종말처리장 설치와 관련처리수의 해역배출에 따른 시뮬레이션 연구 및 개선방안, 366pp
  16. 여수시, 2005, 연등천 하천정비 기본계획 사전환경성검토서, 206pp
  17. 여수시, 2005, 2004년 여수통계연보, 172-180
  18. Brown M. T., Ulgiati S., 1997, Emergy based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainabnility : monitoring economics and technology toward environmentally sound innovation, Ecological Engineering, 9, 51-69 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-8574(97)00033-5

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Estimation of Environmental Carrying Capacity and Sustainability in National Land using the Emergy Synthesis vol.25, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.2.141