Disaster prevention as community education: From the viewpoint of activity theory

  • Koichi Suwa (Center for Human Activity Theory Kansai University ) ;
  • Fuyuhiko Yamamoto (Center for Human Activity Theory Kansai University ) ;
  • Tomohide Atsumi (Center for the Study of Communication-Design Osaka University)
  • Received : 2008.01.16
  • Published : 2008.02.28

Abstract

There are many social issues that should be solved through activity in the local community, such as community development, social service, environmental protection and disaster prevention. Despite a large number of activities, they are not always effective. In this investigation, we examine some alternative approaches to disaster prevention in local communities based on Japanese research and practices. Activity theory (Engestr öm, 1987) was adopted as a theoretical viewpoint. Implications for community education, which is another important issue in the community, are also discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.
  2. Holzman, L. (2006). What kind of theory is activity theory?: Introduction. Theory & Psychology, 16(1), 5-11.
  3. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Shaw, R., & Goda K. (2004). From disaster to sustainable community planning and development: The Kobe experiences. Disasters, 28(1), 16-40.
  5. Simpson, D. M. (2001). Community emergency response training (CERTs): A recent history and review. Natural Hazards Review, 2(2), 54-63.
  6. Simpson, D. M. (2002). Earthquake drills and simulations in community-based training and preparedness programs. Disasters, 26(1), 55-69.
  7. Suwa, K.,& Atsumi T. (2006). Daigaku-hatsu no saigai-borantia katsudo no kioroku: Niigataken-Chuetsu-Jishin ni okeru fromHUS no katsudo. [A record of university-launched volunteer activities in disaster: Activities of fromHUS in the Mid Niigata Prefecture Earthquake]. Bulletin of Graduate School of Human Sciences, Osaka University, 32, 231-251. (in Japanese with English abstract)
  8. Suwa, K., Atsumi T., & Seki, Y. (2006). Gakusei ni yoru saigaiji no borantia katsudo to jokyoteki-kanshin. Niigata-ken Chuetsu Jishin ni okeru fromHUS no katsudo kara. [Student volunteers active in disaster and circumstantial interest: Activities of fromHUS in the Mid Niigata Prefecture Earthquake]. Journal of Volunteer Studies, 6, 71-95. (in Japanese with English abstract)
  9. Suwa, S. (2006). Hanshin-Awaji Daishinsai no kyokun wo ikashita aratana bousai kyoiku. [A new disaster education based on the lessons of the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake]. Journal of Japan Society for Natural Disaster Science, 24(4), 356-363. (in Japanese)
  10. Suzuki, I, Suga, M, & Atsumi, T. (2003). Nihon ni okeru saigai borantia no doko] Hanshin Awaji Daishinsai wo keiki to shite. [Disaster volunteers in Japan: A historical review and the current movement since the 1995 Kobe Earthquake]. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 166-186 (in Japanese with English abstract).
  11. Watanabe, T. (2000). Chiiki-Shakai ni okeru go-nenme no kokoromi: "Chiiki-bosai towa iwanai chiiki-bosai" no jissen to sono shudan-rikigakuteki-kosatsu. [Trials in communities five years after the Great Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake: Group dynamics of "preventing disaster without saying disaster prevention"]. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(2), 188-196. (in Japanese with English abstract).
  12. Yamori, K., Kikkawa, T., & Ajiro, T. (2005). Bousai geimu de manabu risuku komyunikeishon: Kurosuroodo eno shotai. [Learning risk-communication through disaster prevention games: An invitation to Crossroad]. Kyoto: Nakanishiya-Shuppan. (in Japanese)
  13. Yamori, K. & Kao, Y. (2007). Geimu zukuri no purosesu wo katsuyo shita bousai-gakushu no jissen. [A gaming approach to disaster preparedness learning: An action research at a senior high school]. The Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 13-25. (in Japanese with English abstract)