Intravenous Remifentanil Infusion during EVLT for Varicose Vein

하지 정맥류에 대한 정맥내 레이저 치료시 레미펜타닐의 사용

  • Hwang, Seong-Wook (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Sohn, Dong-Suep (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University) ;
  • Cho, Dai-Yun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University)
  • 황성욱 (중앙대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 손동섭 (중앙대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 조대윤 (중앙대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실)
  • Published : 2008.04.05

Abstract

Background: We compared the analgesic effects of an intravenous infusion of remifentanil with local lidocaine injection during endovenous laser treatments (EVLT) for varicose veins. Material and Method: In order to compare the efficacy of analgesia between the lidocaine group (n=15) and the remifentanil group (n=15), we measure the pain intensity of the patients, with using the visual analogue scale, during EVLT and at the first week, the second week, the third week and the fourth week after EVLT. Result: The remifentanil group showed significantly less pain intensity during EVLT (p<0.01), but there were no differences of pain intensity between the two groups from the first week to the fourth week after EVLT (p>0.3). Conclusion: The result showed that the intravenous infusion of remifentanil during EVLT can be a good option to reduce pain during EVLT for treating varicose veins.

배경: 본 연구에서는 하지정맥류 정맥내 레이저 치료 시 통증 경감을 위해 사용하는 국소적 리도카인의 효과와 정맥주업용 레미펜타닐의 효과를 비교하였다. 대상 및 방법: 리도카인 군 (n=15)과 레미펜타닐 군 (n=15)간에 진통 효과의 유용성을 비교하기 위하여 통증의 강도를 visual analogue scale을 사용하여 수술 중과 수술 후 1주에서 4주까지 1주 간격으로 측정하여 비교하였다. 결과: 수술 중에는 레미펜타닐을 사용한 군에서 리도카인 군에 비해 유의한 수준의 통증 경감이 있었으며(p<0.01), 수술 후 1주에서 4주 사이에는 양군이 통증의 차이를 보이지 않았다(p>0.3). 결론: 이상의 결과는 하지 정맥류 레이저 치료 시 통증 경감을 위해 레미펜타닐의 정맥 주입이 좋은 방법이 될 수 있음을 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Munavalli GS, Weiss RA. Advances in techniques for endovenous ablation of truncal veins. Skin Therapy Lett 2006; 11:4-7
  2. Van den Bussche D, Moreels N, De Letter J, Lanckneus M. Endovenous laser treatment for primary varicose veins. Acta Chir Belg 2006;106:32-35 https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2006.11679828
  3. Kim KI, Lee WY, Jo TJ, Lee JW, Hong KW. Endovenous 980-nm diode laser treatment of incompetent great saphenous vein. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;40:97-102
  4. Lee SY, Song IH, Lee SJ, Park HJ, Lee CS, Lee KR. Short- term result of endovenous 980-nm diode laser treatment in varicose vein of lower extremities. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2005;38:557-563
  5. Myers K, Fris R, Jolley D. Treatment of varicose veins by endovenous laser therapy: assessment of results by ultrasound surveillance. Med J Aust 2006;185:199-202
  6. Kavuturu SH, Girishkumar H, Ehrlich F. Endovenous laser ablation of saphenous vein is an effective treatment modality for lower extremity varicose veins. Am Surg 2006;72:672-675
  7. Sharif MA, Soong CV, Lau LL, Corvan R, Lee B, Hannon RJ. Endovenous laser treatment for long saphenous vein incompetence. Br J Surg 2006;93:831-835 https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5351
  8. Kim HS, Nwankwo IJ, Hong K, McElgunn PS. Lower energy endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with 980 nm diode laser in continuous mode. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006;29:64-69 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0317-9
  9. McGregor RR, Allan LG, Sharpe, RM, Thornton C, Newton DE. Effect of remifentanil on the auditory evoked response and haemodynamic changes after intubation and surgical incision. Br J Anaesth 1998;61:785-786
  10. Milne SE, Kenny GN, Schraag S. Propofol sparing effect of remifentanil using closed-loop anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 2003;90:623-629 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeg115
  11. Wilhelm W, Grundmann U, Van Aken H, Haus EM, Larsen R. A multicenter comparison of isoflurane and propofol as adjuncts to remifentanil-based anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 2000;12:129-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0952-8180(00)00125-2
  12. Weale NK, Rogers CA, Cooper R, Nolan J, Wolf AR. Effect of remifentanil infusion rate on stress response to the pre-bypass phase of pediatric cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92:187-194 https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aeh038
  13. Hoke JF, Cunningham F, James MK, Muir KT, Hoffman WE. Comparative pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil, its principle metabolite (GR920291) and alfentanil in dogs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1997;281:226-232
  14. Chung F, Mulier JP, Scholz J, et al. A comparison of anaesthesia using remifentanil combined with either isoflurane, enflurane or propofol in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopy, varicose vein or arthroscopic surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2000;44:790-798 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440704.x
  15. Chanrachakul B, Likittanasombut P, Prasertsawat P, Herabutya Y. Lidocaine versus plain saline for pain relief in fractional curettage: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:592-595 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01529-0
  16. Cheing GL, Luk ML. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for neuropathic pain. J Hand Surg 2000;30:50-55
  17. Akyrou D, Plati C, Baltopoulos G, Anthopoulos L. Pain assessment in acute myocardial infarction patients. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 1995;11:252-255 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-3397(95)81693-3
  18. Lee SY, Park HJ, Lee CS, Lee KR. Transilluminated powered phlebectomy using arthroscopic equipment in varicose vein of lower extremities. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003;36:391-396
  19. Akcaboy ZN, Akcaboy EY, Albayrak D, Altinoren B, Dikmen B, Gogus N. Can remifentanil be a better choice than propofol for colonoscopy during monitored anesthesia care? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50:736-741 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.01047.x
  20. Rohm KD, Riechmann J, Boldt J, Suttner SW, Piper SN. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and remifentanil is associated with a nearly twofold higher incidence in postanesthetic shivering than desflurane-fentanyl anesthesia. Med Sci Monit 2006;12:CR452-CR456