Evaluation of Granular Activated Carbon Process Focusing on Molar mass and size distribution of DOM

DOM의 분자량과 크기분포에 따른 입상활성탄 공정의 평가

  • 채선하 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원) ;
  • 이경혁 (한국수자원공사 수자원연구원)
  • Received : 2007.10.08
  • Accepted : 2008.01.04
  • Published : 2008.02.15

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the variation of the molecular size distribution by granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption. GAC adsorption was assessed by using the rapid small-scale column test (RSSCT) and high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (HPSEC) was used to analyze the molecular size distribution (MSD) in the effluent of GAC column. RSSCT study suggested that GAC adsorption exhibited excellent interrelationship between dissolved organic carbon (DOC) breakthrough and MSD as function of bed volumes passed. After GAC treatment, the nonadsorbable fraction which was about 25percents of influent DOC corresponded to the hydrophilic (HPI) natural organic carbon (NOM) of NOM fractions and was composed entirely of <300 molecular weight (MW) in the HPSEC at the initial stage of the RSSCT operation. The dominant MW fraction in the source water was 1,000~5,000daltons. At the bed volumes 2,500, MW <500 of GAC treated water was risen rather than it of source water. After the bed volumes 7,300 of operation, the MW 1,000~3,000 fraction was closed to about 80percents of DOC found in the GAC influent. The Number-average molecular weight (Mn) value determined using HPSEC for the effluent of GAC column was gently increased as DOC breakthrough progress. The quotient p(Mw/Mn) can be used to estimate the degree of polydispersity was shown greatest value for the GAC effluent at the initial stage of the RSSCT operation.

Keywords

References

  1. Karanfil T. K., Kilduff J. E., Schlautman M. A. and Weber W. J. (1996) Adsorption of organic macromolecules by granular activated carbon: 1. Influence of molecular properties under anoxic solution conditions, Environmental Science and Technology, 30(7), pp. 2187-2194 https://doi.org/10.1021/es9505863
  2. Karanfil T., Kitis M., Kilduff J. E. and Wigton A. (1999) Role of Granular Activated Carbon Surface Chemistry on the Adsorption of Organic Compounds, 2. Natural Organic Matter, Environmental Science and Technology, 33(18), pp. 3225-3233 https://doi.org/10.1021/es9810179
  3. Karanfil T. and Kilduff J. E. (1999) Role of Granular Activated Carbon Surface Chemistry on the Adsorption of Organic Compounds, 1. Priority pollutants, Environmental Science and Technology, 33(18), pp. 3217-3224 https://doi.org/10.1021/es981016g
  4. Kitis M. (2001) Probing Cholrine Reactivity of Dissolved Organic Matter for Disinfection by-products (DBP) Formation; Relations with Specific Ultraviolet Absorbance(SUVA) and Development of the DBP Reactivity Profile, Ph.D. Dissertation, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
  5. Kilduff J. E. and Wigton A. (1999) Sorption of TCE by Humic-preloaded Activated Carbon: Incorporating Sizeexclusion and Pore Blockage Phenomena in a Competitive Adsorption Model, Environmental Science and Technology, 33(2), pp. 250-256 https://doi.org/10.1021/es980321z
  6. Knappe D. R. U., Snoeyink V. L., Roche P., Prados M. J. and Bourbigot M. M. (1997) The Effect of Preloading on Rapid Small-scale Column Test Predictions of Atrazine Removal by GAC Adsorbers, Water research, 31(11), pp. 2899-2909 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00148-6
  7. Semmens, M.J., and Staples (1986) The Nature of Organics Removed During Treatment of Mississippi River Water, J. of AWWA, 78(2), pp. 76-81
  8. Sonthmeir H., Crittenden J. C. and Summers R. S. (1988) Activated Carbon for Water Treatment, second edition, DVGW-Forschungsstelle, Germany
  9. Summers R. S. and Roberts P. V. (1988) Activated carbon adsorption of humic substance, I. heterodisperse mixtures and desorption, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 122, pp. 367-381 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(88)90372-4
  10. Summers R. S., S. Hopper and S. Hong (1996) GAC Precursor Removal Studies, ICR Manual for Bench- and Pilot-Scale Treatment Studies. EPA 814-B-96-003, USEPA, Office of Water
  11. Thurman, E. M. and Malcomn, R. L. (1981) Preparative Isolation of Aquatic Humic Substance, Environmental Science and Technology, 15(4), pp. 463-466 https://doi.org/10.1021/es00086a012
  12. Weber W. J. Jr., Voice T. C., and Jodelah A. (1983) Adsorption of Humic Substances: The Effects of Heterogeneity and System Characteristics, J. of AWWA, 75(12), pp. 612-619 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1551-8833.1983.tb05246.x