Journal of Environmental Science International (한국환경과학회지)

The Korean Environmental Sciences Society (한국환경과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sustainability Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay Based on the Systems Ecology 1. EMERGY Evaluation for Shellfish Production in Gamak Bay

시스템 생태학적 접근법에 의한 가막만 패류생산의 지속성 평가 1. 가막만 패류양식의 에머지 평가

  • Oh, Hyun-Taik (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Lee, Suk-Mo (Department of Ecological Engineering, Pukyong National University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Chan (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Jung, Rae-Hong (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Hong, Suk-Jin (Marine Environment Research Team, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Kook (Univ. Florida Dept. Ecology) ;
  • Tilburg, Charles (Univ. New England Dept. Chemistry & Physics)
  • Published : 2008.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This research outlines a new method for evaluation of shellfish production in Gamak Bay based on the concept of EMERGY. Better understanding of those environmental factors influencing oyster production and the management of oyster stocks requires the ability to assess the real value of environmental sources such as solar energy, river, tide, wave, wind, and other physical mechanisms. In this research, EMERGY flows from environment sources were 76% for shellfish aquaculture in Gamak Bay. EMERGY yield ratio, Environmental Loading Ratio, and Sustainability Index were 4.26, 0.31 and 13.89, respectively. Using the Emergy evaluation data, the predicted maximum shellfish aquaculture production in Gamak Bay and the FDA (Food and Drug Administration, U.S.) designated area in Gamak Bay were 10,845 ton/y and 7,548 ton/yr, respectively. Since the predicted shellfish production was approximately 1.3 times more than produced shellfish production in 2005, the carrying capacity of Gamak Bay is estimated to be 1.3 times more than the present oyster production.

Keywords

References

  1. 백상호, 1998, 판별함수에 의한 진해만 적조발생의 예찰수법, 석사 학위논문, 여수대학교, 여수
  2. Odum H. T., 1996, Environmental Accounting, Emergy and Environmental Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 294-303
  3. Odum H. T., 1988, Self organization, transformity and information, Science, 242, 1132-1139 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.242.4882.1132
  4. Odum H. T., 1983, System Ecology: An Introduction, John Wiley & Sons International Rights, Inc., 10-25
  5. Odum H. T., 2001, Emergy evaluation of salmon pen culture, University of Florida Press, 110-125
  6. Brown M. T., Bardi E., 2001, Emergy of Ecosystems. Emergy. Folio 4. of Handbook of Emergy Evaluation The Center for Environmental Policy, University of Florida, Gainesville, 93pp
  7. 신봉균, 2007, 하수슬러지의 처분에 대한 생태경제성 평가, 석사학위논문, 부경대학교, 부산
  8. 엄기혁, 손지호, 조은일, 이석모, 박청길, 1996, Emergy 분석법에 의한 득량만의 환경용량 산정, 한국환경과학회지, 29(5), 629-636
  9. 김남국, 2001, 시스템 생태학적 접근법에 의한 넙치 생산의 지속성 평가, 석사학위 논문, 부경대학교, 부산
  10. Brown M. T., Ulgiati S., 2001, Emergy measures of carrying capacity to evaluate economic investments, Population & Environment, 22(5), 471-501 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010756704612
  11. 조은일, 박청길, 이석모, 1996, 가막만의 환경용량 산정 (I) - 생태계 모델을 이용한 기초생산력 산정, 한국수산학회지, 29(3), 369-385
  12. 박영철, 최광식, 2002, 가막만 양식 참굴의 성장과 환경용량 추정에 대한 연구, 한국 환경생물학회, 20(4), 378-385

Cited by

  1. Geochemical Characteristics of Intertidal Sediment in the Semi-enclosed Bays of the Southern Region of Jeollanam Province vol.46, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2013.0638
  2. Emergy Evaluation of the Korean Economy and Environment: Implications for the Valuation of Marine Ecosystem Services vol.18, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.7846/JKOSMEE.2015.18.2.102
  3. Emergy Valuation of Tidal Flat Ecosystems in Korea: I. Characteristics of Environmental Emergy Inputs vol.21, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7850/jkso.2016.21.4.134
  4. A Study on the Estimation of Environmental Carrying Capacity and Sustainability in National Land using the Emergy Synthesis vol.25, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14249/eia.2016.25.2.141