한국임상수의학회지 (Journal of Veterinary Clinics)

  • 제25권3호
  • /
  • Pages.146-151
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1598-298X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2384-0749(eISSN)
한국임상수의학회 (The Korean Society of Veterinary Clinics)
권호 표지

Use of Likelihood Ratios in Evidence-based Clinical Decision Making

  • Kim, Eu-Tteum (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Pak, Son-Il (School of Veterinary Medicine and Institute of Veterinary Science, Kangwon National University)
  • 발행 : 2008.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

During the clinical decision making practitioners are often faced with performing diagnostic tests to solve the presenting problems seen in the patients. The diagnostic utility of a test has traditionally been described by technical terms such as sensitivity, specificity, and positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV). Although well known, clinicians are frequently unclear about the concept and application of these terms in everyday evidence-based clinical decision making. Sensitivity and specificity, which are intrinsic properties of diagnostic tests, summarizes the characteristics of the test over a population. The PPV and NPV are greatly dependent on the population prevalence of disease, and thus they do not transferable to different patients or clinical settings. Besides, considering the fact that clinicians more often interested in knowing the extent to which a test result could confirm or exclude of a condition under consideration (posttest probability), these measures do not provide answers on this question. The likelihood ratios (LR) using the information contained in sensitivity and specificity are becoming increasingly popular for reporting the usefulness of diagnostic tests because this term provide an indication of posttest probability as a function of the pretest probability. In this article, clinical applications of LR are illustrated with some practical examples. Discussion is also included of the inherent limitations regarding diagnostic test characteristics.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Atkins CE. Comparison of results of three commercial heartworm antigen test kits in dogs with low heartworm burdens. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2003; 222: 1221-1223 https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.2003.222.1221
  2. Bedenice D. Evidence-based medicine in equine critical care. Vet Clin North Am Equine Pract 2007; 23: 293-316 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cveq.2007.04.001
  3. Brunner CJ, Hendrix CM, Blagburn BL, Hanrahan LA. Comparison of serologic tests for detection of antigen in canine heartworm infections. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1988; 192: 1423-1427
  4. Byeon KH, Kim BJ, Kim SM, Yu HS, Jeong HJ, Ock MS. A serological survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection in pet dogs of Busan, Korea, and effects of chemoprophylaxis. Korean J Parasitol 2007; 45: 27-32 https://doi.org/10.3347/kjp.2007.45.1.27
  5. Christensen J, Gardner IA. Herd-level interpretation of test results for epidemiologic studies of animal diseases. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 83-106 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00118-5
  6. Chu K. An introduction to sensitivity, specificity, predictive values and likelihood ratios. Emerg Med 1999; 11: 175-181 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.1999.00041.x
  7. Chung D, Kim H, Lee T, Kim N, Lee J, Shin S. Prevalence of canine heartworm infection among dogs in Kwangju and Chonnam area. Korean J Vet Serv 1997; 20: 47-54. (in Korean with English abstract)
  8. Collins MT. Interpretation of a commercial bovine paratuberculosis enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using likelihood ratios. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2002; 9: 1367-1371
  9. Collins MT, Wells SJ, Petrini KR, Collins JE, Schuktz RD, Whitlock RH. Evaluation of five antibody detection tests for diagnosis of bovine paratuberculosis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2005; 12: 685-692
  10. Courtney CH, Zeng QY, Tonelli Q. Sensitivity and specificity of the CITE heartworm test and a comparison with the DiroCHEK heartworm antigen test. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1990; 26: 623-628
  11. Elstein AS, Schwarz A. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. BMJ 2002; 324: 729-732 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7339.729
  12. Fagan TJ. Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med 1975; 293: 257
