A Process Model for Virtual Collaboration: Theoretical Synthesis and Empirical Exploration

가상협업을 위한 프로세스 모형

  • 서아영 (한국과학기술원 테크노경영대학원) ;
  • 신경식 (이화여자 대학교 경영대학)
  • Published : 2008.06.30

Abstract

When individuals collaborated in virtual settings, communication is medicated through a variety of communication technologies, and is associated not only with communication effectiveness but also with socio-emotional interactions among group members. In this regards, scholars have examined how technology-mediated communication systems can be designed and used to facilitated communication interaction. However, the empirical results of the previous studies have revealed inconsistencies in the effects of communication media on users' behavioral or attitudinal responses, and on their viable effectiveness in organizations. Some studies claim that computer-mediated communication(CMC) is task-oriented but not suitable for emotional expression since it hinders close interpersonal interaction. On the other hand, some studies argue that individuals are able to develop interpersonal relationships more effectively in a CMC environment than in an FtF-environment. Due to the different perspectives, a theoretical gap exists, and it leads to the inconsistent research findings. The purpose of this paper is to combine the two different perspectives into single unified model, thereby providing a more realistic and comprehensive understanding about virtual collaboration. The present study here sought to answers the following questions with organizational communication perspective: What are the major components of virtual collaboration? What factors affect the performance of virtual collaboration? And what kind of managerial efforts should organization make in order to facilitate CMC media effectiveness in virtual collaboration? Although there is a certain belief that new media, namely technology-mediated communication support would create new opportunities, the problem of "how" or "why" has been an important question that is still not fully addressed. In this regards, we collectively reexamined previous literatures with major issues which are still controversial and integrated various theoretical activity within computer-mediated communication domain: task-oriented approach, socio-emotional approach, and evolutionary psychological approach. Our first contribution is to develop a framework for virtual collaboration by combining two different perspectives into a single unified model, providing a more realistic and comprehensive understanding. The second main contribution is the joint modeling of both social presence and cognitive effort, and the effects on two distinct but important communication outcomes(i.e., take performance and relational development). We tested the research hypotheses which were developed based on the various CMC theories using data gathered through a self-administered mail survey of 127 individuals of 69 virtual workgroups. The proposed model was supported, providing preliminary evidence that the tension between two opposite view should be integrated. The results show that the individual's psychological processes(social presence and cognitive effort) in a virtual environment significantly mediated the effect of CMC inputs (media richness, user adaptation, and shared contest) on the CMC outputs (task performance and relational development). Furthermore, this study shows that the lack of perceived media richness of CMC media can be complemented by user adaptation and shared context. Based on the results, we discuss how communication system should be designed and implemented so as to promote virtual interaction as well as how a virtual workgroup should be composed to complement the lack of media richness. A virtual collaboration using CMC media may create new value by overcoming the logistical constraints. On the other hand, it may also generate various managerial risks such as communicational depersonalization, process dissatisfaction, and low cohesion. Therefore, this study suggests that organization managers should carefully choose the CMC mediums and monitor individual member's cognitive and affective psychological processes during virtual collaboration to reduce potential risks in virtual collaboration.

