DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Levodopa Transport through Skin using Iontophoresis: the Role of Electroosmosis and Electrorepulsion

이온토포레시스를 이용한 levodopa의 경피전달: electroosmosis 및 electrorepulsion의 역할

  • 정신애 (숙명여자대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 곽혜선 (이화여자대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 전인구 (동덕여자대학교 약학대학) ;
  • 오승열 (숙명여자대학교 약학대학)
  • Published : 2008.02.21

Abstract

The objective of this work is to study transdermal delivery of levodopa using iontophoresis and evaluate various factors which affect the transdermal transport. Levodopa is unstable in aqueous solution, and, in order to establish a stable condition for levodopa for the duration of experiment, we investigated the stability of levodopa in aqueous solutions of different pHs with/without the addition of dextrose or the application of current. Using stable aqueous solution, we have studied the effect of pH, polarity and penetration enhancer (ethanol) on transdermal flux and compared the results. We also investigated the iontophoretic flux from hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) hydrogel. In vitro flux study was performed at $33^{\circ}C$, using side-by-side diffusion cell. Full thickness hairless mouse skin and rat skin were used for this work. Current densities applied were 0.4 or $0.6mA/cm^2$ and current was off after 6 hour application. Stability study showed that levodopa solution with a pH 2.5 or 4.5 maintained the initial concentration of levodopa for 24 hours with the addition of 5% dextrose. However, at pH 9.5, levodopa was unstable and 30 to 40% of levodopa degraded within 24 hours, even with the addition of 5% dextrose. Hydrogel swollen with dextrose added levodopa solution maintained about 97% of the initial concentration of levodopa for 13 days, when stored in $4^{\circ}C$. The application of current did not affect the stability of levodopa in hydrogel. Flux study from levodopa solution with pH 2.5 showed that cathodal delivery of levodopa was higher than passive or anodal delivery. When the pH of the donor solution was 4.5, anodal delivery of levodopa was higher than passive or cathodal delivery. These results seem to indicate that electroosmosis plays more dominant role than electrorepulsion in the flux of levodopa at pH 2.5, and the reverse situation applies for pH 4.5. The passive flux was unexpectedly high for the ionized levodopa. Similar to the results from aqueous solution, cumulative amount of levodopa transported trom HPC hydrogel by cathodal delivery was significantly higher than passive or anodal delivery. The treatment of 70% ethanol cotton ball by scrubbing increased passive, anodal and cathodal flux, with the largest increase for anodal flux. These results indicate that iontophoretic delivery of zwitterion such as levodopa is much complicated than that can be expected from small ionic molecules with single charge. The results also indicate that the balance between electroosmosis and electrorepulsion plays a very important role in the transport through skin.

