Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Near-fault ground motion effects on the nonlinear response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems

  • Received : 2006.10.02
  • Accepted : 2007.11.26
  • Published : 2008.03.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Ground motions in near source region of large crustal earthquakes are significantly affected by rupture directivity and tectonic fling. These effects are the strongest at longer periods and they can have a significant impact on Engineering Structures. In this paper, it is aimed to determine near-fault ground motion effects on the nonlinear response of dams including dam-reservoir-foundation interaction. Four different types of dam, which are gravity, arch, concrete faced rockfill and clay core rockfill dams, are selected to investigate the near-fault ground motion effects on dam responses. The behavior of reservoir is taken into account by using Lagrangian approach. Strong ground motion records of Duzce (1999), Northridge (1994) and Erzincan (1992) earthquakes are selected for the analyses. Displacements, maximum and minimum principal stresses are determined by using the finite element method. The displacements and principal stresses obtained from the four different dam types subjected to these nearfault strong-ground motions are compared with each other. It is seen from the results that near-fault ground motions have different impacts on the dam types.

Keywords

References

  1. Agrawal, A.K. and He, W.-L. (2002), "A closed-form approximation of near-fault ground motion pulses for flexible structures", 15th ASCE Engineering Mechanics Conference, New York.
  2. Aki, K. (1968), "Seismic displacement near a fault", J Geophys. Res., 64, 321-342.
  3. Akkas, N., Akay, H.U. and Ylmaz, C. (1979), "Applicability of general-purpose finite element programs in solid-fluid interaction problems", Comput. Struct., 10, 773-783. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(79)90041-5
  4. Anderson, J.C. and Bertero, VV (1987), "Uncertainties in establishing design earthquakes", J Struct. Eng., 113, 1709-1724. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1987)113:8(1709)
  5. ANSYS (2003), Swanson Analysis System, US.
  6. Araujo, J.M. and Awruch, A.M. (1998), "Probabilistic finite element analysis of concrete gravity dams", Adv Eng. Software, 29, 97-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-9978(98)00052-0
  7. Arch Dams (1968), A Review of British Research and Development, Proc. of the Symposium Held at the Institution of Civil Engineers, London, England.
  8. Archuleta, R.J. and Hartzell, S.H. (1981), "Effect of fault finiteness on near-source ground motion", Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 71, 939-957.
  9. Bathe, K.J. (1996), Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
  10. Bayraktar, A., Dumanolu, A.A. and Calayr, Y. (1996), "Asynchronous dynamic analysis of dam-reservoir-foundation systems by the Lagrangian approach", Comput. Struct., 58, 925-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00211-X
  11. Bayraktar, A., Hancer, E. and Akkose, M. (2005), "Influence of base-rock characteristics on the stochastic dynamic response of dam-reservoir-foundation systems", Eng. Struct., 27, 1498-1508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.05.004
  12. Bayraktar, A., Hancer, E. and Dumanolu, A.A. (2005), "Comparison of stochastic and deterministic dynamic responses of gravity dam-reservoir systems using fluid finite elements", Finite Elem. Anal. Des., 41, 1365-1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2005.02.004
  13. Bertero, VV, Mahin, S.A. and Herrera, R.A. (1978), "A seismic desing implications of near-fault San Fernando earthquake records", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 6, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060105
  14. Bray, J.D. and Marek, A.R. (2004), "Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region", Soil D. Earthq. Eng., 24, 815-828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.05.001
  15. Calayr, Y. (1994), Dynamic Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams using the Eulerian and Lagrangian Approaches, Ph.D. Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey, (in Turkish).
  16. Calayr, Y, Dumanolu, A.A. and Bayraktar, A. (1996), Earthquake analysis of gravity dam-reservoir systems using the Eulerian and Lagrangian approaches", Comput. Struct., 59, 877-890. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(95)00309-6
  17. Chopra, A.K. (1968), "Earthquake behavior of reservoir-dam systems", J. Eng. Mech. Div., 1475-1500.
  18. Chopra, A.K. and Chakrabarti, P. (1981), "Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including dam-water-foundation rock interaction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 9, 363-383. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290090406
  19. Chopra, A.K. and Chintanapakdee, C. (2001), "Comparing response of SDF systems to near-falt and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions", Earthq. Eng. Struct D., 30, 1769-1789. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.92
  20. Clough, R.W and Penzien, J. (1975), Dynamics of Structures, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  21. Corigliano, M., Lai, C.G and Barla, G (2006), "Seismic response of rock tunnels in near-fault conditions", First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Switzerland.