Keywords

References

  1. Burke, K., and Chidambaram, L., 'How Much Bandwidth Is Enough? A Longitudinal Examination of Media Characteristics and Group Outcomes,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23, No. 4, 1999, pp. 557-580 https://doi.org/10.2307/249489
  2. Carlson, J.R., and Zmud, R.W., 'Channel Expansion Theory and the Experimental Nature of Media Richness Perceptions,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42, No. 2, 1999, pp. 153-170 https://doi.org/10.2307/257090
  3. Chidambaram, L., 'Relational Development in Computer-Supported Groups,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 20, No. 2, 1996, pp. 143-165 https://doi.org/10.2307/249476
  4. Chin, W.W., 'Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No., 1, 1998, pp. 52-151
  5. Daft, R., and Lengel, R., 'Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design,' Management Science, Vol. 32, 1986, pp. 554-571 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  6. Daft, R., Lengel, R., and Trevino, L., 'Message Equivocality, Media Selection and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 17, 1987, pp. 355-366
  7. Dennis, A.R., and Kinney, S.T., 'Testing Media Richness Theory in the New Media: The Effects of Cues, Feedback, and Task Equivocality,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 9, No. 3, 1998, pp. 256-274 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.9.3.256
  8. DeSanctis, G., and Monge, P. 'Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication Process for Virtual Organizations,' Organization Science, Vol. 10, No. 6, 1999, pp. 693-703 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.693
  9. DeSanctis G., and Jackson, B. 'Coordination of Information Technology Management: Teambased structures and Computer-based Communication Systems,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1994, pp. 85-110 https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1994.11518021
  10. Ellison, N., Heino, R., Gibbs, J. 'Managing Impressions Online: Self-Presentation Processes in the Online Dating Environment, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2006, article 2
  11. Fornell, C., and Bookstein, F., 'Two Structural Equation Models: LISRELS and PLS Applied to Consumer Exit-Voice Theory,' Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 19, 1982, pp. 39-50
  12. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D., 'Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error,' Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, 1981, pp. 39-50 https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
  13. Fulk, J., Schmitz, J., and Steinfield, C.W., A Social Influence Model of Technology Use, Organizations and Communication Technology, J. Fulk and C.W. Steinfield (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, CA, 1990, pp. 117-140
  14. Gemino, A., Parker, D., and Kutzschan, A., 'Investigating Coherence and Multimedia Effects of a Technology-Mediated Collaborative Environment,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2005, pp. 97-121 https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222220304
  15. Gibson, C., and Cohen, S., Virtual Teams That Work: Creating Condition for Effective Virtual Teams, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (eds.) Wiley, 2003
  16. Goffman, E., Forms of Talk, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PA, 1981. Hiltz, S.R., and Johnson, K., 'User Satisfaction with Computer-mediated Communication Systems,' Management Science, Vol. 36, No. 6, 1990, pp. 739-764 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.36.6.739
  17. Hinds, P.J., and Bailey, D.E. 'Out of Sight, Out of Sync: Understanding Conflict in Distributed Teams,' Organization Science, Vol. 14, No. 6, 2003, pp. 615-632 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872
  18. Keller, R.T., 'Predictors of the Performance of Project Groups in R&D Organizations,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, No. 4, 1986, pp. 715-726 https://doi.org/10.2307/255941
  19. Kock, N., 'Media Richness or Media Naturalness? The Evolution of Our Biological Communication Apparatus and Its Influence on Our Behavior toward E-Communication Tools,' IEEE Transaction on Professional Communication, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2005, pp. 117-130 https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.849649
  20. Kock, N., 'The Psychological Model: Towards a New Theory of Computer-Mediated Communication Based on Darwinian Evolution,' Organization Science, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2004, pp. 327-348 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0071
  21. Kraut, R.E., and Higgins, E.T., 'Communication and Social Cognition,' in Handbook of Social Cognition, R.S. Wyer Jr. and T.K. Sproull (eds.), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1984, pp. 437-453
  22. Lee, K.M., and Nass, C., 'The multiple Source Effect and Synthesized Speech: Doubly Disembodied Language as a Conceptual Framework,' Human Communication Research, Vol. 30, 2004, pp. 182-207
  23. Lee, A. S., 'Electronic Mail as a Medium for Rich Communication: An Empirical Investigation Using Hermeneutic Interpretation,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 2, 1994, pp. 143-157 https://doi.org/10.2307/249762
  24. Liu, Y., and Ginther, D., 'A Comparison of the Task-oriented Model and the Socialemotion- oriented Model in Computer-mediated Communication,' Southwestern Psychological Association's Conference in Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, 1999
  25. Majchrzak, A., Malhotra, A., and John, R., 'Perceived Individual Collaboration Knowhow Development through Information Technology- Enabled Contextualization: Evidence from Distributed Teams,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 16, No. 1, 2005, pp. 9-27 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0044
  26. Majchrzak, A., and Malhotra, A., 'Virtual Workspace Technologies,' MIT Sloan Management Review, Winter 2005, pp. 131-137
  27. McKinney, V.R., and Whiteside, M.M., 'Maintaining Distributed Relationships,' Communications of the ACM, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2006, pp. 82-86
  28. Ngwenyama, O.K., and Lee, A.S., 'Communication Richness in Electronic Mail: Critical Social Theory and the Contextuality of Meaning,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1997, pp. 145-167 https://doi.org/10.2307/249417
  29. Nowak, K.L., and Rauh, C., 'The Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction,' Journal of Computer- mediated Communication, Vol. 11, No. 1, 2005, pp. 1-24 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.tb00301.x
  30. Rice, R.E., The New Media: Communication, Research, and Technology, Sage, Newbury Park, CA 1984
  31. Short, J., Williams, E., and Christie, B., The Social Psychology of Telecommunications, John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., London, 1976
  32. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S.B., 'Reducing Social Context Cues: Electronic Mail in Organizational Communication,' Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 11, 1986, pp. 1492- 1512 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492
  33. Sproull, L., and Kiesler, S.B., Connections: New Way of Working in the Networked Organization, MIT Press Cambridge, MA, 1991
  34. Teeni, D., 'Review: A cognitive-affective Model of Organizational Communication for Designing IT,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 2, 2001, pp. 251-312 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250931
  35. Todd, P., and Benbasat, I., 'Evaluating the Impact of DSS, Cognitive Effort, and Incentives on Strategy Selection,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No. 4, 1999, pp. 356- 374 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.356
  36. Walther, J. B., and Burgoon, J. K., 'Relational Communication in Computer-mediated Interaction,' Human Communication Research, Vol. 19, 1992, pp. 50-88 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1992.tb00295.x
  37. Walther, J.B., 'Interpersonal Effects in Computer- mediated Interaction: A Relational Perspective,' Communication Research, Vol. 19, 1992, pp. 52-90 https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003
  38. Walther, J.B., 'Relational Aspects of Computermediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time,' Organization Science, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1995, pp. 186-203 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.6.2.186
  39. Walther, J.B., 'Computer-mediated Communication: Impersonal, Interpersonal, and Hyperpersonal Interaction,' Communication Research, Vol. 23, 1996, pp. 3-43 https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001001
  40. Wilson, J.M., Straus, S.G., and McEvily, B. 'All in Due Time: The Development of Trust in Computer-mediated and Face-to-face Teams,' Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Performance, 2005, Vol. 99, pp. 16-33
  41. Yoo, Y., and Alavi, M., 'Media and Group Cohesion: Relative Influences on Social Presence, Task Participation, and Group Consensus,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2001, pp. 371-390 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250922