DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Growth and Photosynthetic Responses of One C3 and Two C4 Chenopodiaceae Plants to Three CO2 Concentration Conditions

  • Published : 2008.11.30

Abstract

Growth and photosynthetic responses of one $C_3$ and two $C_4$ plants in the family Chenopodiaceae in three $CO_2$ concentration $([CO_2])$ conditions-low (about $243{\mu}mol\;mol^{-1}$, LC), present (about 378, PC), and high (about 465, HC)-were investigated in open top chambers. The relative growth rate (RGR) and net assimilation rate in the $C_3$ plant, Chenopodium album, increased with increasing $[CO_2]$, though the RGR was not enhanced significantly in the HC condition. The leaf area ratio and leaf weight ratio of the $C_3$ plant drastically decreased with increasing $[CO_2]$, suggesting that the $C_3$ plant invests more biomass to leaves in lower $[CO_2]$ conditions. The two $C_4$ plants, Atriplex glauca and A. lentiformis, showed relatively small changes in those growth parameters. These photosynthetic-pathway-dependent responses suggest that growth patterns of $C_3$ and $C_4$ plants have been altered by past increases in atmospheric $[CO_2]$ but that there will be relatively little further alteration in the future high-$CO_2$ world.

Keywords

References

  1. Acock B, Allen LH Jr. 1985. Crop responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. In: Direct Effect of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation (Strain BR, Cure JD, eds). US Department of Energy, Washington, pp 53-98
  2. Amthor JS. 1991. Respiration in a future, high $CO_{2}$ world. Plant Cell Environ 14: 13-20 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1991.tb01367.x
  3. Barnola JM, Raynaud D, Korotkevich YS, Lorius C. 1987. Vostoc ice core provides 160,000-year record of atmospheric $CO_{2}$. Nature 329: 408-414 https://doi.org/10.1038/329408a0
  4. Bazzaz FA, Garbutt K, Williams WE. 1985. Effect of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration on plant communities. Direct effect of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation. In: Direct Effect of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation (Strain BR, Cure JD, eds). US Department of Energy, Washington, pp 155-170
  5. Bazzaz FA. 1990. The response of natural ecosystem to the rising global $CO_{2}$ levels. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 21: 167-196
  6. Callaway RM, DeLucia EH, Thomas EM. 1994. Compensatory response of $CO_{2}$ exchange and biomass allocation and their effects on the relative growth rate of ponderosa pine in different $CO_{2}$ and temperature regimes. Oecologia 98: 159-166 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00341468
  7. Ceulemans R, Mousseau M. 1994. Effects of elevated atmospheric $CO_{2}$ on woody plants. New Phytol 127: 425-446 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb03961.x
  8. Cowling SA, Sage RF. 1998. Interactive effects of low atmospheric $CO_{2}$ and elevated temperature on growth, photosynthesis and respiration in Phaseolus vulgaris. Plant Cell Environ 21: 427-435 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00290.x
  9. Cure JD. 1985. Carbon dioxide doubling responses: a crop survey. Direct effect of increasing carbon dioxide on vegetation. In: Direct Effect of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation (Strain BR, Cure JD, eds). US Department of Energy, Washington, pp 99-116
  10. Delmas RJ, Ascencio J-M, Lgrand M. 1980. Polar ice evidence that atmospheric $CO_{2}$ 20,000 yr BP was 50% of present. Nature 284: 155-157 https://doi.org/10.1038/284155a0
  11. Dippery JK, Tissue DT, Thomas RB, Strain BR. 1995. Effect of low and elevated $CO_{2}$ on $C_{3}$ and C4 annuals. I. Growth and biomass allocation. Oecologia 101: 13-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328894
  12. Drake BG, Azcon-Bieto J, Berry J, Bunce J, Dukstra P, Farrar J, Gifford RM, Gonzalez-Meler MA, Koch G, Lambers H, Siedow J, Wullschleger S. 1999. Does elevated $CO_{2}$ concentration inhibit mitochondrial respiration in green plants? Plant Cell Environ 22: 649-657 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00438.x
  13. Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Dearing MD. 2005. A History of Atmospheric $CO_{2}$ and Its Effects on Plants, Animals, and Ecosystem. Springer, New York
  14. Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE, Helliker BR. 1997. $C_4$ photosynthesis, atmospheric $CO_{2}$, and climate. Oecologia 112: 285-299 https://doi.org/10.1007/s004420050311
