Journal of The Korean Astronomical Society (천문학회지)

The Korean Astronomical Society (한국천문학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

PREDICTION OF THE DETECTION LIMIT IN A NEW COUNTING EXPERIMENT

  • Published : 2008.08.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

When a new counting experiment is proposed, it is crucial to predict whether the desired source signal will be detected, or how much observation time is required in order to detect the signal at a certain significance level. The concept of the a priori prediction of the detection limit in a newly proposed experiment should be distinguished from the a posteriori claim or decision whether a source signal was detected in an experiment already performed, and the calculation of statistical significance of a measured source signal. We formulate precise definitions of these concepts based on the statistical theory of hypothesis testing, and derive an approximate formula to estimate quickly the a priori detection limit of expected Poissonian source signals. A more accurate algorithm for calculating the detection limits in a counting experiment is also proposed. The formula and the proposed algorithm may be used for the estimation of required integration or observation time in proposals of new experiments. Applications include the calculation of integration time required for the detection of faint emission lines in a newly proposed spectroscopic observation, and the detection of faint sources in a new imaging observation. We apply the results to the calculation of observation time required to claim the detection of the surface thermal emission from neutron stars with two virtual instruments.

Keywords

References

  1. Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A., 1972, Handbook of Mathematical Functions (9th ed.; New York: Dover)
  2. Becker, W. & Tr¨umper, J., 1993, Detection of Pulsed X-Rays from the Binary Millisecond Pulsar J:0437-4715, Nature, 365, 528 https://doi.org/10.1038/365528a0
  3. Bevington, P. & Robinson, D. K., 2002, Data Reduction and Error Analysis for the Physical Sciences (3rd ed.; New York: McGraw-Hill)
  4. Biretta, J. & Heyer, I., 2001, WFPC2 Instrument Handbook, Version 6.0 (Baltimore: STScI)
  5. Bityukov, S. I. & Krasnikov, N. V., 1998, New Physics Discovery Potential in Future Experiments, Mod. Phys. Lett., A13, 3235
  6. Bityukov, S. I. & Krasnikov, N. V., 2000, On the observability of a signal above background, Nucl. Instrum. Methods A, 452, 518 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(00)00454-X
  7. Bowyer, S., Lampton, M., Lewis, J., Wu, X., Jelinsky, P., & Malina, R. F., 1996, The Second Extreme- Ultraviolet Explorer Source Catalog, ApJS, 102, 129 https://doi.org/10.1086/192254
  8. Currie, L. A., 1968, Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination , Analyt. Chem., 40, 586 https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60259a007
  9. Currie, L. A., 1972, The Measurement of Environmental Levels of Rare Gas Nuclides and the Treatment of Very Low-Level Counting Data, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci., NS19 (1), 119
  10. Currie, L. A., 1995, Nomenclature in Evaluation of Analytical Methods including Detection and Quantification Capabilities, Pure & Appl. Chem., 67, 1699 https://doi.org/10.1351/pac199567101699
  11. Ebeling, H., 2003, Improved approximations of Poissonian errors for high confidence levels, MNRAS, 340, 1269 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06374.x
  12. Ebeling, H., 2004, Erratum: Improved approximations of Poissonian errors for high confidence levels, MNRAS, 349, 768 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07692.x
  13. EUVE Guest Observer Center 1997, EUVE Guest Observer Program Handbook, UVB/EUVE Call for Observing Proposals 97-EUVE-06, Appendix C (Berkeley: Center for EUV Astrophysics)
  14. Feldman, G. J. & Cousins, R. D., 1998, Unified approach to the classical statistical analysis of small signals, Phys. Rev. D, 57, 003873 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.57.3873
  15. Gehrels, N., 1986, Confidence limits for small numbers of events in astrophysical data, ApJ, 303, 336 https://doi.org/10.1086/164079
  16. Giunti, C., 1999, A new ordering principle for the classical statistical analysis of Poisson processes with background, Phys. Rev. D, 59, 053001 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.59.053001
  17. Hernandez, J. J., Navas, S., & Rebecchi, P., 1996, Estimating exclusion limits in prospective studies of searches, Nucl. Instr. Methods, A378, 301
  18. Huffman, R. E., 1992, Atmospheric Ultraviolet Remote Sensing (Boston: Academic Press, Inc.), 32
  19. Korpela, E. J. & Bowyer, S., 1998, Extreme Ultraviolet Explorer Observations of Neutron Stars, AJ, 115, 2551 https://doi.org/10.1086/300371
  20. Narsky, I., 2000, Estimation of upper limits using a Poisson statistic, Nucl. Instr. Methods, A450, 444
  21. Roe, B. P., 1999, Improved Probability Method for Estimating Signal in the Presence of Background , Phys. Rev. D, 60, 053009 https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.60.053009
  22. Seon, K.-I. & Edelstein, J., 1998, Extreme-Ultraviolet Observations of Nine Pulsars, AJ, 115, 2097 https://doi.org/10.1086/300345