DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Output-Only System Identification and Model Updating for Performance Evaluation of Tall Buildings

초고층건물의 성능평가를 위한 응답의존 시스템판별 및 모델향상

  • Published : 2008.08.31

Abstract

Dynamic response measurements from natural excitation were carried out for 25- and 42-story buildings to evaluate their inherent properties, such as natural frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios. Both are reinforced concrete buildings adopting a core wall, or with shear walls as the major lateral force resisting system, but frames are added in the plan or elevation. In particular, shear walls in a 25-story building are converted to frames from the 4th floor level downwards while maintaining a core wall throughout, resulting in a fairly complex structure. Due to this, along with similar stiffness characteristics in the principal directions, significantly coupled and closely spaced modes of motion are expected in this building, making identification rather difficult. By using various state-of-the-art system identification methods, the modal parameters are extracted, and the results are then compared. Three frequency-domain and four time-domain based operational modal identification methods are considered. Overall, all natural frequencies and damping ratios estimated from the different identification methods showed a greater consistency for both buildings, while mode shapes exhibited some degree of discrepancy, varying from method to method. On the other hand, in comparison with analysis results obtained using the initial finite element(FE) models, test results exhibited a significant difference of about doubled frequencies, at least for the three lower modes in both buildings. To improve the correlation between test and analysis, a few manual schemes of FE model updating based on plausible reasons have been applied, and acceptable results are obtained. The advantages and disadvantages of each identification method used are addressed, and some difficulties that might arise from the updating of FE models, including automatic procedures, for such large structures are carefully discussed.

