The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Soft tissue change of the midface in skeletal class III orthognathic surgery patients

골격성 III급 부정교합자에서 상악골 전진술을 동반한 양악 수술 시 중안면 연조직 형태의 변화

  • Jung, Jong-Hyun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Sik (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Son, Woo-Sung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Park, Soo-Byung (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • 정종현 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 김성식 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 손우성 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실) ;
  • 박수병 (부산대학교 치의학전문대학원 치과교정학교실)
  • Published : 2008.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The first objective of this study was to compare the upper midface morpholgy, focusing on the soft tissues, between skeletal Class III maloccusion patients with midfacial depression and the norm. The second objective was to estimate and analyze the change in the upper midface soft tissues following surgical correction with maxillary advancement by Lefort I osteotomy and mandibular setback by bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSRO). Methods: The samples consisted of 34 adult patients (15 males and 12 females) with an average age of 21 years, who had severe anteroposterior discrepancy with midfacial depression. These patients had received presurgical orthodontic treatment and surgical treatment which consisted of simultaneous Lefort I osteotomy and BSSRO. Results: The correlation coefficient between changes in maxillary advancement and changes in Or' (soft tissue orbitale) was 0.599 (p < 0.05). Change in maxillary plane angle and vertical change of the maxilla were not correlated with the change in Or' (p < 0.05). The ratio of soft tissue change in Or' to maxillary advancement was 43.57 %, and 81.54 % in Sn. Regression equations between maxillary movement and Or' were devised. The $r^2$ value was 0.476. Conclusions: The majority of measurements in the upper midface in skeletal Class III maloccusions when compared to the norm, showed significant differences. In Class III malocclusion with midfacial depression, maxillary advancement produces soft tissue change in the upper midface.

