Journal of Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회논문집)

Korea Water Resources Association (한국수자원학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of an Inundation Risk Evaluation Method Based on a Multi Criteria Decision Making

다기준 의사결정기법을 기반으로 하는 침수위험 평가기법의 개발

  • Published : 2008.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, PROMETHEE(Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations) which is one of the multi criteria decision making methods is applied to estimate the relative inundation risk of the urban subcatchment. For this purpose, several factors which have an effect on the inundation risk are selected and used to perform PROMETHEE. Those are elevation average, slope average, density of conduit, population and sediment yields per unit area of each subcatchment. Based on them, PROMETHEE is performed and the relative inundation risk for each subcatchment is estimated. For the validation of the suggested method, the results from the suggested method are compared with the historical inundation records occured on 1998 and the relative inundation risk estimated by the method considering sediment yields per unit area only. From the comparison, it is found that the suggested method may generate better results to estimate the relative inundation risk of each subcatchment than the method considering sediment yields per unit area only. Also, it can be applied to establish a rehabilitation order of subcatchments for mitigating the inundation risk.

본 논문에서는 다기준 의사결정 방법의 하나인 PROMETHEE(Preference Ranking Organization METHod for Enrichment Evaluations)를 적용하여 도시유역내 소유역간의 상대적 침수위험도를 산정하였다. 이를 위해 도시유역의 침수에 영향을 미치는 인자를 선정하여 이를 PROMETHEE 적용을 위한 평가기준으로 활용하였다. 침수발생에 영향을 미치는 인자로는 유역의 평균고도, 평균경사, 관밀도, 인구수, 단위면적당 유사발생량으로 선정하였다. 선정된 인자를 바탕으로 PROMETHEE를 적용하여 산정된 소유역간 상대적 침수위험도를 '98년 침수실적 결과와 유사발생에 따른 상대적 침수위험도와 비교 분석하였다. 유사발생량만을 근거로 한 침수위험도에 비해 다양한 인자를 고려하여 산정된 소유역간 침수위험도가 '98년 침수실적 결과와 더 일치하는 것으로 나타났다. 본 논문에서 적용된 PROMETHEE에 의한 평가방법은 침수 예상지역의 사전 예방을 위한 정비 사업 계획 추진에 있어서 우선순위에 대한 방향을 결정하는데 있어서 기초자료가 될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. 경기개발연구원 (2006). 다기준의사결정모형(MCDM)을 이용한 경기도 주택정책의 효율적 운영방안 연구. 국가수자원관리종합정보시스템(www.wamis.go.kr/)
  2. 김중훈, 이재수, 박무종, 이상렬 (2004). 도시 내배수시설의 운영 및 유지관리 기술. 도시홍수재해관리기술연구사업단, FFC-04-15
  3. 민재형, 송영민 (2003). "PROMETHEE를 이용한 다기준의사결정." 서강경영논총, 서강대학교 경영학연구원, 제14권, 제2호, pp.109-127
  4. 박무종, 전환돈, 신민철 (2007). "GIS를 이용한 도시유역의 유사량 산정 및 유사발생과 침수위험도 관계분석." 대한토목학회 논문집, 대한토목학회, 제27권,제3B호, pp. 277-287
  5. 이재응, 남동성 (2007). "다기준의사결정기법을 이용한 안동다목적댐의 수문학적 안정성 증대방안 결정." 국토연구, 국토연구원, Vol. 53, pp. 93-109
  6. 홍성준, 이용대, 김승권, 김중훈 (2006). "PROMETHEE와 ANP기법을 활용한 상수도관망의 위험요소평가." 산업공학, 대한산업공학회, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 106-116
  7. 황유정 (2006). "홍수에 의한 침수 취약지역 예측에 관한 연구." 한국지역지리학회지, 한국지역지리학회, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 172-178
  8. Brans, J.P. and Vincke, Ph. (1985). "A preference ranking organisation method." Management Science, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 647-656 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647
  9. Chou, W.C., Lin, W.T. and Lin, C.Y. (2007). "Application of fuzzy theory and PROMETHEE technique to evaluate suitable ecotechnology method: A case study in Shihmen Reservoir Watershed, aiwan." Ecological Engineering, Vol.31, pp. 269-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.08.004
  10. Keeney, R. L. and Raiffa, H. (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objective: Preferences and Value Tradeoff. John Wiley & Sons, New York https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.08.004
  11. Mladineo, N., Lozi, I., Stoi, S. Mlinari, D. and Radica, T. (1992). "An evaluation of multicriteriaanalysis for DSS in public policy decision." European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 61, pp. 219-229 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(92)90283-F
  12. Mladineo, N., Margeta, J., Brans, J.P., and Mareschal, B. (1987). "Multicriteria ranking of alternative locations for small scale hydro plants." European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 31, pp. 215-222 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90025-7
  13. Roy, B. (1991). "The Outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods" Theory and Decision, Vol. 31, pp. 49-73 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
  14. Roy, B. and Vanderpooten, D. (1996). "The European School of MCDA : Emergence, Basic Features and Current Works." Jurnal of Mutil-criteria Decision Analysis, Vol 5, pp.22-38 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00134132
  15. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning Setting Priorities, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199603)5:1<22::AID-MCDA93>3.0.CO;2-F
  16. Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback: the Analytic Network Process. RWS publisher, Pittsburgh
  17. Simos, J. (1990). L`evaluation environnementale : unproces sur cognitif negocie, These de doctorat, DGR-EPFL, Lausanne, p. 216
  18. Steuer, R.E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. John Wiley & Sons
  19. Steuer, R.E. (1986). Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation, and Application. John Wiley & Sons

Cited by

  1. A Study on the Assessment Method for High-risk Urban Inundation Area Using Flood Vulnerability Index vol.12, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2012.12.2.245
  2. Comparative Studies of MCDM for Vulnerability Analysis in Gamcheon Basin vol.15, pp.5, 2015, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2015.15.5.215
  3. A Study on Urban Flood Vulnerability Assessment vol.13, pp.5, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.5.297
  4. Evaluation of Inland Inundation Risk in Urban Area using Fuzzy AHP vol.47, pp.9, 2014, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2014.47.9.789
  5. Evaluation Method of Urban Inundation Risk using Multi Criteria Decision Making Method vol.12, pp.2, 2012, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2012.12.2.209
  6. UI proposal using modified diamond pairwise comparison diagram for fuzzy integral-based GIS–MCDM vol.24, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-016-0031-0
  7. Assessment of Inundation Risk Degree for Urban Areas vol.13, pp.1, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.1.129
  8. Identification of Flood Risk Areas using a Multi-criteria Decision Making Method vol.13, pp.2, 2013, https://doi.org/10.9798/KOSHAM.2013.13.2.237