  22. Dicleli, M. and Buddaram, S. (2006), "Equivalent linear analysis of seismic-isolated bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions with forward rupture directivity effect", Eng. Struct., (in press).
  23. DSI (2006), General Directorate of State Hydraulic, Ankara, Turkey, http://www.dsi.gov.tr/english/.
  24. Fenves, G and Chopra, A.K. (1984), "Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including reservoir bottom absorption and dam-water-foundation rock interaction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 12, 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290120507
  25. Fenves, G and Chopra, A.K. (1984), "Earthquake analysis of concrete gravity dams including reservoir bottom absorption and dam-water-foundation rock interaction", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 12, 663-680. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290120507
  26. Finn, W.D.L. and Varolu, E. (1973), "Dynamics of gravity dam-reservoir systems", Comput. Struct., 3, 913-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(73)90066-7
  27. Galal, K. and Ghobarah, A. (2006), "Effect of near-fault earthquakes on North American nuclear design spectra", Nucl. Eng. Des., 236,1928-1936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2006.02.002
  28. Ghahari, F., Jahankhah, H. and Ghannad, M.A. (2006), "The effect of background record on response of structures subjected to near-fault ground motions", First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Switzerland.
  29. Greeves, E.J. (1991), "The modeling and analysis of linear and nonlinear fluid-structure systems with particular reference to concrete dams", Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  30. Greeves, E.J. and Dumanolu, A.A. (1989), "The implementation of an efficient computer analysis for fluid-structure interaction using the Eulerian approach within SAP-IV", Department of Civil Engineering, University of Bristol, Bristol.
  31. Hall, J.F., Heaton, T.H., Hailing, M.W and Wald, D.J. (1995), "Near-source ground motion and its effects on flexible buildings", Earthq. Spectra, 11, 569-605. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1585828
  32. http://www.usbr.gov/dataweb/dams/cal0148.htm, 2007.
  33. Liao, W.-I., Loh, C.-H. and Lee, B.-H. (2004), "Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions", Eng. Struct., 26, 2173-2183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.016
  34. Makris, N. (1997), "Rigidity-plasticity-viscosity: Can electrorheological dampers protect baseisolated structures from near-source ground motions?", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 26, 571-591. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199705)26:5<571::AID-EQE658>3.0.CO;2-6
  35. Megawati, K., Higashihara, H. and Koketsu, K. (2001), "Derivation of near-source ground motions of the 1995 Kobe (Hyogo-ken Nanbu) earthquake from vibration records of the Akashi Kaikyo Bridge and its implications", Eng. Struct., 23, 1256-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00029-3
  36. Ozturk, B. (2006), "A simple procedure for the assessment of seismic drift response of building structures located in seismically active and near-fault regions", First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Switzerland.
  37. PEER (Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre) (2006), http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data.
  38. Pulido, N. and Kubo, T. (2004), "Near-fault strong motion complexity of the 2000 Tottori earthquake (Japan) from a broadband source asperity model", Tectonophysics, 390, 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2004.03.032
  39. Saini, S.S., Bettess, P and Zienkiewicz, O.C. (1978), "Coupled hydrodynamic response of concrete gravity dams using finite and infinite elements", Earthq. Eng. Struct D., 6, 363-374. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290060404
  40. Singhal, A.C. (1991), "Comparison of computer codes for seismic analysis of dams", Comput. Struct., 38, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7949(91)90128-9
  41. Somerville, PG. (2003), "Magnitude scaling of the near fault rupture directivity pulse", Phys. Earth Planet. In., 137, 201-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-9201(03)00015-3
  42. Somerville, P.G, Smith, N.F., Graves, R.W and Abrahamson, N.A. (1997), "Abrahamson, Modification of empirical strong ground motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity", Seismic. Res. Lett., 68, 199-222. https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.68.1.199
  43. US Army Corps of Engineers (2003), Time-history dynamic analysis of concrete hydraulic h-structures, Engineering and Design.
  44. Wang, G-Q., Zhou, X.-Y., Zhang, P.-Z. and Igel, H. (2002), "Characteristics of amplitude and duration for near fault strong ground motion from the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake", Soil D. Earthq. Eng., 22, 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(01)00047-1
  45. Wilson, E.L. and Khalvati, M. (1983), "Finite elements for the dynamic analysis of fluid-solid systems", Int. J. Numer Meth. Eng., 19,1657-1668. https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620191105
  46. Zangar, C.N. and Haefei, R.J. (1952), "Electric analog indicates effects of horizontal earthquake shock on dams", Civil Eng., 4, 54-55.
  47. Zienkiewicz, O.C. and Nath, B. (1963), "Earthquake hydrodynamic pressures on arch dams-an electric analogue solution", In Proc. of Int. Civil Eng. Congress, 25, 165-176.

