References
- Avery, L. D., VanTassel-Baska, J., & O'Neill, B.(1997). Making evaluation work: One school district's experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41(4), 124-132 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629704100402
- Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K.(2006). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
- Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University
- Borland, J. H. (1997). Evaluating gifted programs. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (2nd Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 253-268). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon
- Coleman, J., & Fults, B. (1985). Self-concept and the gifted classroom: The role of social comparisons. Gifted Child Quarterly, 26, 116-120 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628202600305
- Callahan, C. M.(1992). Determining the effectiveness of educational services: Assessment issues. In Challenges in gifted education: Developing potential and investing in knowledge for the 21st century(pp. 109-114). Columbus Ohio State Department of Education. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED301131)
- Callahan, C. M.(2004). Program evaluation in gifted education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
- Davalos, R. A., & Haensly, P. A.(1997). After the dust has settled: Youth reflect on their high school mentored research experience. Roeper Review, 19, 204-207 https://doi.org/10.1080/02783199709553830
- Feldhusen, J. E. (1985). Toward excellence in Gifted Education. Denver, Colorado: Love Publishing Co.
- Fetterman, D. M. (1993). Evaluate yourself. Storrs, CT: National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented
- Feng, A. X., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2003). Designing and utilizing evaluation forgifted program improvement. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Co.
- Ford, D.(1995). Desegregating gifted education: A need unmet. Journal of Negro Education, 64, 52-60 https://doi.org/10.2307/2967284
- Greene, J.(1994). Qualitative program evaluation: Practice and promise. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 530-544). Thousand Oaks. CA: Sage
- Hertzog, N. B.(2003). Impact of gifted program from the students' perspectives. Gifted Child Quarterly, 47(2), 131-143 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620304700204
- Kulik, J., & Kulik, C. (1992). Meta-analytic findings on grouping programs. Gifted Child Quarterly, 36, 73-77 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629203600204
- Landrum, M. S.(2001). An evaluation of the catalyst program: Consultation and collaboration in gifted education. Gifted Child Quarterly, 45(2), 139-151 https://doi.org/10.1177/001698620104500207
- Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (1994). The Study of Mathematically Precocious Youth (SMPY): The first three decades of a planned fifty-year longitudinal study of intellectual talent. In R. Subotnik & K. Arnold (Eds.). Beyond Terman: Longitudinal studies in contemporary gifted education (pp. 255-281). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
- Renzulli, J. (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the giftedand talented. Creative Learning Press
- Sapon-Shevin, M.(1993). Gifted education and the protection of privilege: Breakin the silence, opening the discourse. In L. Weiss & M. Fine(Eds.), Beyond silenced voices(pp. 45-73). Albany: State University of New York Press
- Shore, M. B., Cornell, A. R., & Ward, V. S.(1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. NY: Teachers College Press
- Smutny, J. F. (2002). Designing and developing programs for gifted students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press
- Swiatek, M. A., & Benbow, C. P. (1991). Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 3, 528-538
- Tannenbaum, A. (1983). Gifted Children. New York: Macmillan
- Treffinger, D. (2004). Enhancing and expanding gifted programs: The levels of service approach. Waco, TX: Prufrock Press Co.