DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Ultimate Strength of Concrete Barrier by the Yield Line Theory

  • 발행 : 2008.06.30

초록

When the yield line theory is used to estimate the ultimate strength of a concrete barrier, it is of primary importance that the correct assumption is made for the failure mode of the barrier. In this study, a static test was performed on two full-scale concrete barrier specimens of Korean standard shape that simulate the actual behavior of a longitudinally continuous barrier. This was conducted in order to verify the failure mode presented in the AASHTO LRFD specification. The resulting shape of the yield lines differed from that presented in AASHTO when subjected to an equivalent crash load. Furthermore, the ultimate strengths of the specimens were lower than the theoretical prediction. The main causes of these differences can be attributed to the characteristics of the barrier shape and to a number of limitations associated with the classical yield line theory. Therefore, a revised failure mode with corresponding prediction equations of the strength were proposed based on the yield lines observed in the test. As a result, a strength that was more comparable to that of the test could be obtained. The proposed procedure can be used to establish more realistic test levels for barriers that have a similar shape.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Korea Road and Transportation Association, Highway Bridge Design Code, KRTA, 2005
  2. Ministry of Construction and Traffic, Guideline for Installation and Management of Road Safety Facilities, MOCT, 2001
  3. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, 4th Ed., AASHTO, 2007
  4. Korea Highway Corporation, Review of Design Methods of the Concrete Barrier on the Bridge, Korea Highway Corporation, 2002
  5. Ross, H. E., Jr., Sicking, D. L., Zimmer, R. A., and Michie, J. D., Recommended Procedures for the Safety Performance Evaluation of Highway Features, National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 350, Transportation Research Board & National Research Council, 1993
  6. Hirsch, T. J., Analytical Evaluation of Texas Bridge Rails to Contain Buses and Trucks, Research Report 20-2, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University, 1978
  7. Nielsen, M. P., Limit Analysis and Concrete Plasticity, 2nd Ed., CRC Press, 1999
  8. Korea Highway Corporation, A Study on the Design and the Performance Improvement of Cantilever Part in Bridge Deck with Concrete Rigid Barrier, Korea Highway Corporation, 2004
  9. Woo, K. S., Kim, J. I., Ra, J. S., and Ahn, S. S., "Dynamic Impact Load and Performance Evaluation of Concrete Rigid Barriers," Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 24, No. 5A, 2004, pp. 1053-1063
  10. Kang, J. W., Lee, J. H., Woo, K. S., Ahn, S. S., and Lee, I. G., "A Static Test of Concrete Barrier on Bridge Deck," Proceedings of the Korea Concrete Institute, Vol. 16, No. 2, 2004, pp. 33-36
  11. ABAQUS/Standard 6.3-User's Manual, Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen, Inc., 2002
  12. Jeon, S. J., Choi, M. S., Kim, Y. J., and Hyun, B. H., "Static Test of Precast Concrete Barrier I. Ultimate Behavior and Test Level," Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27, No. 6A, 2007, pp. 891-899
  13. Jeon, S. J., Choi, M. S., and Kim, Y. J., "Static Test of Precast Concrete Barrier II. Analysis of the Measured Data," Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 27, No. 6A, 2007, pp. 901-908

피인용 문헌

  1. Concrete road barriers subjected to impact loads: An overview vol.12, pp.10, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-78251783