내과 전공의가 시행한 초음파 이용 흉수천자를 포함한 흉수의 진단적 접근

Diagnostic Approach to a Patient with a Pleural Effusion Including Ultrasound-guided Paracentesis Performed by a Medical Resident

  • Lee, Yun Young (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Won Je (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Yu, Chang Min (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Suh, Seong O (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Eun Sil (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Ahn, Seok- in (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Chung, Jun-Oh (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Park, Sang Joon (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Yun Kwon (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Soyon (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Young Jung (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Lee, Se Han (Department of Internal Medicine, National Police Hospital) ;
  • Heo, Heon (Department of Radiology, National Police Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2008.02.23
  • 심사 : 2008.06.11
  • 발행 : 2008.06.30

초록

연구배경: 일반적으로 고식적 흉수천자가 어렵다고 판단되는 경우 초음파를 이용한 흉수천자를 영상의학과에 의뢰해 왔다. 영상의학과에 의뢰할 경우 검사를 위해 환자가 직접 이동해야 된다는 불편함과 영상의학과 스케줄에 따라 검사가 지연되거나 비용이 많이 드는 단점이 있다. 이에 저자들은 병실에서 내과 전공의들이 직접 초음파를 이용해서 흉수천자를 시행하는 단계를 포함해서 흉수가 있는 환자에게 접근해보았다. 방 법: 2003년 3월부터 2005년 6월까지 입원한 환자중 흉수가 확인된 환자들을 대상으로 하였고, 흉수의 양이 중등도 이상일 경우에는 고식적 천자를, 흉수의 양이 소량 이거나 소방이 형성된 경우 또는 고식적 천자를 실패 하였을 때에는 초음파를 이용한 천자를 시행하였다. 결 과: 총 89예의 연구대상 가운데 소방의 형성이 없으며 흉수의 양이 대량과 중등도의 양인 79예에서 고식적 흉수천자를 시행하여 74예에서 성공하였다. 고식적 흉수 천자가 실패한 5예와 흉수의 양이 소량인 7예 그리고 소방형성이 있는 3예를 합한 15예에서 초음파를 이용해서 흉수천자를 시행하였고 10예에서 성공하였다(66.7%). 소방이 형성된 3예는 모두 실패하였다. 이 3예를 제외하면 12예 중 10예에서 성공하여 83%의 성공률을 보였다. 2예(기흉 1예, 혈기흉 1예)에서 합병증이 발생하였다(13.3%). 결 론: 고식적 흉수천자가 실패하였거나 흉수의 양이 소량인 경우, 병실에서 내과 전공의가 초음파를 이용하여 흉수천자를 시행하는 것이 비교적 효과적이고 안전할 것으로 사료된다. 그러나 소방이 형성된 경우에는 영상의학과에 먼저 의뢰하는 것이 좋을 것으로 판단된다.

