Nutrition Research and Practice

The Korean Nutrition Society (한국영양학회)
권호 표지

Evaluation of fat sources (lecithin, mono-glyceride and mono-diglyceride) in weaned pigs: Apparent total tract and ileal nutrient digestibilities

  • Cho, Jin-Ho (Department of Animal Resource & Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Chen, Ying Jie (Department of Animal Resource & Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Yoo, Jong-Sang (Department of Animal Resource & Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Kim, Wan-Tae (Department of Animal Resource & Sciences, Dankook University) ;
  • Chung, Il-Byung (National Institute of Animal Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, In-Ho (Department of Animal Resource & Sciences, Dankook University)
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the effects of lecithin, mono-glyceride and mono-diglyceride on apparent total tract and ileal nutrient digestibilities in nursery pigs. Twenty [(Landrace$\times$Yorkshire)$\times$ Duroc] barrows were surgically fitted with simple T-cannulas. Dietary treatments included 1) CON (basal diet: soy oil), 2) LO (lecithin 0.5%), 3) MO (mono-glyceride 0.5%), 4) MG (mono-glyceride 1.0%) and 5) MDG (mono-diglyceride 1.0%). In apparent total tract nutrient digestibility, dry matter (DM) and gross energy (GE) digestibilities of MDG treatments were higher than LO and MG treatments (p<0.05). In nitrogen (N) digestibility, LO treatment showed the lowest compared to others (p<0.05). The digestibility of crude fat was higher in MDG treatment than CON and LO treatments (p<0.05). In apparent ileal nutrient digestibility, DM digestibility was higher in MDG treatment than LO and MG treatments (p<0.05). GE digestibility was higher in MDG treatment than LO, MO and MG treatments (p<0.05). N digestibility of MDG treatment was greater than LO treatment (p<0.05). Also, the digestibility of crude fat was higher in MDG treatment than CON and LO treatments (p<0.05). In conclusion, mono-diglyceride can increase apparent total tract nutrient and apparent ileal nutrient digestibilities of DM, GE, N and crude fat.

Keywords

References

  1. Aldersberg D & Sobotka H (1943). Influence of lecithin feeding on fat and vitamin A absorption in man. J Nutr 25:255-263 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/25.3.255
  2. AOAC (1995). Official method of analysis. 16th Edition. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC. USA
  3. Armstrong DG & Mitchell HH (1955). Protein nutrition and the utilization of dietary protein at different levels of intake by growing swine. J Anim Sci 14:49-68 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1955.14149x
  4. Bayley HS & Lewis D (1963). The effect of non-ionic surface agent on the digestibility of triglycerides and free fatty acid in the pig. Proc Nutr Soc 22:32-35
  5. Cera KR, Mahan DC & Reinhart GA (1988). Weekly digestibilities of diet supplemented with corn oil, lard or tallow by weanling swine. J Anim Sci 66:1430-1437 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.6661430x
  6. Cera KR, Mahan DC & Reinhart GA (1989). Apparent fat digestibilities and performance responses of postweaning swine fed diets supplemented with coconut oil, corn oil or tallow. J Anim Sci 67:2040-2047 https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1989.6782040x
  7. Cera KR, Mahan DC & Reinhart GA (1990). Evaluation of various extracted vegetable oils, roasted soybeans, medium-chain triglyceride and an animal-vegetable fat blend for postweaning swine. J Anim Sci 68:2756-2765 https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.6892756x
  8. Duncan DB (1955). Multiple range and multiple F test. Biometrics 11:1-42 https://doi.org/10.2307/3001478
  9. Freeman CP, Noakes DE, Annison EF & Hill KJ (1968). Quantitative aspects of intestinal fat absorption in young pigs. Br J Nutr 22:739-749 https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19680083
  10. Garrett RL & Young RJ (1975). Effect of micelle formation in the absorption of neutral fat and fatty acids by the chicken. J Nutr 105:827-838 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/105.7.827
  11. Hopkins DT, Wamer RG & Loosi JK (1959). Fat digestibility by dairy calves. J Dairy Sci 42:1815 https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(59)90813-6
  12. Jones DB, Hancocks JD, Harmon DL & Walker CE (1992). Effects of exogenous emulsifiers and fat sources nutrient digestibility, serum lipids, and growth performance in weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 70:3473-3482 https://doi.org/10.2527/1992.70113473x
  13. Li DF, Thaler RC, Nelssen JL, Harmon DL, Alee GL & Weeden TL (1990). Effect of fat sources and combinations on starter pignperformance, nutrient digestibility and intestinal morphorlogy. J Anim Sci 68:3694-3704 https://doi.org/10.2527/1990.68113694x
  14. Mattson FH & Beck LW (1956). The specificity of pancreatic lipase for the primary hydroxyl groups of glycerides. J Biol Chem 219:735-740
  15. Min BJ, Kwon OS, Lee WB, Hong JW & Kim IH (2006). The effect of soybean oil, dried palm oil powder and monoglyceride supplementation on growth performance and serum lipid changes in weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Technology 48:203-210 https://doi.org/10.5187/JAST.2006.48.2.203
  16. Overland M, Tokach MD, Comelius SG, Pettigrew JE & Rust JW (1993). Lecithin in swine diets: I. Weanling pigs. J Anim Sci 71:1187-1193
  17. NRC (1998). Nutrient requirement of pigs (10th Ed.) National Research Council, Academy Press. Washington, DC. USA
  18. SAS (1996). SAS user's guide. Release 6.12 edition, SAS Institute. Inc Cary, NC, USA
  19. Young RJ & Garrett RL (1963). Effect of oleic and linoleic acids on the absorption of saturated fatty acids in the chick. J Nutr 81:321-329 https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/81.4.321