Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers (한국농공학회논문집)

The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers (한국농공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Scenario-Based Exposure Risk Assessment of Molinate in a Paddy Plot ; (2) Exposure Risk Assessment

시나리오별 논에서의 molinate 노출위험도 분석: (2) 노출위험도 평가

  • Published : 2008.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Exposure risk assessment of pesticide molinate using the RICEWQ model in a rice paddy plot was performed to observe the effects of various water and pesticide management scenarios. Several scenarios were developed to represent the specific water and pesticide management practices of rice cultivation in Korea. The results of the scenario analysis using the RICEWQ model simulation from the previous studies were analysed. The molinate risk for aquatic organisms is evaluated by the ratio of the predicted environmental concentration(PEC) and the predicted no-effect concentration(PNEC). The results showed that the no-effect periods for aquatic organisms for the deep, shallow and very shallow irrigation conditions were 33.3, 28.9 and 25.6 DATs for the lable rate application and 36.4, 33.7 and 30.8 DATs for the double lable rate application, respectively. The higher application rate showed greater exposure risk to the aquatic organisms. Based on this study, the withholding period of molinate practiced in Korea, that is 3 to 4 DATs, must be much longer. The results of this study can be used for the non-point source pollution control and environmental policy making regarding pesticides.

Keywords

References

  1. Chung, S.O., K.J. Park & S.H. Son, 2008a, Calibration and Sensitivity analysis of the RICEWQ model, Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 50(2), pp.3-10 https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2008.50.2.003
  2. Chung, S.O., K.J. Park & S.H. Son, 2008b, Scenario-Based Exposure Risk Assessment of Molinate in a Paddy Plot : (1) Analysis of simulation results, Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 50(2), pp.11-16 https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2008.50.2.011
  3. Deuel, L.E., J.D. Price, F. Turner & K.W. Brown, 1979, Persistence of Carbofuran and Its Metabolities, 3-keto and 3-hydroxy carbofuran, underflooded rice culture, Journal of Environmental Quality, 8(1), pp.23-26 https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq1979.00472425000800010006x
  4. European Food Safety Authority(EFSA), 2006, Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant health, Plant Protection Products and Their Residues on a Request from the EFSA Related to the Aquatic Risk Assessment for Cyprodinil and the Use of a Mesocosm Study in Particular, The EFSA Journal, 329, pp.1-77
  5. Hamilton, D.J., A. Ambrus, R.M. Dieterle, A.S. Felsot, C.A. Harris, P.T. Holland, A. Katayama, N. Kurihara, J. Linders, J. Unswarth & S.-S. Wong, 2003, Regulatory Limits for Pesticide Residues in Water, Pure and Applied Chemistry, 75(8), pp.123-1155
  6. Kegley, S., 2003, Molinate on Rice, Pesticide Action Network North America, Accessed on April 11, 2008, http://www.panna.org/ resources/gpc/gpc_200312.13.3.03.dv.html
  7. Korea Crop Protection Association(KCPA), 2005a, Pesticide Year Book, 745p. (In Korean)
  8. Korea Crop Protection Association(KCPA), 2005b, Instruction manual for pesticide application, 1015p. (In Korean)
  9. Ministry of Environment (MOE), Republic of Korea, 2003, Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) Research Plane 2003, 35p.(in Korean)
  10. Newhart, K.L., 2002, Rice Pesticide Use and Surface Water Monitoring 2002, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Report #EH02-09, 36p
  11. NSW Environment Protection Authority, 2004, Environment Protection Licence No. 4651, NSW, Australia
  12. PAN Pesticide Database, Accessed on January 17, 2006, at http://www.pesticideinfo.org/ Index.html
  13. Park, B.J., 2003, Studies on the Fate of Herbicide, Molinate in Paddy Rice Ecosystem, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Agricultural Chemistry, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Korea. (in Korean)
  14. Park, K.J., 2007, Scenario-based simulation for molinate concentrations in rice paddies using RICEWQ model, Ph.D. Thesis, Dept. of Agricultural Engineering, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea
  15. Ryu, G.H., 2002, Present status and future perspectives of the pesticide safety manage ment in Korea, Proceedings of the 27th Korean Public Health Association Conference, p.11
  16. Spencer, W.F., M.M. Cliath, J.W. Blair & R.A. LeMert, 1985, Transport of Pesticides from Irrigated Fields in Surface Runoff and Tile Drain Waters, US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Report 31, Washington, DC, USA, 76p
  17. Stephenson, D.R., I.G. Ferris, P.T. Holland & M. Nordberg, 2006, Glossary of Terms Relating to Pesticides(IUPAC Recommendations 2006), Pure and Applied Chemistry, 78(11), pp.2075-2154 https://doi.org/10.1351/pac200678112075
  18. Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission( TNRCC), 1996, Guidance for Conducting Ecological Risk Assessments Under the Texas Risk Reduction Program, Office of Waste Management, RG-263, Austin, Texas, USA
  19. The Council of the European Communities, 1991, Council Directive concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market (91/414/EEC), 194p
  20. U.S. EPA, 1992, Framework for Ecological Risk Assessment, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington DC, EPA/630/R-02/011
  21. U.S. EPA, 2003, Re-registration Eligibility Decision for Propanil, Office of Pesticide Programs, Special Review and Re-registration Decision
  22. van der Werf, H.M.G., 1996, Assessing the impact of pesticides on the environment, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 60, pp.81-96 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(96)01096-1