$BBPY^{(R)}$ graft for periodontal intrabony defects and molar furcation lesions: Case Report

다양한 치주 골내낭과 이개부 병변의 처치를 위한 $BBP^{(R)}$ 이식재의 임상적 효과

  • Kim, Myung-Jin (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Lee, Ju-Youn (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Sung-Jo (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Choi, Jeom-Il (Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 김명진 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 이주연 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 김성조 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실) ;
  • 최점일 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치주과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.03.31

Abstract

Purpose: Periodontal intrabony defects have great deal of importance since they contribute to the development of periodontal disease. Current treatment regimens for intrabony defects involve grafting of numerous bony materials, GTR using biocompatible barriers, and biomodification of root surface that will encourage the attachment of connective tissue. Xenograft using deproteinized bovine bone particles seems to be very convenient to adjust because it doesn't require any donor sites or imply the danger of cross infections. These particles are similar to human cancellous bone in structure and turned out to be effective in bone regeneration in vivo. We here represent the effectiveness of grafting deproteinized bovine bone particles in intrabony defect and furcation involvements that have various numbers of bony walls. Materials and methods: Open flap debridement was done to remove all root accretions and granulation tissue from the defects within persisting intrabony lesions demonstrating attachment loss of over 6mm even 3 months after nonsurgical periodontal therapy have been completed. Deproteinized bovine bone particles($BBP^{(R)}$, Oscotec, Seoul) was grafted in intrabony defects to encourage bone regeneration. Patients were instructed of mouthrinses with chlorohexidine-digluconate twice a day and to take antibiotics 2-3 times a day for 2 weeks. They were check-up regularly for oral hygiene performance and further development of disease. Probing depth, level of attachment and mobility were measured at baseline and 6 months after the surgery. The radiographic evidence of bone regenerations were also monitored at least for 6 months. Conclusion: In most cases, radio-opacities increased after 6 months. 2- and 3-wall defects showed greater improvements in pocket depth reduction when compared to 1-wall defects. Class I & II furcation involvements in mandibular molars demonstrated the similar results with acceptable pocket depth both horizontally and vertically comparable to other intrabony defects. Exact amount of bone gain could not be measured as the re-entry procedure has not been available. With in the limited data based on our clinical parameter to measure pocket depth reduction following $BBP^{(R)}$ grafts, it was comparable to the results observed following other regeneration techniques such as GTR.

Keywords

References

  1. Papapanou PN, Wennstrom JL. The angular bony defect as indicator of further alveolar bone loss. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:317-322 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1991.tb00435.x
  2. Papapanou PN, Tonetti MS. Diagnosis and epidemiology of periodontal osseous lesions Periodontol 2000 2000;22:8-21 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220102.x
  3. Carnevale G, Kandahl WB. Osseous resective surgery. Periodontol 2000 2000;22:59-87 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0757.2000.2220106.x
  4. Brunsvold MA, Mellonig JT. Bone grafts and periodontal regeneration. Periodontol 2000 1993;1:80-91 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0757.1993.tb00209.x
  5. Sculean A, Berakdar M, Chiantella GC, Donos N, Arweiler NB, Brecx M. Healing of intrabony defects following treatment with a bovine-derived xenograft and collagen membrane. A controlled clinical study. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:73-80.6 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.10192.x
  6. Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Healing around implants placed in bone defects treated with Bio-Oss. An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997; 8:117-124 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080206.x
  7. Mellonig J. Human histologic evaluation of a bovine-derived xenograft in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2000;20:1-29
  8. Goldman H, Cohen DW. The infrabony pocket: classification and treatment. J periodontol 1958;29:272-291 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1958.29.4.272
  9. Prichard J. A Technique for treating intrabony pockets based on alveolar process morphology. Dent Clin North Am. 1960:85:1
  10. Tonetti M, Pini-Prato G, Cortellini P. Periodontal regeneration of human intrabony defect. IV. Determinent of the healing response. J periodontol 1993;64:934-940 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1993.64.10.934
  11. Reynolds MA, Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Branch-Mays GL, Gunsolley JC. The effect of bone replacement grafts in the treatment of periodontal osseous defects. A systematic review. Ann Periodontol 2003;8:227-265 https://doi.org/10.1902/annals.2003.8.1.227
  12. American Academy of Periodontology. Posotion paper. Periodontal regeneration. J Periodontol 2005;76:1601-1622 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1601
  13. Kalpidis CD, Ruben MP. Treatment of intrabony periodontal defects with enamel matrix drivative: A literature review J Periodontol 2002;73:1360-1376 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2002.73.11.1360