Developing Method of Auxiliary Label by Korean Braillewritier Letter for Drug Consultation

한국인 시각 장애우 환자의 복약지도 증진을 위한 점자용 보조라벨 개발의 필요성과 개발방법 제시

  • Lim, Sung-Cil (College of Pharmacy, CBITRC, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Myung-Koo (College of Pharmacy, CBITRC, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Chong-Kil (College of Pharmacy, CBITRC, Chungbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Bo-Reum (College of Pharmacy, CBITRC, Chungbuk National University)
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

All pharmacists must provide the drug consultation whenever dispense drugs to patients by the Korean Pharmacy Law. Drug consultation is very important procedure for increasing pharmacotherapy. Because it maximizes the therapeutic effects or/and minimizes adverse drug reaction during the drug therapy. However, it is not easy to do because of the dynamic and hectic pharmacy environment. Especially, if someone has a disabling body function, they required more time and efforts to perform consultation by pharmacist. Currently several auxiliary labels for helping drug consultation are using in pharmacy practice but not for disabling patients. Therefore we developed the total 53 auxiliary labels with size of 0.7 cm (width) and 1 cm (length) by Braillewriter letters for blind patients. This research has been performed for total 12 months (Mar. 15ts, 2007$\sim$Feb. 25th, 2008) and the developing methods are consisted of 4 steps: 1) selection of essential informations, 2) simplification of information, 3) changing for Braillewriter letters, 4) application and revising by blindness patients. Also the labels are consisted of 12 for adverse reactions and precautions, 8 for directions, 2 for storages, 9 for duration, 9 for dosage forms, and 12 for common names. After developed those labels, we revised those labels by discussion with 2 blind people. In conclusion, the new auxiliary labels for blind patients can increase therapeutic effects and decrease risks from pharmacotherapy besides decreasing of pharmacist's work load in the future.

Keywords

References

  1. 복약지도용 보조레벨, 서울시 약사협회 (2008)
  2. 약사법규분과회, 약사법규(개정판), 학창사 (2006)
  3. 도움나라 http://www.itall.or.kr
  4. 장애이해사이트 국립특수교육원 http://edu.kise.go.kr
  5. 점자참고 http://myhome.naver.com/twingun
  6. 한국시각장애인연합회 http://www.kbuwel.or.kr
  7. 한국점자도서관 http://infor.kbll.or.kr
  8. 점자사랑 http://user.chollian.net/-torch3
  9. Dombroski, R. C., Schuna, A. A., Shaughnessy, A. F. and Nickel, R. : Auxiliary label use by pharmacists in South Carolina. J. Pharm. Techno. 7(2), 64 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1177/875512259100700211
  10. Stoneman, J. and Taloer, S. J. : Pharmacists' views on Indigenous health: is there more that can be done? Rural Remote Health 7(3), 743 (2007)
  11. Kowanko, I., de Crespigny, C., Murray, H., Greoenkjaer, M. and Emden, C. : Better medication management for Aboriginal people with mental health disorders: a survey of providers. Aust. J. Rural Health 12(6), 253 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1854.2004.00625.x
  12. Avorn, J. and Soumerai, S. B. : Improvement drug-therapy decisions through educational outreach: a randomized controlled trial of academically based 'detailing'. N. Eng. J. Med. 308, 1457 (1983) https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198306163082406
  13. Chassin, M. R. and McCue, S. M. : A randomized trial of medical quality assureance: improving physicians' use of pelvimetry. JAMA 256, 1012 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.256.8.1012
  14. Gehlbach, S. H., Wilkinson, W. E., Hammond, W. E., Clapp, N. E., Finn, A. L., Talyor, W. J. and Rodell, M. : Improving drug prescribing in a primary care practice. Med. Care 22, 193 (1984) https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198403000-00002
  15. Gullion, D. S., Tschann, J. M., Adamson, T. E. and Coates, T. J. : Management of hypertension in private practice: a randomized controlled trial in continuing medical education. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 8, 239 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.4750080402
  16. Heale, J., Davis, D., Norman, G., Woodward, C., Neufeld, V. and Dodd, P. : A randomized controlled trial assessing the impact of problem-based versus didactic teaching methods in CME. Proc. Annu. Conf. Res. Med. Educ. 27, 72 (1988)
  17. Jennett, P. A., Laxdal, O. E., Hayton, R. C., Klaasen, D. J., Seanson, R. W., Wilson, T. W., Spooner, H. J. and Mainprize, G. W. : The effects of continuing medical education on family doctor performance in office practice: a randomized control study. Med. Educ. 22, 139 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1988.tb00424.x
  18. Lomas, J., Enkin, M., Anderson, G. M., Hannah, W. J., Vayda E. and Singer, J. : Opinion leaders vs. audit and feedback to implement practice guidelines: delivery after previous cesarean section. JAMA 265, 2202 (1991) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.265.17.2202
  19. Putnam, R. W. and Curry, L. : Impact of patient care appraisal on physician behavior in the office setting. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 132, 1025 (1985)
  20. White, C. W., A;banese, M. A., Brown, D. D. and Caplan, R. M. : The effectiveness of continuing medical education in changing the behavior of physicians caring for patients with acute myocardial infarction: a controlled randomized trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 102, 686 (1985) https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-102-5-686
  21. Lee, K. P., Schotland, M., Bacehetti, P. and Bero, L. A. : Association of journal quality indictors with methodological quality of clinical research articles. JAMA 287, 2805 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2805
  22. Sigouin, C. and Jadad, A. R. : Awareness of sources of peerreviewed research evidence on the Internet. JAMA 287, 2867 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.21.2867
  23. Guyatt, G. H., Sackett, D. L. and Cook, D. J. : Users's guides to the medical literature. How to use an article about therapy or prevention. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA 270, 2598 (2002)