한국과학교육학회지 (Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education)

  • 제28권8호
  • /
  • Pages.779-785
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1226-5187(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-8489(eISSN)
한국과학교육학회 (The Korean Association for Science Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

연소 개념 학습에서 변칙 사례에 의한 인지 갈등 및 상황 흥미가 개념 변화 과정에 미치는 영향

The Influences of Cognitive Conflict and Situational Interest by a Discrepant Event on the Conceptual Change Process in Learning the Concept of Combustion

  • 발행 : 2008.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구에서는 연소 개념 학습에서 변칙 사례의 역할을 인지적 동기적 측면에서 조사했다. 중학교 2학년 학생 433명을 대상으로 선개념 검사와 변칙 사례에 대한 반응 검사, 상황 흥미 검사를 실시했다. 연소 개념 학습을 실시한 후, 사후 검사로 주의집중, 노력, 개념 이해도 검사를 실시했다. 목표 오개념을 지닌 것으로 판별된 208명의 응답을 분석한 결과, 거부와 배제 반응의 비율은 밀도에 대한 선행연구의 결과와 비교하여 상대적으로 높은 반면, 신념 변화 반응의 비율은 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 경로 분석 결과, 대안 가설 제시 후의 상황 흥미가 직접적으로 또는 주의집중과 노력을 매개로 개념 이해도에 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 변칙 사례에 의해 유발된 상황 흥미는 대안 가설 제시 후의 인지 갈등에 직접적으로 영향을 미치기도 했다.

In this study, we investigated the role of a discrepant event from both cognitive and motivational perspectives in learning the concept of combustion. A preconception test, a test of response to a discrepant event, and a situational interest questionnaire were administered to 433 eighth graders. After learning the concept of combustion, the tests of attention, effort, and conceptual understanding were administered as post-tests. The reponses of 208 students who had been found to possess the target misconception were analyzed. The percentages of rejection and exclusion responses were relatively high compared to the previous studies about density concept, whereas a proportion of belief change was low. The results of the path analysis indicated that situational interest after presenting an alternative hypothesis had a direct effect and an indirect effect via attention and effort on conceptual understanding. Situational interest induced by a discrepant event directly influenced cognitive conflict after presenting an alternative hypothesis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 강훈식, 김민경, 노태희 (2007a). 인지갈등과 비인지적 변인이 개념 변화에 미치는 영향 및 변칙사례에 의해 유발된 상황 흥미의 근원. 한국과학교육학회지, 27(1), 18-27
  2. 강훈식, 최숙영, 노태희 (2007b). 대안가설이 도입된 인지갈등 전략에서 인지갈등 및 상황흥미와 학습 과정 변인이 개념변화에 미치는 영향. 대한화학회지, 51(3), 279-286 https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2007.51.3.279
  3. 김도욱 (1995). 연소에 대한 오개념 교정을 위한 과학사 프로그램의 적용 효과: 국민학교 예비교사를 대상으로. 초등과학교육, 14(2), 135-148
  4. 김범기, 권재술 (1995). 과학개념과 인지적 갈등의 유형이 학생들의 개념변화에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 15(4), 472-486
  5. 한문정 (1990). 연소와 녹스는 현상에 대한 학생들의 개념 조사: 초중고등학생을 대상으로. 서울대학교 대학원 석사 학위 논문
  6. Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
  7. BouJaoude, S. B. (1991). A study of the nature of students' understandings about the concept of burning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(8), 689-704 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280806
  8. Chen, A., Darst, P. W., & Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(3), 383-400 https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158578
  9. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (1998). An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
  10. Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Children's responses to anomalous scientific data: How is conceptual change impeded? Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 327-343 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.327
  11. Kang, S., Scharmann, L. C., & Noh, T. (2004). Reexamining the role of cognitive conflict in science concept learning. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 71-96 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RISE.0000021001.77568.b3
  12. Keller, J. M. (1993). IMMS: Instructional material motivation survey. Florida State University
  13. Lawson, A. E., Abraham, M. R., & Renner, J. W. (1989). A theory of instruction: Using the learning cycle to teach science concepts and thinking skills. NARST Monograph, No. 1. (ERIC Documentation Reproduction Service No. ED324204)
  14. Lee, G. H., Kwon, J. S., Park, S. S., Kim, J. W., Kwon, H. G., & Park, H. K. (2003). Development of an instrument for measuring cognitive conflict in secondarylevel science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(6), 585-603 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10099
  15. Limon, M. (2001). On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction, 11(4), 357-380 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(00)00037-2
  16. Malpass, J. R. (1994). A structural model of selfefficacy, goal orientation, worry, self-regulated learning, and high-stakes mathematics achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles
  17. Naylor, F. D. (1981). A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist, 16(2), 172-183 https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068108255893
  18. Niaz, M. (1995). Cognitive conflict as a teaching strategy in solving chemistry problem: A dialectic constructivist perceptive. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 959-970 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660320907
  19. Pearsall, N. R., Skipper, J. E., & Mintzes, J. J. (1997). Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in biology. Science Education, 81(2), 193-215 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199704)81:2<193::AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-A
  20. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). Motivational beliefs as resources for and constraints on conceptual change. In W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 33-50). Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd
  21. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730660207
  22. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, USA: Erlbaum
  23. She, H. C. (2002). Concepts of a higher hierarchical level require more dual situated learning events for conceptual change: A study of air pressure and buoyancy. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 981-996 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110098895
  24. Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The "Warming trend" in conceptual change research: The legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 107-115 https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_5
  25. Watson, J. R., Prieto, T., & Dillon, J. S. (1997). Consistency of students explanations about combustion. Science Education, 81(4), 425-443 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199707)81:4<425::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-E
  26. Zohar, A., & Aharon-Kravetsky, S. (2005). Exploring the effects of cognitive conflict and direct teaching for students of different academic levels. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(7), 829-855 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20075