DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation for High Strength Concrete using Pullout Test

인발법을 이용한 고강도 콘크리트 구조물의 강도평가방법

  • 고훈범 (인하공업전문대학 건축과)
  • Published : 2008.06.25

Abstract

Out of all the nondestructive test (NDT) methods, the pullout test is one of the most reliable techniques for estimating the strength of concrete under construction. However the pullout test inevitably produces significant surface damage because of the inherent test mechanism and costs too much for using measurement devices. In the view of construction engineers and inspectors, the main purpose of NDT methods for concrete is to verify whether the concrete strength of structure members exceeds the target strength or not. In this paper, a new pullout test method, which involves a pre-installed breaking bolt, with pre-determined breaking torques corresponding to the target strength of concrete, is introduced with related test data. The three types of test, the rebound hammer test, the pullout test, and the new pullout test with breaking bolt, were carried out on wall specimen with three types of concrete strengths. Our results show that concrete strength as evaluated by the pullout test with breaking bolt was similar with cylinder test results. Therefore it can be said that the new pullout test with breaking bolt is a useful method for checking the concrete strength without any surface damages in construction site.

Keywords

References

  1. 김규동외, Pull-Out Test를 이용한 콘크리트 구조물의 조기강도 평가기술, 한국콘크리트학회 2007년 봄학술발표회 논문집, 한국콘크리트학회, pp.1087-1090, 2007.4
  2. ACI committee 228, In-Place Methods to Estimate Concrete Strength, America concrete institute, pp. 6-9, Sep. 2004.
  3. ASTM, Standard Test Method for Pullout Strength of Hardened Concrete, (ASTM C 900-82), Annual Book of ASTM Standards, V. 04.02, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp.582-585. 1983.
  4. Bickley, J.A., The Variability of Pullout Tests and In-Place Concrete, Concrete International, 1982
  5. Kierkegaard-Hansen, P., Lok-Strength, Nordisk Betong (Stockholm), V.19, No.2, pp.9-11, 1975.
  6. Komatu et all., Variability of in-place Concrete Strength Evaluated by Pullout Test, Proc. JIA, No.1068, 1986(in Japanese)
  7. Leslie, J.R. and Cheesman, W.J., An Ultrasonic Method of Studying deteriorationand Cracking in Concrete Structures, ACI Journal (No.46-2), Sep. 1949
  8. Malhotra, V.M. and Carette, G., Comparison of Pullout Strength of Concrete with Compressive Strength of Cylinders and Cores, Pulse, Velocity, and Rebound Number, ACI JOURNAL, May-June, pp.161-170. 1980
  9. Ottosen, N.S., Non-linear Finite Element Analysis of Pull-out Test, Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, Vol.107, No.ST4, April 1981
  10. Popovics, S., Strength and Related Properties of Concrete, A Quantitative Approach, John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 535, 1998
  11. Richards, O., Pullout Strength of Concrete, Reproducibility and Accuracy of Mechanical Tests, STP-626, ASTM, Philadelphia, pp.32-40, 1977
  12. Stone, W.C., Carino, N.J., Comparison of Analytical with Experimental Internal Strain Distribution for the pullout Test, ACI Journal, Proc. V.81, No.1, pp.3-12, Jan.-Feb. 1984
  13. Stone, W.C., Carino, N.J. and Reeve, C.P. Statistical Methods for In-Place Strength Predictions by the Pullout Test, ACI Journal, Proc. V.83, No.5, Sep-Oct. 1986

Cited by

  1. Effectiveness of a Simplified Pullout Test Using a Post-Installable Break-Off Bolt vol.24, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/09349847.2012.675117
  2. Development of Post-installable Pullout Bolts and a Loading Device for Evaluating Concrete Strength vol.11, pp.3, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2011.06.3.229