Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지

5 YEARS EVALUATION OF COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATION ON PERMANENT FIRST MOLAR IN CHILDREN

어린이 제 1 대구치 복합 레진 수복물의 5년 후 임상평가

  • Kim, In-Young (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Jae-Moon (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Tae-Sung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Shin (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 김인영 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김재문 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 정태성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실) ;
  • 김신 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 소아치과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Clinical performance of resin-based composite material depends on case selection and on the proficiency of the operator. Especially, composite resin restoration on permanent first molar in children have more limitations clinically than adult patients according to stage of tooth eruption and patient's compliance. This study was designed to evaluate the clinical performance of posterior composite resin restoration in children after 5 years. 35 teeth of 16 patients who were received composite resin restoration on permanent first molar in Department of Pediatric dentistry, Pusan National University Hospital between January 2001 and December 2001 were evaluated based on Modified USPHS criteria. From the finding in this study, following conclusions can be made. 1. 6 teeth(17%) of 35 teeth was replaced, so 5-years survival rate of posterior composite resin restoration is 82.9%. 2. As results of each evaluation criteria, on color match, anatomic form, surface roughness, sensitivity/ discomfort, ideal A grade score was 86.2%, 93.1%, 86.2%, 86.2%, clinically accepted B grade score was 13.8%, 0%, 13.8%, 10.3%. On marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration, A grade score was 13.8%, 44.8% and B grade score was 79.3%, 34.5% and secondary caries rate was 20.7%. 3. 69.1% of teeth (20 teeth) was clinically accepted on all evaluation criteria.

치과용 복합레진(Resin-based composite material)의 임상적 결과는 증례의 선택, 기술적인 완성도, 술자의 숙련도등에 따라 다양하게 나타날 수 있다. 특히, 어린이의 제 1 대구치 복합레진 수복은 치아의 맹출 정도와 환아의 협조도 등에 따라 성인의 경우에 비하여 임상적으로 많은 제약을 가지게 된다. 이에 본 연구는 어린이에 시행된 복합 레진 수복물에 대한 5년 후의 평가를 목적으로 시행되었다. 2001년 1월 1일부터 1년 간 부산대학교병원 소아치과에 내원하여 제 1 대구치 복합레진 수복을 받은 16명 환자의 35개 치아에 대하여 modified USPHS criteria에 근거하여 정밀 평가를 시행한 결과, 다음과 같은 결론을 얻었다. 1. 35개 치아 중 6개(17.1%)는 재수복되어 복합 레진 수복물의 5년 후 생존율은 82.9%로 나타났다. 2. 평가기준별 관찰 결과, 색조의 조화, 마모도, 표면 조도, 민감성 혹은 불편감의 측면에서 이상적인 상태인 A등급은 각각 86.2%, 93.1%, 86.2%, 86.2%로 나타났고, 임상적으로 수용가능한 수준인 B등급은 각각 13.8%, 0%, 13.8%, 10.3%를 보였다. 변연적합성과 변연부 변색의 측면에서 A등급은 각각 13.8%, 44.8%를 보였고 B등급은 79.3%, 34.5%로 나타났으며, 이차 우식의 발생율은 20.7%를 나타내었다. 3. 69.1%인 20개 치아는 7개 항목 모두에서 임상적으로 수용 가능한 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Mair LH : Ten-year clinical assessment of three posterior resin composites and two amalgams. Quintessence Int, 29:483-490, 1998.
  2. Statement on posterior resin-based composites. ADA council on scientific affairs; ADA council on dental benefit programs. J Am Dent Assoc, 129:1627-1628, 1998.
  3. Sakaguchi RL, Berge HX : Reduced light energy density decreases post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent, 26:695-700, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00048-1
  4. Busato AL, Loguercio AD, Reis A, et al. : Clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 6- year results. Am J Dent, 14:304-308, 2001.
  5. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Cheung SW, et al. : Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. J Dent, 29:317-324, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00022-7
  6. Ritter AV : Posterior resin-based composite restorations : Clinical recommendations for optimal success.J Esthet Restor Dent, 13:88-99, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2001.tb00431.x
  7. Dennison JB, Straffon LH, More FG : Evaluating tooth eruption on sealant efficacy. J Am Dent Assoc, 121:610-614, 1990.
  8. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, et al. : Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Review of the clinical survival of direct and indirect restorations in posterior teeth of the permanent dentition. Oper Dent, 29:481-508, 2004.
  9. Cvar JF, Ryge G : Criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. US Public Health Service Publ No. 790-244, USGPO, 1971.
  10. Mjor IA, Kenneth JA : Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Criteria for placement and replacement. Quintessence Publishing Co., Inc., Illinois, p.61-68, 1989.
  11. Opdam NJM, Roeters FJM, Feilzer AJ, et al. : Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class II resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent, 26:555-562, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
  12. T¨urkuun LS, Aktener BO : Twenty-four-month clinical evaluation of different posterior composite resin materials. J Am Dent Assoc, 132:196-203, 2001.
  13. Burgess JO, Walker R, Davidson JM : Posterior resin-based composite: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent, 24:465-479, 2002.
  14. 이상호, 손흥규 : 5급와동 복합레진 수복에서 충전방법이 변연누출에 미치는 영향에 관한 실험적 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 14:51-64, 1987.
  15. Wilson MA, Cowan AJ, Randall RC, et al. : A practice- based, randomized, controlled clinical trial of a new resin composite restorative: one-year results. Oper Dent, 27:423-429, 2002.
  16. 권오진, 김종수, 권순원 : 광조사 방법에 따른 복합레진의 중합수축에 관한 연구. 대한소아치과학회지, 30:102-109, 2003.
  17. Unterbrink GL, Muessner R. : Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. J Dent, 23:183-189, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)93577-O
  18. Mehl A, Hickel R, Kunzelmann KH : Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. J Dent,25:321-330, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00044-9
  19. Bamzahim M, Shi XQ, Angmar-Mansson B : Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand, 62:61-64, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1080/00016350310008526
  20. Bader JD, Shugars DA : A systematic review of the performance of a laser fluorescence device for detecting caries. J Am Dent Assoc, 135:1413-1426, 2004.
  21. Shi XQ, Welander U, Angmar-Mansson B : Occlusal caries detection with KaVo DIAGNOdent and radiography: an in vitro comparison. Caries Res, 34:151-158, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1159/000016583
  22. Costa AM, Yamaguti PM, De Paula LM, et al. : In vitro study of laser diode 655 nm diagnosis of occlusal caries. ASDC J Dent Child, 69:249-253, 233, 2002.
  23. Chong MJ, Seow WK, Purdie DM, et al. : Visualtactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars. Pediatr Dent, 25:341-349, 2003.
  24. Rocha RO, Ardenghi TM, Oliveira LB, et al. : In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res, 37:437-441, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073396
  25. Loguercio AD, Reis A, Hernandez PA, et al. : 3- Year clinical evaluation of posterior packable composite resin restorations. J Oral Rehabil, 33:144- 151, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01539.x
  26. 백병주, 이승영, 이두철 등 : 광중합형 복합레진과 법랑질간의 마모특성 평가. 대한소아치과학회지, 28:261-270, 2001.
  27. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA : 2-year clinical evaluation of Class I posterior composites. Am J Dent, 9:150-152, 1996.
  28. Donly KJ, Garcia-Godoy F : The use of resin-based composite in children. Pediatr Dent, 24:480-488, 2002.
  29. Leinfelder KF : Microfilled composite resins. Gen Dent, 30:473-476, 1982.