DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of Al Crash Box for High Crashworthiness Enhancement

고충돌에너지 흡수용 알루미늄 크래쉬박스 개발

  • 유정수 ((주)성우하이텍 기술연구소) ;
  • 김석봉 (KAIST 기계항공시스템학부) ;
  • 이문용 ((주)성우하이텍 기술연구소) ;
  • 허훈 (KAIST 기계항공시스템학부)
  • Published : 2008.06.01

Abstract

Crash box is one of the most important automotive parts for crash energy absorption and is equipped at the front end of the front side member. The specific characteristics of aluminum alloys offer the possibility to design cost-effective lightweight structures with high stiffness and excellent crash energy absorption potential. This study deals with crashworthiness of aluminum crash box for an auto-body with the various types of cross section. For aluminum alloys, A17003-T7 and A17003-T5, the dynamic tensile test was carried out to apply for crash analysis at the range of strain from 0.003/sec to 200/sec. The crash analysis and the crash test were carried out for three cross sections of rectangle, hexagon and octagon. The analysis results show that the octagon cross section shape with A17003-T5 has higher crashworthiness than other cross section shapes. The effect of rib shapes in the cross section is important factor in crash analysis. Finally, new configuration of crash box with high crash energy absorption was suggested.

Keywords

References

  1. W. J. Kang, H. Huh, 2000, Crash Analysis of Autobody Structures Considering the Strain-rate Hardening Effect, Int. J. Automotive Technology, 1(1), pp. 35-41
  2. P. Furrer, R. Jones, 2004, Aluminum Crash Management Systems, SAE Int, 1, p. 1612
  3. M. Langsety, O. S. Hopperstad, 1997, Local Buckling of Square Thin-walled Aluminum Extrusions, Thin-walled structures, 27(1), pp. 117-126 https://doi.org/10.1016/0263-8231(96)00007-9
  4. T. Wierzbicki, W. Abramowicz, 1983, On the Crushing Mechanics of Thin-walled structures, J. Applied Mechanics, 50, pp. 727-734 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3167137
  5. W. Abramowicz, T. Wierzbicki, 1989, Axial Crushing of Multicorner Sheet Metal Columns, J. Applied Mechanics, 56(1), pp. 113-120 https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3176030
  6. A. G. Mamalis, D. E. Manolakos, M. B. Ioannidis, P. K. Kostazos, C. Dimitriou, 2003, Finite Element Simulation of the Axial Collapse of Metallic Thinwalled Tubes with Octagonal Cross-section, Thin-Walled Structures, 41, pp. 891-900 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-8231(03)00046-6
  7. M. Yamashita, M. Gotoh, Y. Sawairi, 2003, Axial Crush of Hollow Cylindrical Structures with Various Polygonal Cross-sections Numerical Simulation and Experiment, J. Materials Technology, 140, pp. 59-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(03)00821-5
  8. H. J. Lee, J. H. Song, S. S. Cho, H. Huh, S. H. Park, 2006, A Study on the Strain-Rate Sensitivity According to the Temperature for Steel Sheet of an Auto-Body, Transactions of KSTP, 15(2), pp. 132-137 https://doi.org/10.5228/KSPP.2006.15.2.132
  9. RCAR, 1992, Evaluation manual of damageability and reparability for low speed 15 km/h 40% offset crash test
  10. Porsche Engineering Services, ULSAB-AVC Engineering Reports, 2001

Cited by

  1. Crash Performance of a Straight Member for Various Section Shapes and Local Reinforcement vol.21, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.7467/KSAE.2013.21.5.097
  2. Low Speed Crash Behaviour of Aluminium Bumper System W.R.T. Design Variables vol.25, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7467/KSAE.2017.25.1.011
  3. Impact Performance of a Crash Member Filled with Aluminum Foam vol.20, pp.8, 2011, https://doi.org/10.5228/KSTP.2011.20.8.555