References
- 강순민 (2004). 과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특징. 한국교원대학교박사학위논문
- 교육과학기술부(2008). 중학교 교육과정 해설(III) : 수학, 과학, 기술가정. 한솔사: 광주광역시
- 김기우, 김용재 (역)(1992). 서사론 사전. 민지사
- 김만희 (2003). 폴라니의 인시론에 근거한 과학교수의 내러티브적 성격 고찰. 한국교원대학교 박사학위논문
- 김익균, 박승재 (1992). 대립개념의 증거적 비판논의와 반성적 사고를 중심으로 한 물리 개념변화 모형. 한국과학교육학회지, 12(3), 77-89
- 박승재, 장병기 (1994). 광학 현상 증거 해석의 인과적 추론 방식. 한국과학교육학회지, 14(2), 123-132
- 양일호 (2003). 과학적 지식 생성 과정에서 사전지식과 과학적 사고의 역할. 초등교과교육연구, 4, 51-65
- 오필석 (2007). 중등학교 지구과학 교사들의 과학적 살명: 논리적 형식과 담화적 특징 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(1), 37-49
- 이선경 (2006). 소집단 토론에서 발생하는 학생들의 상호작용적 논증 유형 및 특징. 대한화학회지, 50(1), 79-88 https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2006.50.1.079
- 조희형 (1992). 과학적 탐구의 본질에 대한 분석 및 탐구력 신장을 위한 학습지도 방법에 관한 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 12(1), 61-73
- 한승희 (2005). 과학적 사고와 서사적 사고의 교육적 의미: 과학적 사고와 서사적 사고에서 추론과 정서. 교육과정연구, 23(2), 39-64
- Ahn, W. & Kalish, C. (2000). The role of mechanism beliefs in causal reasoning. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and Cognition (pp. 199- 226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Baram-Tsabari, A. & Yarden, A. (2005). Text genre as a factor in the formation of scientific literacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(4), 403-428 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20063
- Brewer, W. F., Chinn, C. A., & Samarapungavan, A. (2000). Explanation in scientists and children. In F. Keil & R. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
- Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, Possible worlds. Harvard University Press
- Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20157
- Dawson, C. & Rowell, J. (1987). The use of data in problem solving: The whys, whens and wherefores. Research in Science Education, 17, 1-10 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02357166
- De Bono. (1996). de Bono's thinking course. London: BBC Books
- DeLoache, J. S., Miller, K. F., & Pierroutsakos, S. L. (1998). Reasoning and problem solving. In D. Kuhn & R. S. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (vol. 2): Cognition, perception, and language (pp. 801-850). Wiley: New York
- Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-312 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200005)84:3<287::AID-SCE1>3.0.CO;2-A
- Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick, L. B. (ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, 13, 199-217
- Gauld, C. (1986). Model, meters and memory. Research in Science Education, 16, 49-54 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356817
- Gunstone, R. F. (1994). The importance of specific science content in the enhancement of metacognition. In P. Fensham, R., Gunstone & R. White (Eds.), The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning(pp. 131-146). Falmer Press: London
- Gunstone, R. F. & Northfield, J. (1992). Conceptual change in teacher education: The centrality of metacognition. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco: CA
- Hewson, P. W., & Thorley, N. R. (1989). The conditions of conceptual change in the classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 541-553 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110506
- Hewson P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for Conceptual Change. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 199-218). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer
- Kuhn, D. (1992). Thinking as argument. Havard Educational Review, 62(2), 155-178
- Kuhn, D. (1993). Science argument: Implications for teaching and learning scientific thinking. Science Education, 77(3), 319-337 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730770306
- Kuhn, D., Amsel, E., & O'Loughlin, M. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
- Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315 https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1503_1
- Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago University Press
- Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84, 71-94 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200001)84:1<71::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-C
- Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2006). Scientific thinking and scientific literacy: Supporting development in learning contexts. In W. Damon, R. Lerner, K. A. Renninger & I. E. Sigel (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 4. Child psychology in practice (6th ed., pp. 153-196). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons
- Millar, R. (1987). Towards a role for experiment in the science teaching laboratory. Studies in Science Education, 14, 109-118 https://doi.org/10.1080/03057268708559941
- Pritchard, C. L. (2005). Everyday and scientific thinking: How children adjust to contexts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Wisconsin-Madison
- Rief, F. & Larkin, J. (1991). Cognition in scientific and everyday domains: Comparison and learning implications. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 733-760
- Rozenblit, L. & Keil, F. (2002). The misunderstood limits of folk science: An illusion of explanatory depth. Cognitive Science, 92, 1-42
- Sadler, T. D. (2004). Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(5), 513-536 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20009
- Scribner, S. (1986). Thinking in action: Some characteristics of practical thought. In R. J. Sternberg & R. Wagner (Eds.), Practical intelligence (pp. 13-30). Cambridge: Cambrideg University Press
- Sebeok, T. A. & Umiker-Sebeok, J. (1983). You know my method: A juxtaposition of Charles C. Peirce and Sherlock Holmes, In U. Eco & T. A. Sebeok (Eds.), The sign of three: Dupin, Holmes, Peirce (pp. 11-54). Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
- Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Tweney, R. D. (1991). Informal reasoning in science. In J. F. Voss, D. N. Perkins, & J. W. Segal (Eds.), Informal reasoning and education (pp. 3-16). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
- Wendel, W. B. (2002). Mixed signals: Rational choice theories of social norms and the pragmatics of explanation. Indiana Law Journal, 77(1), 1-62
- White, R. T. & Gunstone, R. F. (1989). Metacognition and conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 577-586 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110509
- Wilson, R. A. & Keil, F. C. (2000). The shadows and shallows of explanation. In F. C. Keil & R. A. Wilson (Eds.), Explanation and Cognition (pp. 87-114). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
- Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99-149 https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497