  15. Ehleringer JR, Sage RF, Flanagan LB, Pearcy RW. 1991. Climate change and the evolution of $C_4$ photosynthesis. Trends Ecol Evol 6: 95-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(91)90183-X
  16. Farnsworth EJ, Ellison AM, Gpng WK. 1994. Elevated $CO_{2}$ alters anatomy, physiology, growth, and reproduction of red mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.). Oecologia 108: 599-609 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329032
  17. Harper JL. 1977. Population Biology of Plants. Academic Press Inc., San Diego
  18. IPCC WG I. 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing. In: Climate Change 2007 The Physical Science Basis (Solomon S, Quin D, Mannig M, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor MMB, Miller HL Jr., Chen Z, eds). Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 128-234
  19. Iwaki H. 1958. The influence of density on the dry matter production of Fagopyrum esculentum. Jpn J Bot 16: 210-226
  20. Koike T, Lei TT, Maximov TC, Tabuchi R, Takahashi K, Ivanov BI. 1996. Comparison of the photosynthetic capacity of Siberian and Japanese birch grown in elevated $CO_{2}$ and temperature. Tree Physiol 16: 381-385 https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/16.3.381
  21. Neftel A, Moor E, Oeschger H, Stauffer B. 1985. Evidence from polar ice core for the increase in atmospheric $CO_{2}$ in the past two centuries. Nature 315: 45-47 https://doi.org/10.1038/315045a0
  22. Oechel W, Strain BR. 1985. Native species responses to increased carbon dioxide concentrations. In: Direct Effect of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation (Strain BR, Cure JD, eds). US Department of Energy, Washington, pp 117-154
  23. Overdieck D. 1989. The effects of preindustrial and predicted future atmospheric $CO_{2}$ concentrations on Lyonia mariana L. D. Don. Func Ecol 3: 569-576 https://doi.org/10.2307/2389571
  24. Polley HW, Johnson HB, Marino BD, Mayeux HS. 1993. Increase in $C_3$ plant water-use efficiency and biomass over glacial to present $CO_{2}$ concentrations. Nature 361: 61-64 https://doi.org/10.1038/361061a0
  25. Polley HW, Johnson HB, Mayeux HS. 1992. Growth and gas exchange of oats (Avena sativa) and wild mustard (Brassica kaber) at subambient $CO_{2}$ concentrations. Int J Plant Sci 153: 453-461 https://doi.org/10.1086/297051
  26. Pooerter H, Navas ML. 2003. Plant growth and competition at elevated $CO_{2}$; on winners, losers and functional groups. New Phytol 157: 175-198 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00680.x
  27. Poorter H, Roumet C, Campbell BD. 1996. Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to elevated $CO_{2}$: a search for functional types. In: Carbon Dioxide, Populations and Communities (Körner C, Bazzaz FA, eds). Academic Press, New York, pp 375-421
  28. Poorter H. 1993. Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated ambient $CO_{2}$ concentration. Vegetatio 104/105: 77-97 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048146
  29. Raschi A, Miglietta F, Tongetti R, van Gardingen PR. 1997. Plant Responses to Elevated [$CO_{2}$]-Evidence from Natural Springs. Cambridge University Press, New York
  30. Sage RF, Raid CD. 1992. Photosynthetic acclimation to sub-ambient $CO_{2}$ (20 Pa) in the $C_3$ annual Phaseolus vulgaris L. Photosynthetica 27: 605-617
  31. Tissue DT, Griffin KL, Thomas RB, Strain BR. 1995. Effects of low and elevated $CO_{2}$ on $C_3$and $C_4$ annuals. II. Photosynthesis and leaf biochemistry. Oecologia 101: 21-28 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00328895
  32. Tremmel DC, Bazzaz FA. 1993. How neighbor canopy architecture affects target plant performance. Ecology 74: 2114-2124 https://doi.org/10.2307/1940856
  33. Tremmel DC, Bazzaz FA. 1995. Plant architecture and allocation in different neighborhoods: Implications for competitive success. Ecology 76: 262-271 https://doi.org/10.2307/1940647
  34. Wand SJE, Midgley GF, Jhones MH, Curtis PS. 1999. Responses of wild $C_3$ and $C_4$ grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric $CO_{2}$ concentration: a meta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Global Change Biol 5: 723-741 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00265.x
  35. Ward JK, Strain BR. 1997. Effect of low and elevated $CO_{2}$ artial pressure on growth and reproduction of Arabidopsis thaliana from different elevations. Plant Cell Environ 20: 254-260 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1997.d01-59.x