구조물에 고유한 진동수,모드형태 및 감쇠비 등과 같은 동적성능치를 추출하기 위하여 25층 및 42층 건물에 대하여 자연진동에 의한 동적계측실험을 수행하였다. 고려된 건물은 주요 횡하중 지지기구로서 코아벽체 혹은 전단벽체가 추가된 철근콘크리트건물이며, 입면 혹은 평면상으로 골조가 혼합된 구조형식을 나타낸다. 특히, 25층 건물은 측면에 위치한 코아벽체 이외에 상부로부터 내려오는 전단벽 구조가 4층 바닥이하에서 골조형식으로 전환되는 복잡한 구조이다. 이와 같은 이유 및 건물 주방향의 유사한 강성배치로 매우 근접하고 혼합된 모드형태가 예상되어 시스템판별 시 어려움이 예상된다. 현재까지 개발된 다양한 시스템판별법을 대상건물의 자연진동 실측기록에 적용하여 모달계수를 유도하였으며, 그 결과를 비교 분석하였다. 3개의 주파수영역 및 4개의 시간영역에 근거한 응답의존 시스템판별법이 고려되었다. 서로 다른 시스템판별법에 의하여 추출된 고유진동수 및 감쇠비는 대체로 상당한 일치를 보였으나, 모드형태는 사용된 방법에 따라 정도가 다르게 불일치를 나타냈다. 실험으로부터 추출한 성능치와 초기 유한요소해석 값을 비교해 본 결과 대상건물 모두 적어도 저차 3개의 고유진동수에서 2배 정도의 차이를 나타냈다. 실험과 해석결과의 일치를 위하여 몇몇 수동모델향상이 시도되었으며, 허용할 만한 결과를 획득하였다. 사용된 시스템판별법에 대하여 각자의 장, 단점에 대하여 기술하였으며, 본 연구와 같은 실제 대형구조물에 대하여 자동모델향상기법을 적용할 시 예상되는 문제점에 대하여 토의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Akaike, H., "Stochastic Theory of Minimal Realization," IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, Vol. 19, 1974, pp. 667-674 https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100707
  2. Brinker, R. and Anderson, P., "A Way of Getting Scaled Mode Shapes in Output Only Modal Testing," Proc., 21st Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Kissimmee, Florida, USA, 2003
  3. Brinker, R., Zhang, L., and Anderson, P., "Modal Identification from Ambient Responses Using Frequency Domain Decomposition," Proc.,18th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., San Antonio, Texas, USA, 2000
  4. Cauberghe, B., "Applied Frequency-domain System Identification in the Field of Experimental and Operational Modal Analysis," Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Mech. Engrg., Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium, 2004
  5. Charker, A. A., and Cherifati, A., "Influence of Masonry Infill Panels on the Vibration and Stiffness Characteristics of R/C Frame Buildings," Earthquake Engrg. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 28, 1999, pp. 1061-1065 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1061::AID-EQE856>3.0.CO;2-3
  6. Ewins, D. J., Modal testing: Theory, Practice and Application, Research Studies Press, Baldock, Hertfordshire, UK, 2000
  7. Felber, A. J., ''Development of a Hybrid Bridge Evaluation System,'' Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada, 1993
  8. Goethals, I. and De Moor, B., "Model Reduction and Energy Analysis as a Tool to Detect Spurious Modes," Proc., ISMA 2002 Int. Conf. on Noise & Vib. Engrg., Katholieke Univ. Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium, 2002
  9. Heylen, W., Lammens, S., and Sas, P., Modal Analysis Theory and Testing, Dept. of Mech. Engrg., Katholieke Univ. Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium, 1995
  10. Ho, B. L. and Kalman, R. E., ''Effective Construction of Linear State Variable Models from Input/Output Data,'' Regelungstechnik, Vol. 14, 1966, pp. 545-548
  11. Juang, J.-N., Applied System Identification, Prentice- Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1994
  12. Maia, N. and Silva, J., Theoretical and Experimental Modal Analysis, Research Studies Press, Taunton, 1997
  13. Midas IT, "Midas/Gen: General Structural Design System for Windows, Online Manual, V.7.1.1 (R2)," Korea, 2006
  14. Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G., "Stochastic System Identification for Operational Modal Analysis: a Review," J. Dyn. Syst., Meas., and Control, ASME, Vol. 123, No. 12, 2001, pp. 659-667 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1410370
  15. Peeters, B. and Ventura, C., "Comparative Study of Modal Analysis Techniques for Bridge Dynamic Characteristics," Mech. Syst. Signal Process., Vol. 17, No. 5, 2003, pp. 965-988 https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.2002.1568
  16. Peeters, B., "System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering," Ph.D. thesis, Dept. of Civil Engrg., Katholieke Univ. Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium, 2000
  17. Peeters, B. and De Roeck, G., "Reference-based Stochastic Subspace Identification for Output-only Modal Analysis," Mech. Syst. Signal Process., Vol. 13, No. 6, 1999, pp. 855-878 https://doi.org/10.1006/mssp.1999.1249
  18. Peeters, B., Van Der Auweraer, H., Guillaume, P., and Leuridan J., "The PolyMAX Frequency-domain Method: a New Standard for Modal Parameter Estimation," Shock and Vib., Special Issue dedicated to Prof. Bruno Piombo, Vol. 11, 2004, pp. 395-409
  19. Reynders, E. and De Roeck, G., "Reference-based Combined Deterministic-stochastic Subspace Identification for Experimental and Operational Modal Analysis," Mech. Syst. Signal Process., submitted for publication, 2007
  20. Reynders, E. and De Roeck, G., "What's New in System Identification for Experimental and Operational Modal Analysis," Proc., Thematic Conf. on Comput. Meth. in Struct. Dyn. and Earthq. Engrg., Rethymno, Crete, Greece, 2007
  21. Structural Vibration Solutions, "ARTeMIS Extractor: Ambient Response Testing and Modal Identification Software, User's Manual," Demark, 2001
  22. Turek, M., Ventura C. E., and Guerrero, S., "Ambient Vibration Testing and Model Updating of a 44-Storey Building in Vancouver, Canada," Proc., 25th Int. Modal Analysis Conf., Orlando, Florida, USA, 2007
  23. Van Overschee, P., and De Moor, B., Subspace Identification for Linear Systems: Theory-Implementation-Applications, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1996

Cited by

  1. FE Model Updating of Tall Buildings Using Output-only Modal Data vol.29, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5050/KSNVE.2019.29.1.131