Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment

Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment (한국대기환경학회)
권호 표지

Current Management Status of Mercury Emissions from Coal Combustion Facilities: International Regulations, Sampling Methods, and Control Technologies

  • Lee, Sung-Jun (Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City) ;
  • Pudasainee, Deepak (Department of Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University) ;
  • Seo, Yong-Chil (Department of Environmental Engineering, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Mercury (Hg), which is mainly emitted from coal-fired power plants, remains one of the most toxic compounds to both humans and ecosystems. Hg pollution is not a local or regional issue, but a global issue. Hg compounds emitted from anthropogenic sources such as coal-fired power plants, incinerators, and boilers, can be transported over long distances. Since the last decade, many European countries, Canada, and especially the United States, have focused on technology to control Hg emissions. Korea has also recently showed an interest in managing Hg pollution from various combustion sources. Previous studies indicate that coal-fired power plants are one of the major sources of Hg in Korea. However, lack of Hg emission data and feasible emission controls have been major obstacles in Hg study. In order to achieve effective Hg control, understanding the characteristics of current Hg sampling methods and control technologies is essential. There is no one proven technology that fits all Hg emission sources, because Hg emission and control efficiency depend on fuel type, configuration of air pollution control devices, flue gas composition, among others. Therefore, a broad knowledge of Hg sampling and control technologies is necessary to select the most suitable method for each Hg-emitting source. In this paper, various Hg sampling methods, including wet chemistry, dry sorbents trap, field, and laboratory demonstrated control technologies, and international regulations, are introduced, with a focus on coal-fired power plants.

Keywords

References

  1. Brunette, B., E. Prestbo, and N. Bloom (2004) Mercury speciation in coal combustion flue gas: Flue gas Adsorbent Mercury Speciation (FAMS) method, DOE/NETL Hg Measurements Workshop, Pittsburgh, PA, July 13, 2004
  2. Chang, J.C.S. and S.B. Ghorishi (2003) Simulation and evaluation of elemental mercury concentration increase in flue gas across a wet scrubber, Environmental Science and Technology, 37, 5763-5766 https://doi.org/10.1021/es034352s
  3. DOE/EPRI (1996) A state-of-the art review of flue gas mercury speciation method, EPRI Report No. TR-107080
  4. DOE (2004) JV 36- Selective catalytic reduction mercury field sampling project? Final Report, 04-EERC- 09-01
  5. European Union (EU) (2001) Ambient air pollution by mercury (Hg), Position Paper. http://www. europa.eu.int/comm/environment/chemicals/mer cury/index.htm
  6. Gibb, W., W. Quick, and M. Salisbury (2003) Technology status review-monitoring and control of traceelements, Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), United Kingdom, http://www.dti.gov. uk/ energy/coal/cfft/cct/pub/pdfs/r249a.pdf
  7. Granite, E.J. and H.W. Pennline (2002) Photochemical removal of mercury from flue gas, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 41, 5470-5476 https://doi.org/10.1021/ie020251b
  8. Gutberlet, H. and J. Tembrink (2004) Dry sampling method used by E.ON for mercury speciation in flue gas, DOE/NETL & EPRI sponsored mercury measurements workshop, Pittsburgh, PA, Jul. 2004
  9. Laudal, D.L., J.S. Thompson, J.H. Pavlish, L.A. Brickett, and P. Chu (2004) Use of continuous mercury monitors at coal-fired utilities, Fuel Process. Technol., 85, 501-511 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2003.11.005
  10. Laudal, D.L., J.S. Thompson, and C.A. Wocken (2004) JV 36-selective catalytic reduction mercury field sampling project, final report, http://www.netl. doe.gov/coal/E&WR/mercury/pubs/FINALT36. PDF
  11. Lee, C.W., R.K. Srivastava, S.B. Ghorishi, J. Karwowski, T.W. Hastings, and J.C. Hirschi (2006) Pilot- Scale study of the effect of selective catalytic reduction catalyst on mercury speciation in Illinois and powder river basin coal combustion flue gases, J. of Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 56, 643-649 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464475
  12. Lee, S.J., J.O.L. Wendt, and J. Biermann (2007) High temperature Sequestration of Elemental Mercury by Non-Carbon Based Sorbents, 6th International Symposium on Coal Combustion (ISCC), Wuhan, China, Dec. 1-4
  13. Linak, W.P., J.V. Ryan, B.S. Ghorishi, and J.O.L. Wendt (2001) Issues related to solution chemistry in mercury sampling impingers, J. of Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 51, 688-698 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2001.10464301
  14. Meischen, S.J., V.J.V. Pelt, E.A. Zarate, and E.A. Stephens Jr. (2004) Gas-phase mercury reduction to measure total mercury in the flue gas of a coal-fire boiler, J. of Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 54, 60-67 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2004.10470886
  15. Niksa, S. and N. Fujiwara (2005) A predictive mechanism for mercury oxidation on selective catalytic reduction catalyst under coal-derived flue gas, J. of Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 55, 1866-1875 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2005.10464779
  16. Senior, C.L. (2006) Oxidation of Hg across selective catalytic reduction catalysts in coal-fired power plants, J. of Air & Waste Manage. Assoc., 56, 23-31 https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.2006.10464437
  17. Schmid, V. (2002) Continuous monitoring of mercury emission from stationary sources, Clean Air Engineering Inc. http://www.epamethod324. com/Reference/Library/publications/MercuryM onitoring.pdf
  18. UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2002) Chemicals, global mercury assessment, http:// www.chem.unep.ch/mercury/
  19. US EPA (2005a) News release-EPA announces first-ever rule to reduce mercury emissions from power plants, http://www.epa.gov/air/mercuryrule/ rule. htm
  20. US EPA (2005b) Control of mercury emission from coal fired electric utility boilers: an update, http:// www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/ord_whtpaper_hgc ontroltech_oar-2002-0056-6141.pdf
  21. US EPA (2004a) EPA-FDA Joint federal advisory for mercury in Fish: "What you need to know about mercury in fish and shellfish." http://www.epa. gov/mercury/advisories.htm
  22. US EPA, draft method 324 (2004b) Determination of vapor phase flue gas mercury emission from stationary sources using dry sorbent trap sampling, 40 CFR Part 75, Appendix K. http:// www.epa.gov/ttn/emc/proposed/m-324.pdf
  23. US EPA (2002) Control of mercury emissions from coalfired electric utility boilers, EPA-600/R-01-109, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/utility/ord_whtpaper _hgcontroltech_oar-2002-0056-6141.pdf
  24. US EPA (1998) Study of hazardous air pollutant emissions from electric utility steam generating units; final report to congress 453/R-98-004a & b, http:// www.epa.gov/ttncaaa1/t3/reports/ eurtc2.pdf
  25. US EPA (1997) Mercury study report to congress, an inventory of anthropogenic mercury emissions in the United States-volume II, EPA-452/R-97- 004
  26. Yang, H.-M. and W.-P. Pan (2007) Transformation of mercury speciation through the SCR system in power plants, J. Env. Sci., 19, 181-184 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(07)60029-1