Korean Journal of Medicinal Crop Science (한국약용작물학회지)

The Korean Society of Medicinal Crop Science (한국약용작물학회)
권호 표지

Phylogenetic Analysis of Artemisia spp. by Morphological Characteristics of Reproductive Organs in Korea

화기형태에 의한 국내 자생쑥의 유연관계 분석

  • Published : 2008.08.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to obtain the basic data for using the Artemisia genetic resources as a medicinal crop. 24 taxa including Artemisia capillaris Thunb. were analyzed by principal component analysis of 25 characters and cluster analysis for classification. In Principal components analysis of individuals of taxa using 25 morphological characters of reproductive organ, the first, the second, the third and the fourth components contributed 44.73%, 16.86%, 8.88%, and 7.07% of the variations, respectively. The cumulative contribution from the first to the fourth principal components was 77.56%. In cluster analysis, taxa of Artemisia L. was seperated 3 group by 25 morphological characters of reproductive organ, but it didn't completely coincident with Kitamura classification.

국내자생 쑥속의 식물을 약용작물 및 산업화에 활용하기 위한 기초자료를 얻고자 본 연구를 수행하였다. 그 결과, 수집된 쑥속 식물들은 사철쑥 (A. capillaris)을 포함한 20종 1아종 2변종 24분류군으로 분류 되었으며, 이를 바탕으로 25개의 화기형질을 이용하여 주성분 분석과 군집분석을 수행하였다. 주성분 분석결과 제1주성분은 전체 분산의 44.73%, 제2주성분은 16.86%, 제 3주성분은 8.88%, 제4주성분은 7.07%의 기여율을 보였으며, 상위 제4주성분까지의 누적 기여율이 77.56%였다. 군집분석 결과, 자방의 퇴화, 아관목, 두화의 크기 등의 주요형질에 의해 크게 3개의 군으로 구분되어졌으며, 화기구조의 식별형질로는 기발표된 Dracunculus, Abrotanum, Absinthium 3절과 완전히 일치하지는 않았으나 국내 자생쑥의 분류형질로 활용이 가능하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi SR, You DH, Ju IO, Jang I, Kim JY, Park CB, Ryu J (2008) Changes of pharmacological components and growth characteristics according to cultivation years of Artemisia capillaris Thunb.. Korean J. Medicinal Crop Sci. 16(1):57-61
  2. Cronquist A (1981) An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press., p. 1262
  3. Dhingra V, Rao V, Narasu L (2000) Current state of artemisin and its derivatives as antimalarial drugs. Life Science 66:279-300 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(99)00356-2
  4. Fu LK, Hong T (1998) Higher Plants Of China (Vol. 11). Qingdao Publishing House. China. p. 826
  5. Hind DJ, Jeffrey C, Pope GV (1995) Advances in compositae systematics. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK., p. 469
  6. Im RJ (1999) Flora Coreana (Vol. 7). The Science and Technology Publishing House. Pyongyang, Korea., p. 403
  7. Kadereit J (2003) Families and Genera of Vascular Plants. Berlin, Springer-Verlag., p. 635
  8. Kim KN, Lee JA, Yoon WJ, Kim JY, Song GP, Park SY (2007) The cytotoxicity of Artemisia fukudo extracts against HL-60 Cells. Korean Soc. Food Sci. Nutr. 36(7):819-824 https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2007.36.7.819
  9. Kitamura S (1940) Compositae japonucae, Pars Secunda. Mem. Coll. Sci. Kyoto Imp. Univ. Ser. B. 15:376-436
  10. Kitamura S (1957) New names and new conceptions adopted in our coloured illustrations of herbaceous plants of Japan (Sympetalae). Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 17(1):5-13
  11. Kitamura S (1991) Compositae asiaticae 6. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 42:141-157
  12. Kwon MC, Kim CH, Kim HS, Lee SH, Chio GP, Park UY, You SG, Lee HY (2007) Optimal extract condition for the enhancement of anticancer activities of Artemisia princeps Pampanini. Korean J. Medicinal Crop Sci. 15(4):233-240
  13. Lee H, Lin JY (1988) Antimutagenic activity of extracts from anticancer drugs in Chinese medicine. Mutat. Res. 204:229-234 https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(88)90093-6
  14. Ling YR (1991a) A review of the classification, distribution and application of Artemisia L. and Seriphidium (Bess.) Poljak. (Compositae) in China. Guihaia 11(1):19-35
  15. Ling YR (1991b) The old world Artemisia (Compositae). Bull. Bot. Res. Harbin, 12(1):1-108
  16. Mabberley DJ (1990) The plant-book. Cambridge. University Press., p. 920
  17. Park CW (2007) The genera of vascular plants of korea, Academy Publishing Co., p. 1481
  18. Singh N, Lai H (2001) Selective toxicity of dihydroartemisinin and holotransferin toward human breast cancer cells. Life Science, 70:49-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3205(01)01372-8
  19. Watson LE, Bates PL, Evans TM, Unwin MM, Estes JR (2002) Molecular phylogeny of Subtribe Artemisiinae (Asteraceae), including Artemisia and its allied and segregate genera. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2(17):1-12 https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-2-1
  20. Xu Q, Mori H, Sakamoto O, Usegi Y, Koda A (1989) Immunological mechanisms of antitumor activity of some kinds of crude drugs on tumor necrosis factor production. Inter. J. Immunopharmacol. 11(6):607-614 https://doi.org/10.1016/0192-0561(89)90145-8
  21. 김진수 (1996) 한국산 Artemisia속 식물의 정유성분과 생물활성 물질에 관한연구. 고려대학교 박사학위논문., p. 131
  22. 문관심 (1984) 약초의 성분과 이용. 일월서각. 서울., p. 755
  23. 신국현 (1995) 전통 천연향료 개발에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 천연물 과학연구소. 과학기술처., p. 135
  24. 오보 (2003) 신농본초경. 의성당. 서울., p. 340
  25. 육창수 (1981) 한국약품식물자원도감. 진명출판사. 서울., p. 436
  26. 인천시 강화군 (2007) 강화약쑥. 아카데미서적. 서울., p. 237
  27. 정보섭, 신민교 (1990) 향약(생약)대사전. 영림사. 서울., p. 1160
  28. 조연희 (2001) 국내 자생 쑥속 식물의 정유성분에 관한 연구. 서울여자대학교 석사학위논문., p. 67
  29. 허준 (1980) (한방)동의보감. 동아도서. 서울., p. 360
  30. 南 基泰, 近藤 誠三, 柴田 敏郞 (2003) 琉球列島のArtemisia 屬植物の藥品材料としての評價と種生物學的關係解明. 生物機能開 發硏究所紀要. 3:9-17