Keywords

References

  1. I. Shoulson, G.A. Glaubiger and T.N. Chase, On-off response. Clinical and biochemical correlations during oral and intravenous levodopa administration in pakinsonian patients, Neurology, 25, 1144-1148 (1975) https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.25.12.1144
  2. J.G. Hardman, L.E. Limbird, P.D. Molinoff, R.W. Ruddon and A.G. Gilman, Goodman and Gilman's: the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 9th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, U.S.A., pp. 506-513, 1562, 1754 (1996)
  3. M.A. Mena, V. Muradas, E. Bezan, J. Reiriz and J.G. de Yebenes, Pharmacokinetics of L-DOPA in patients with Parkinson's disease. Adv. Neurol., 45, 481-486 (1987).1996)
  4. C.W. Olanow and W.C. Koller, An algorithm (decision tree) for the management of Parkinson's disease: treatment guidelines, Neurology, 50(Suppl. 3), pp. S1-S57 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.50.1.1
  5. J.L. Juncos, Levodopa: pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Neurol. Clin., 10(2), 487-509 (1992)
  6. H.D. Kao, A. Traboulsi, S. Itoh and A. Hussain, Enhancement of the systemic and CNS specific delivery of L-dopa by nasal administration of its water soluble prodrugs, Pharm. Res., 17, 978-984 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007583422634
  7. R.C. Scott, R.H. Guy and J. Hadgraft, Prediction of percutaneous penetration: Methods, Measurements and Modelling, IBC technical Services, London, UK, pp. 19-33 (1990)
  8. G.L. Flynn, R.L. Bronaugh and H.I. Mailbach, Percutaneous absortion, Marcel Dekker, New York, U.S.A., pp. 27-51 (1989)
  9. J. Jankovic and M. Stacy, Medical Management of Levodopa-Associated Motor Complications in Patients with Parkinson's Disease, CNS drugs, 21(8), 677-692 (2007) https://doi.org/10.2165/00023210-200721080-00005
  10. Y.N. Kalia, A. Naik, J. Garrison and R.H. Guy, Iontophoretic drug delivery, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 56, 619-658 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2003.10.026
  11. J.Y. Fang, K.C. Sung, H.H. Lin and C.L. Fang, Transdermal iontophoretic delivery of diclofenac sodium from various polymer formulations: in vitro and in vivo studies, Int. J. Pharm., 178, 83-92 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(98)00361-5
  12. B. Langer, New methods of drug delivery, Science, 249, 1527-1533 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2218494
  13. A.M. Mathur, S.K. Moorjani and A.B. Scranton, Methods for synthesis of hydrogel networks: a review, Macromol. Chem. Physics, C36(2), 405-430 (1996)
  14. M.D. Blanco, O. Garcia, R. Olmo, J.M. Teijon and I. Katime, Release of 5-fluorouracil from poly (acrylamide-comonopropyl itaconate) hydrogels, J. Chrom. B, 680, 243-253 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4347(95)00401-7
  15. T. Kankkunen, I. Huuponen, K. Lahtinen, M. Sundell, K. Ekman, K. Kontturi and J. Hirvonen, Improved stability and release control of levodopa and metaraminol using ionexchange fibers and transdermal iontophoresis, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 16(4-5), 273-80 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(02)00113-6
  16. D.J. Stennett, J.M. Christensen, J.L. Anderson and K.A. Parrott, Stability of levodopa in 5% dextrose injection at pH 5 or 6, Am. J. Hospital Pharm., 43(7), 1726-1728 (1986)
  17. J.E. Riviere and M.C. Heit, Electrically-assisted transdermal drug delivery, Pharm. Res., 14(6), 687-761 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012129801406
  18. V. Merino, A. Lopez, Y.N. Kalia and R.H. Guy, Electrorepulsion versus electroosmosis : effect of pH on the iontophoresis flux of 5-fluorouracil, Pharm. Res., 16(5), 758-761 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018841111922
  19. J.P. Hsu and B.T. Liu, Transport of ions through elliptic ionselective membrane, J. Memb. Sci., 142(2), 245-255 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-7388(97)00335-9
  20. M.J. Pikal and S. Shah, Transport mechanisms in iontophoresis. III. An experimental the contributions of electroosmotic flow and permeablity change in transport of low high molecular weight solutes, Pharm. Res., 7, 222-229 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015809725688
  21. R.H. Guy, Y.N. Kalia, M.B. Delgado-Charro, V. Merino, A. Lopez and D. Marro, Electrorepulsion and electroosmosis, J. Control. Rel., 64, 129-132 (1995)
  22. B.D. Bath, H.S. White and E.R. Scott, Visualization and analysis of electroosmotic in hairless mouse skin, Pharm. Res., 17, 471-475 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007589306661
  23. D. Marro, R.H. Guy and M.B. Delgado-Charro, Characterization of the iontophoretic properties of human and pig skin, J. Control. Rel., 70, 213-217 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(00)00350-3
  24. R.C. Scott, M. Walker and P.H. Dugard, A comparison of the in vitro permeability properties of human and some laboratory animal skins, Int. J. Cosmetic Sci., 8(4), 189-194 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2494.1986.tb00446.x
  25. M.J. Bartek, J.A. Labudde and H.I. Maibach, Skin permeability in vivo: comparison in rat, rabbit, pig and man, J. Inv. Dermatol., 58, 114-123 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12538909
  26. R.V. Kulkarni, D. Hiremath and P. Sagar, Skin deep: terpenes can enhance drug permeation, Pharmaceutical formulation & quality, Oct./Nov., Carpe Diem-A Wiley Co., Hoboken, New Jersy, U.S.A. (2007)
  27. S. K. Rastogi and J. Singh, Lipid extraction and transport of hydrophilic solutes through porcine epidermis, Int. J. Pharm., 225, 75-82 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(01)00766-9
  28. E. Manabe, K. Sugibayashi and Y. Morimoto, Analysis of skin penetration enhancing effect of drugs by ethanol-water mixed systems with hydrodynamic pore theory, Int. J. Pharm., 129, 211-221 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(95)04328-4