본 연구는 중안면 함몰이 있는 골격성 III급 부정교합자의 중안면의 형태를 정상 표본과 비교하고, 악교정수술에 의하여 연조직이 어떤 변화를 보이는 지를 알아보기 위하여 시행하였다. 골격성 III급 부정교합으로 진단 받고 상악 전진술과 하악 후퇴술을 시행 받은 환자 34명(남자:15명, 여자:19명)을 대상으로 수술 전후 측모 두부방사선 계측사진을 분석하였다. 골격성 III급 부정교합자의 중안면의 경조직 계측치 S'-Or, Or${\bot}$NA, S'Or/SN, ${\angle}$SNOr에서 남녀모두에서 정상 교합자와 큰 차이가 있었다. 상악골이 평균 5.03 mm 전방이동 될 때 연조직 Orbitale는 2.26 mm전방으로 이동하였으며 상관계수는 0.599였다 (p<0.05). 상악 평면각의 변화(시계방향으로 회전)와 상악골의 수직이동은 연조직 Orbitale의 전방이동과 유의성있는 상관관계가 없었다. 상악골 전방이동에 대한 연조직 Orbitale와 Subnasale의 전방이동 비율은 각각 43.57%, 81.54%였다. 이상의 결과에서 중안면 함몰이 있는 환자는 상악골 전방이동시 상순과 비부 외에도 연조직 Orbitale를 포함한 중안면 연조직이 전방으로 이동하지만, 상악골의 회전이동 및 수직이동에 대해서는 연조직의 변화량이 적었다는 것을 알 수 있었다. 이는 상악골의 수술에 따른 중안면 함몰의 해소를 예측하는데 도움이 될 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Vasir NS, Thompson RT, Davies TM. Dental and skeletal changes following sagittal split osteotomy for correction of mandibular prognathism. Eur J Orthod 1991;13:134-42 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.2.134
  2. McNeill RW, Proffit WR, White RP. Cephalometric prediction for orthodontic surgery. Angle Orthod 1972;42:154-64
  3. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978;36:269-77
  4. Sung OJ, Kyung HM, Kwon OW, Sung JH. Cephalometric norms for orthognathic surgery. Korean J Orthod 1989;19:169-185
  5. Choe YK, Suhr CH. Hard and soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery of mandibular prognathism. Korean J Orthod 1993;23:707-24
  6. Louis PJ, Austin RB, Waite PD, Mathews CS. Soft tissue changes of the upper lip associated with maxillary advancement in obstructive sleep apnea patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2001;59:151-6 https://doi.org/10.1053/joms.2001.20485
  7. Stella JP, Streater MR, Epker BN, Sinn DP. Predictability of upper lip soft tissue changes with maxillary advancement. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;47:697-703 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(89)80008-4
  8. Betts NJ, Vig P, Spalding P. Fonseca RJ. Changes in the nasal and soft tissues after surgical repositioning of the maxilla. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1993;8:7-23
  9. Westermark AH, Bystedt H, von Konow L, Sallstrom KO. Nasolabial morphology after Le Fort I osteotomies. Effect of alar base suture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;20:25-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0901-5027(05)80690-3
  10. Mansour S, Burstone C, Legan H. An evaluation of soft-tissue changes resulting from Le Fort I maxillary surgery. Am J Orthod 1983;84:37-47 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90146-X
  11. Wolford LM. Discussion for lip-nasal aesthetics following Le Fort I osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;81:180-2 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198802000-00006
  12. Dann JJ 3rd, Fonseca RJ, Bell WH. Soft tissue changes associated with total maxillary advancement: a preliminary study. J Oral Surg 1976;34:19-23
  13. Choi YS, Son WS. A comparative study on the postsurgical changes between one jaw surgery and two-jaw surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion patient. Korean J Orthod 1997;27:297-313
  14. Chang IH, Lee YJ, Park YG. A comparative study of soft tissue changes with mandibular one jaw surgery and double jaw surgery in Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 2006;36:63-73
  15. Park HJ, Choi HR, Ryu SY. Soft tissue changes following bimaxillary surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion patients. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Recontr Surg 1998;20:284-90
  16. Cho EJ, Yang WS. Soft tissue changes after double jaw surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion. Korean J Orthod 1996;26:1-16
  17. Zide B, Grayson B, McCarthy JG. Cephalometric analysis for upper and lower midface surgery: Part II. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981;68:961-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-198112000-00026
  18. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:299-312 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(93)70010-L
  19. Arnett GW, Bergman RT. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;103:395-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81791-3
  20. Arnett GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, Cummings DR, Beress A, Worley CM Jr, Chung B, Bergman R. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:239-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70234-9
  21. Kang SG, Lee YJ, Park YG. A comparative study of soft tissue profile between Korean and Caucasian young adults under NHP. Korean J Orthod 2003;33:323-37
  22. Lee EH, Chung IK. A lateral cephalometric analysis of midface focusing on zygomatic bone in Korean adults. J Korean Assoc Maxillofac Plast Recontr Surg 1999;21:353-9
  23. Riedel R. Esthetics and its relation to orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod 1950;20:168-78
  24. Proffit WR, Phillips C, Turvey TA. Stability after surgicalorthodontic corrective of skeletal Class III malocclusion. 3. Combined maxillary and mandibular procedures. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1991;6:211-25
  25. Leonard M, Walker GF. A cephalometric guide to the diagnosis of midface hypoplasia at the Le Fort II level. J Oral Surg 1977;35:21-4
  26. Boom LA. Perioral profile changes in orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1961;47:371-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(61)90177-4
  27. Denis KL, Speidel TM. Comparison of three methods of profile change prediction in the adult orthodontic patient. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:396-402 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(87)90260-5
  28. Gjorup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:312-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(91)70068-8
  29. Betts NJ, Vig KW, Vig P, Spalding P, Fonseca RJ. Changes in the nasal and labial soft tissues after surgical repositioning of the maxilla. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1993;8:7-23
  30. Willmot DR. Soft tissue profile changes following correction of class III malocclusions by mandibular surgery. Br J Orthod 1981;8:175-81 https://doi.org/10.1179/bjo.8.4.175
  31. Sarver DM, Ackerman MB. Dynamic smile visualization and quantification: Part 2. Smile analysis and treatment strategies. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:116-27 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00307-X
  32. Han SY, Baik HS, Kim KD, Yu HS. Facial soft tissue measuring analysis of normal occlusion using three-dimensional CT imaging. Korean J Orthod 2005;35:409-419
  33. Bell WH. Modern practice in orthognathic and reconstructive surgery. St Louis: WB Saunders; 1992. p.2235-97
  34. Abubaker AO, Sotereanos GC. Modified Le Fort I (maxillaryzygomatic) osteotomy: rationale, basis, and surgical technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:1089-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90144-B
  35. Norholt SE, Sindet-Pedersen S, Jensen J. An extended Le Fort I osteotomy for correction of midface hypoplasia: a modified technique and results in 35 patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996;54:1297-304 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(96)90486-3
  36. Choung PH. A new midface plastic surgery technique: Development of intraoral Le Fort III, II and I composite osteotomy technique. J Korean Dent Assoc 1997;35:672-7
  37. Prendergast M, Schoenrock LD. Malar augmentation. Patient classification and placement. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1989;115:964-9 https://doi.org/10.1001/archotol.1989.01860320074022
  38. Brusati R, Sesenna E, Raffaini M. On the feasibility of intraoral maxillo-malar osteotomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1989;17:110-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1010-5182(89)80081-2
  39. Burstone CJ. The integumental profile. Am J Orthod 1958;44:1-25 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(58)90178-7
  40. Wolford LM, Hilliard FW, Dugan DJ. Surgical Treatment Objectives: A systematic Approach to the Prediction Tracing. St Louis: Mosby; 1985. p.54-74
  41. Hohl TH, Epker BN. Macrogenia: A study of treatment results with surgical recommendations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1976;41:545-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(76)90307-8