DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

UAV Formation Wight Control Law Utilizing Energy Maneuverability

  • Choi, Jong-Ug (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, You-Dan (School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Seoul National University) ;
  • Moon, Gwan-Young (Agency for Defense Development)
  • Published : 2008.05.10

Abstract

This paper deals with the energy saving problem of the follower aircraft in the loose leader-follower formation geometry in which the lateral separation between formation members is more than a wingspan of the leader aircraft. This formation geometry offers no drag benefit, but has a strategic advantage. In the case of loose formation flight, the follower aircraft usually consumes more energy than the leader aircraft because the follower aircraft should use more thrust to maintain given formation geometry, especially during the turning phase from the outside of the leader"s flight path or join-up phase. A formation control scheme based on the energy maneuverability is proposed in this paper. To design the proposed control law, the velocity command is designed using feedback linearization for the horizontal formation geometry and then coverts it to the altitude command using the energy equation. Numerical simulation is performed to verify the effectiveness of the proposed controller.

Keywords

References

  1. Hummel, D., 'The Use of Aircraft Wakes to Achieve Power Reductions in Formation Flight', The Characterisation & Modification of Wakes from Lifting Vehicles in Fluids, AGARD Conference Proceedings 584, The Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 1996, pp. 36.1-36.13
  2. Wagner, G., Jacqeus, D., Blake, W., and Pachter, M., ' Flight Test Results of Close Formation Flight For Fuel Savings', AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Monterey, CA, USA, August 2002
  3. Wagner, G., Jacqeus, D., Blake, W., and Pachter, M., ' An Analytical Study of Drag Reduction in Tight Formation Flight', AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference and Exhibit, Montreal, Qebec, Canada, August 2001
  4. Pachter, M., D'Azzo, J. J., and Proud, A. W., 'Tight Formation Flight Control', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics,Vol. 24, No. 2, 2001, pp. 246-254 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4735
  5. Chichka, D. F., Speyer, J. L., Fanti, D., and Park, C. G., 'Peak-Seeking Control for Drag Reduction in Formation Flight', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 29, No. 5, 2006, pp. 1221-1230 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.15424
  6. Boskovic, J. D., Li, S. M., and Mehra, R. K., 'Semi-Globally Stable Formation Flight Control Design in Three Dimensions', Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, Orlando, FL, USA, December 2001
  7. Raymer, D. P., Aircraft Design : A Conceptual Approach, AIAA, Washington, DC, 1989, chaps.3,17,appendix A.4-2
  8. Segal, S., Ben-Asher, J. Z., and Weiss, H., 'Derivation of Formation - Flight Guidance Laws for Unmanned Air Vehicles', Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 4, 2005, pp. 733-742 https://doi.org/10.2514/1.7420