A Study on MR Cholangiography using Breathing Hold Target Techniqu by Prospective Acquisition Correction and Respiration Trigger Gating

Non Breathe Hold Technique를 이용한 MR 담도계조영술에 대한 고찰 : Prospective Acquisition Correction(PACE)기법과 Respiration Trigger Gating(RTG) 기법의 비교

  • Goo, Eun-Hee (Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Jeong, Hong-Ryang (Department of Radiologic Science, Hanseo University) ;
  • Im, Cheong-Hwan (Department of Radiologic Science, Hanseo University) ;
  • Kweon, Dae-Cheol (Department of Radiologic Science, Shin Heung College University) ;
  • Jo, Jeong-Keun (Department of Rdiologic Science Jeonju University) ;
  • Lee, Man-Koo (Department of Radiologic Science, Wonkwang Health Science Collge University)
  • 구은희 (서울대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 정홍량 (한서대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 임청환 (한서대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 권대철 (신흥대학 방사선과) ;
  • 조정근 (전주대학교 방사선학과) ;
  • 이만구 (원광보건대학 방사선과)
  • Published : 2008.05.30

Abstract

Recently, MR Cholangiography used mainly bu controlling of patient's breathing. There is breathing hold techniques to get images within shopt time and gating technique adjusted to respiration cycle for high resolution image. In this study, the aim of this experiment is to know on clinical usefulness compared with PACE and RTG thchniques. This study's period is from 2006 in November to 2007 in January. A total of 21 patients investigated at MAGNETOM Sonata 1.5T (SIEMENS Erlangen) with use of 12ch body coil. MR acquisition protocol used 3D turbo spin echo coronal sequence. Scan parameters applied to potimal setting in use as gating techniques, respectively. Analysis of consuming timing evaluated with rapidness. As analysis of quantity, the common bile duct, gall bladder measured in signal intensities, then these data were calculated by signal to noise ratio and contrast to noise ratio. Qualitative analysis, experienced 2radiologists and 3 RTs were evaluated into 3groups about artifact, accuracy of lesions, sharpness of the common bile duct or gall bladder. As a result of analysis, when compared to PACE, consuming time of the RTG took less than PACE, On both CNRs and SNRs, PACE technique was slightly high values than RTG(p<0.05). Qualitative analysis' results, discrimination of lesions in the common bile duct, gall bladder get a significance level in both RTG and PACE techniques but presence's artifact of breathing and pulsation highly demonstrate in PACE techniques. In conclusion, both PACE and RTG methods at MRCP provided prominently clinical information for the common bile duct, gall bladder. If machines have not limitation with performance, induction of breathing holding also will help getting diagnistic quality.

Keywords