DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Learning Tagging Ontology from Large Tagging Data

대규모 태깅 데이터를 이용한 태깅 온톨로지 학습

  • 강신재 (대구대학교 컴퓨터.IT공학부)
  • Published : 2008.04.25

Abstract

This paper presents a learning method of tagging ontology using large tagging data such as a folksonomy, which stands for classification structure informally created by the people. There is no common agreement about the semantics of a tagging, and most social web sites internally use different methods to represent tagging information, obstructing interoperability between sites and the automated processing by software agents. To solve this problem, we need a tagging ontology, defined by analyzing intrinsic attributes of a tagging. Through several machine learning for tagging data, tag groups and similar user groups are extracted, and then used to learn the tagging ontology. A recommender system adopting the tagging ontology is also suggested as an applying field.

본 논문은 대중에 의해 자유롭게 생성된 분류 체계인 폭소노미, 즉 대규모의 태깅 데이터로부터 태깅 온톨로지를 학습하는 방법을 제시하고 있다. 기존 소셜웹 시스템간에는 태깅의 의미에 대해 공통의 합의가 이루어지지 않았기 때문에, 시스템마다 태깅 정보를 표현하기 위해 내부적으로 다른 방법을 쓰고 있으며, 따라서 소프트웨어 에이전트를 이용하여 시스템간의 정보처리를 자동으로 할 수가 없다. 이를 해결하는 방법으로 폭소노미를 위한 태깅 온톨로지가 필요하다. 태깅의 본질적인 속성을 분석하여 태깅 온톨로지를 정의하고, 태깅 데이터의 기계 학습을 통하여 유사 태그와 사용자 그룹 정보를 획득한 후, 태깅 온톨로지를 학습한다. 이의 활용 방안으로 학습된 태깅 온톨로지를 이용하여 모델링한 추천 시스템도 제안한다.

Keywords

References

  1. http://ko.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del.icio.us
  2. S. Gloder, and B. A. Huberman, "Usage Patterns of Collaborative Tagging Systems." Journal of Information Science, Vol.32, No.2, pp. 198-208, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506062337
  3. T. V. Wal, Folksonomy Explanations, http://www.vanderwal.net/random/ entrysel.php?blog=1622, 2005
  4. T. R. Gruber, "Towards Principles for the Design of Ontologies used for Knowledge Sharing", International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol.43, pp.907-928, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1995.1081
  5. F. Manola, and E. Miller, RDF Primer, W3C, http://www.w3.org/TR/ rdf-primer, 2004
  6. L. Miller, and D. Brickley, Friend of a Friend project, http://www.foaf- project.org, 2000
  7. C. Fellbaum, WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database (Language, Speech, and Communication), MIT press, 1998
  8. I. H. Witten, and E. Frank, Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and Techniques (2nd Edition), Morgan Kaufmann, 2005
  9. D. Pelleg, and A. W. Moore, "X-means: Extending K-means with Efficient Estimation of the Number of Clusters", In 17th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.727-734, 2000
  10. G. Adomavicius, and A. Tuzhilin, "Toward the Next Generation of Recommender Systems: A Survey of the State-of-the-Art and Possible Extensions", IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol.17, No.6, June 2005
  11. K. Aberer and et al., "Emergent Semantics Principles and Issues", Proceedings of Database Systems for Advanced Applications (DASFAA2004), LNCS 2973, pp.25-38, 2004
  12. P. Mika, "Ontologies Are Us: A Unified Model of Social Networks and Semantics", Proceedings of the 4th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2005), LNCS 3729, pp.522-536, 2005
  13. T. R. Gruber, "Ontology of Folksonomy: A Mash-up of Apples and Oranges," International Journal of Semantic Web and Information Systems, Vol.3, No.1, pp.1-11, 2007
  14. X. Xu, L. Zhang, and Y. Yu, "Exploring Social Annotations for the Semantic Web", Proceedings of the 15th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW2006), New York, USA, pp.417-426, 2006
  15. T. Knerr, "Tagging Ontology - Towards a Common Ontology for Folksonomies", http://code.google.com/p/tagont, 2006
  16. L. Specia, and E. Motta, "Integrating Folksonomies with the Semantic Web", Proceedings of the 4th European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC2007), Innsbruck, Austria, 2007