Cited by

  1. Nonlinear finite element reliability analysis of Concrete-Faced Rockfill (CFR) dams under static effects vol.36, pp.11, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.004
  2. Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges vol.64, pp.1, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0259-5
  3. Non-linear earthquake response of CFR DAM–reservoir–foundation systems vol.19, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2012.759595
  4. Seismic failure probability of concrete slab on CFR dams with welded and friction contacts by response surface method vol.30, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.06.013
  5. Structure analysis for concrete-faced rockfill dams based on information entropy theory and finite element method vol.36, pp.8, 2012, https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1040
  6. Earthquake Damage Analysis of Concrete Gravity Dams: Modeling and Behavior under Near-Fault Seismic Excitations vol.19, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2015.1027019
  7. Dynamic response of concrete gravity dams using different water modelling approaches: westergaard, lagrange and euler vol.16, pp.3, 2015, https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2015.16.3.429
  8. Effects of Base and Lift Joints on the Dynamic Response of Concrete Gravity Dams to Pulse-Like Excitations vol.21, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1185056
  9. The effect of concrete slab–rockfill interface behavior on the earthquake performance of a CFR dam vol.46, pp.1, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2010.07.001
  10. Non-linear response of the rockfill in a concrete-faced rockfill dam under seismic excitation vol.21, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1080/13873954.2014.898157
  11. Seismic performance evaluation of dam-reservoir-foundation systems to near-fault ground motions vol.72, pp.2, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-1028-9
  12. Nonlinear seismic response of a gravity dam under near-fault ground motions and equivalent pulses vol.92, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.11.003
  13. Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water-sediment-foundation interaction vol.34, pp.11, 2010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.019
  14. Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams vol.53, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014
  15. Probabilistic nonlinear analysis of CFR dams by MCS using Response Surface Method vol.35, pp.6, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.12.003
  16. Seismic vulnerability of gravity dams in near-fault areas vol.102, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.020
  17. Finite element model updating effects on nonlinear seismic response of arch dam–reservoir–foundation systems vol.47, pp.2, 2011, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finel.2010.09.005
  18. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of two suspension bridges in Istanbul, Turkey to near- and far-fault ground motion vol.12, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-459-2012
  19. Damage mechanics approach and modeling nonuniform cracking within finite elements for safety evaluation of concrete dams in 3D space vol.33, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2009.33.1.031
  20. Seismic response of concrete gravity dam-ice covered reservoir-foundation interaction systems vol.36, pp.4, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2010.36.4.499
  21. Dam-reservoir-foundation interaction effects on the modal characteristic of concrete gravity dams vol.38, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.38.1.065
  22. Influence of near-fault ground motions characteristics on elastic seismic response of asymmetric buildings vol.40, pp.4, 2011, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2011.40.4.489
  23. A nonlinear analysis of dynamic interactions of CFRD–compressible reservoir system based on FEM–SBFEM vol.112, pp.None, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.04.057
  24. An approach for deformation modulus mechanism of super-high arch dams vol.69, pp.5, 2008, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.69.5.557
  25. Nonlinear Dynamic Response of a CC-RCC Combined Dam Structure under Oblique Incidence of Near-Fault Ground Motions vol.10, pp.3, 2008, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10030885
  26. Probabilistic seismic assessment of steel gabled frames with web-tapered members under near-fault ground motions along strike-normal and strike-parallel components vol.34, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.10.007
  27. Comparison of homogenous and random fields of tensile strength effects on the nonlinear dynamical response of Guandi concrete gravity dams under strong earthquake waves vol.17, pp.12, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2020.1832534
  28. Seismic Performance Evaluation of Concrete Gravity Dams in Finite-Element Framework vol.27, pp.1, 2008, https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)sc.1943-5576.0000656