  13. Fan CK, Su KE, Lin YH, Liao CW, Du WY, Chiou HY. Seroepidemiologic survey of Dirofilaria immitis infection among domestic dogs in Taipei City and mountain aboriginal districts in Taiwan (1998-1999). Vet Parasitol 2001; 102: 113-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4017(01)00511-8
  14. Fosgate GT, Adesiyun AA, Hird DW, Hietala SK. Likelihood ratio estimation without a gold standard: A case study evaluating a brucellosis c-ELISA in cattle and water buffalo of Trinidad. Prev Vet Med 2006; 75: 189-205 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.02.007
  15. Gardner IA, Greiner M. Receiver-operating characteristic curves and likelihood ratios: improvements over traditional methods for the evaluation and application of veterinary clinical pathology tests. Vet Clin Path 2006; 35: 8-17 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-165X.2006.tb00082.x
  16. Giard RWM, Hermans J. The diagnostic information of tests for the detection of cancer: the usefulness of the likelihood ratio concept. Eur J Cancer 1996; 32A, 2042-2048
  17. Greiner M, Gardner IA. Application of diagnostic tests in veterinary epidemiologic studies. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 43-59 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00116-1
  18. Guyatt G, Sackett D, Haynes R. Evaluating diagnostic tests. In: Haynes RB, Sackett DL, Guyatt GH, Tugwell P (eds). Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006; 273-322
  19. Hanson TE, Johnson WO, Gardner IA. Log-linear and logistic modeling of dependence among diagnostic tests. Prev Vet Med 2000; 45: 123-137 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00120-3
  20. Hesbach AL. Techniques for objective outcome assessment. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2007; 22: 146-154 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctsap.2007.09.002
  21. Jang SI, Song WJ, Ha SH, Lee SJ, Chung NK, Moon BC. Prevalence of heartworm disease in dogs of Daejeon area. Korean J Vet Serv 2004; 27: 133-137. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Koh BRD, Na HM, Jang MS, Kim JY, Park SD. Investigation of canine dirofilariasis and brucellosis in free roaming dogs from public animal shelters in Gwangju area. Korean J Vet Serv 2007; 30: 155-164. (in Korean with English abstract)
  23. Lee SM, Hwang HS, Kim JH. Studies on infection rate and histopathological findings of canine heartworms in Inchon city. Korean J Vet Serv 1999; 22: 25-35. (in Korean with English abstract)
  24. Lee JH, Sim SW, Kim H, Kim YJ, An SU, Han KS. Prevalence of canine heartworm infection among dogs on breeding farms in Chungnam province. Korean J Vet Serv 2003; 26: 19-26. (in Korean with English abstract)
  25. Lee JW, Eum SS, Park IG, Bea JJ, Joung DS. Prevalence of heartworms, scabies and demodicosis of pet dogs in Jeonju area. Korean J Vet Serv 2005; 28: 39-47. (in Korean with English abstract)
  26. Lim HS, Cho YJ, Suh DK, Song DJ, Lee CS, Bae YC. A survey on the infection rate of Dirofilaria immitis of dogs in Daegu area. Korean J Vet Serv 2003; 26: 129-134. (in Korean with English abstract)
  27. Peterson ME. Diagnosis of hyperadrenocorticism in dogs. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2007; 22: 2-11 https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ctsap.2007.02.007
  28. Sackett DL, Haynes RB. Evidence base of clinical diagnosis: the architecture of diagnostic research. BMJ 2002; 324: 539-541 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7336.539
  29. Schultz KS, Cook JL, Kapatkin AS, Brown DC. Evidence-based surgery: time for change. Vet Surg 2006; 35:697-699 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2006.00212.x
  30. Seo Y, Shin S, Kim J. Occurrence of canine heartworm disease on three breeding farms in the vicinity of Seoul, Korea. Korean J Vet Res 2001; 41: 79-83. (in Korean with English abstract)
  31. Seong JH, Yon HJ, Lee WC, Kim KH, Kang SW. Epidemiological survey on prevalence of canine heartworms in dogs of Seoul and districts of Pa-Ju, Seong-Nam and Po-Chon in Kyonggi province. Kor J Vet Publ Hlth 1996; 20: 155-162. (in Korean with English abstract)
  32. Steurer J, Fischer JF, Bachmann LM, Koller M, ter Riet G. Communicating accuracy of tests to general practitioners: a controlled study. BMJ 2002; 324: 824-826 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7341.824
  33. Wang LC. Canine filarial infections in north Taiwan. Acta Trop 1997; 68: 115-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-706X(97)00081-8
  34. Wee SH, Lee CG, Kim JT. Prevalence of Dirofilaria immitis infection in dogs of Chuncheon area. Kor J Vet Publ Hlth 2001; 25: 229-232. (in Korean with English abstract)