Background: A patient with a pleural effusion that is difficult to safely drain by a "blind" thoracentesis procedure is generally referred to a radiologist for ultrasound-guided thoracentesis. But such a referral increases the cost and the patient's inconvenience, and it causes delay in the diagnostic procedures. If ultrasound-guided thoracentesis is performed as a bedside procedure by a medical resident, then this will reduce the previously mentioned problems. So these patients with pleural effusions were treated by medical residents at our medical center, and the procedures included bedside ultrasound-guided thoracenteses. Methods: We studied 89 cases of pleural effusions from March 2003 to June 2005. A "blind" thoracentesis was performed if the amount of pleural effusion was moderate or large. Bedside ultrasound-guided thoracentesis was performed for small or loculated effusions or for the cases that failed with performing a "blind" thoracentesis. Results: "Blind" thoracenteses were performed in 79 cases that had a moderate or large amount of uncomplicated pleural effusions and the success rate was 93.7% (74/79 cases). Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis by the medical residents was performed in 15 cases and the success rate was 66.7% (10/15 cases). The 5 failedcases included all 3 cases with loculated effusions and 2 cases with a small amount of pleural effusion. All the failed cases were referred to one radiologist and they were then successfully treated. If we exclude the 3 cases with loculated pleural effusions, the success rate of ultrasound-guided thoracentesis by the medical residents increased up to 83% (10/12cases). Two cases of complications (1 pneumothorax, 1 hydrohemothorax) occurred during ultrasound-guided thoracentesis. Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis performed as a bedside procedure by a medical resident may be relatively effective and safe. If a patient has a loculated effusion, then it would be better to first refer the patient to a radiologist.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Light RW. Thoracocentesis and pleural biopsy. In: Light RW, editor. Pleural diseases. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001. p. 358-77
  2. Grogan DR, Irwin RS, Channick R, Raptopoulos V, Curley FJ, Bartter T, et al. Complications associated with thoracentesis. A prospective, randomized study comparing three different methods. Arch Intern Med 1990;150:873-7 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.150.4.873
  3. Seneff MG, Corwin RW, Gold LH, Irwin RS. Complications associated with thoracocentesis. Chest 1986;90: 97-100 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.90.1.97
  4. Aleman C, Alegre J, Armadans L, Andreu J, Falco V, Recio J, et al. The value of chest roentgenography in the diagnosis of pneumothorax after thoracentesis. Am J Med 1999;107:340-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(99)00238-7
  5. Collins TR, Sahn SA. Thoracocentesis. Clinical value, complications, technical problems, and patient experience. Chest 1987;91:817-22 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.91.6.817
  6. Raptopoulos V, Davis LM, Lee G, Umali C, Lew R, Irwin RS. Factors affecting the development of pneumothorax associated with thoracentesis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1991;156:917-20 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.156.5.2017951
  7. Lipscomb DJ, Flower CD, Hadfield JW. Ultrasound of the pleura: an assessment of its clinical value. Clin Radiol 1981;32:289-90 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(81)80042-6
  8. O'Moore PV, Mueller PR, Simeone JF, Saini S, Butch RJ, Hahn PF, et al. Sonographic guidance in diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the pleural space. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:1-5 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.149.1.1
  9. Roth BJ, Cragun WH, Grathwohl KW. Complications associated with thoracentesis. Arch Intern Med 1991; 151:2095-6 https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1991.00400100147026
  10. Hirsch JH, Rogers JV, Mack LA. Real-time sonography of pleural opacities. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1981;136: 297-301 https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.136.2.297
  11. Rozycki GS, Pennington SD, Feliciano DV. Surgeonperformed ultrasound in the critical care setting: its use as an extension of the physical examination to detect pleural effusion. J Trauma 2001;50:636-42 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-200104000-00007
  12. Weingardt JP, Guico RR, Nemcek AA Jr, Li YP, Chiu ST. Ultrasound findings following failed, clinically directed thoracenteses. J Clin Ultrasound 1994;22:419-26 https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.1870220702
  13. Kohan JM, Poe RH, Israel RH, Kennedy JD, Benazzi RB, Kallay MC, et al. Value of chest ultrasonography versus decubitus roentgenography for thoracentesis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1986;133:1124-6
  14. Diacon AH, Brutsche MH, Soler M. Accuracy of pleural puncture sites: a prospective comparison of clinical examination with ultrasound. Chest 2003;123:436-41 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.2.436
  15. Jones PW, Moyers JP, Rogers JT, Rodriguez RM, Lee YC, Light RW. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis: is it a safer method? Chest 2003;123:418-23 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.2.418
  16. Feller-Kopman D. Ultrasound-guided thoracentesis. Chest 2006;129:1709-14 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.129.6.1709
  17. Fishman AP, Elias JA, Fishman JA, Grippi MA, Kaiser LR, Senior RM. Fishman's pulmonary diseases and disorders. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1998
  18. Mason RJ, Broaddus VC, Murray JF, Nadel JA. Murray and Nadel's textbook of respiratory medicine. 4th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders; 2005
  19. Park SR, Kim JH, Ha NR, Lee JH, Kim SH, Sohn JW, et al. Etiology and characteristics of massive pleural effusions investigated at one university hospital in Korea. Tuberc Respir Dis 2006;61:456-62 https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.2006.61.5.456
  20. Shin IC, Na MJ, Lee SW, Kim YJ, Park IW, Choi BW, et al. A Study on the relationship between number of thoracentesis and complication after thoracentesis in tuberculous pleurisy. Korean J Med 1992;42:290-6
  21. Mayo PH, Doelken P. Pleural ultrasonography. Clin Chest Med 2006;27:215-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccm.2006.01.003
  22. Tu CY, Hsu WH, Hsia TC, Chen HJ, Tsai KD, Hung CW, et al. Pleural effusions in febrile medical ICU patients: chest ultrasound study. Chest 2004;126:1274-80 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.126.4.1274
  23. Bartlett JG, Finegold SM. Anaerobic infections of the lung and pleural space. Am Rev Respir Dis 1974;110: 56-77
  24. Bartter T, Mayo PD, Pratter MR, Santarelli RJ, Leeds WM, Akers SM. Lower risk and higher yield for thoracentesis when performed by experienced operators. Chest 1993;103:1873-6 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.103.6.1873
  25. Petersen WG, Zimmerman R. Limited utility of chest radiograph after thoracentesis. Chest 2000;117:1038-42 https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.117.4.1038
  26. Brandstetter RD, Karetzky M, Rastogi R, Lolis JD. Pneumothorax after thoracentesis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart Lung 1994;23:67-70