DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The common orthopedic problems in parent's concern

부모의 관심이 많은 소아 정형외과 질환

  • Shin, Dong Eun (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bundang CHA Hospital, College of Medicine Pochon CHA University) ;
  • Yoon, Byung Ho (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bundang CHA Hospital, College of Medicine Pochon CHA University) ;
  • Chung, Ju Hwan (Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Bundang CHA Hospital, College of Medicine Pochon CHA University)
  • 신동은 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 윤병호 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 정형외과학교실) ;
  • 정주환 (포천중문의과대학 분당차병원 정형외과학교실)
  • Received : 2007.12.28
  • Accepted : 2008.01.16
  • Published : 2008.02.15

Abstract

Roughly one third of medical problems in children are related to the musculoskeletal system. Most of these problems are common and can be precisely diagnosed. For these problems, nonoperative treatment or reassurance can be given by the pediatrician. Occasionally, a problem needs surgical treatment, but a precise diagnosis must be made. There is little agreement about what types of orthopedic problems a primary care pediatrician should understand in order to effectively care for children. Many pediatric residencies lack an organized teaching curriculum that effectively covers these topics or that includes a required pediatric orthopedic rotation. In this article the authors delineate pediatric orthopedic problems that require recognition and urgent surgical treatment and are relatively common, but have different treatment options (observation, conservative treatment, and surgery) depending on their natural history. Whenever possible, the diagnosis should be made before a decision to refer is made. An accurate diagnosis allows the pediatrician to discuss the natural history of the condition properly. Referral to the wrong specialty can needlessly generate expensive tests and further delay in treatment or generate inappropriate treatment. The parents can be reassured rather than waiting to hear the same information from another physician. In particular, orthopedic problems are known to generate pressure from the parents to seek specialty consultation for reassurance. It is important to communicate to the specialist that the reason for the referral is for parental reassurance rather than for further work-up or treatment. After a proper diagnosis, communication directly between the pediatrician and the appropriate specialist can often avoid an unnecessary referral, and avoid unnecessary tests. The authors reviewed our experience at our outpatient clinic over last 1 year and found that it is useful to classify conditions as common or uncommon, and whether they require surgical or nonsurgical treatment. Many conditions fall in between. The following is a discussion of some of these more important or common conditions.

Keywords

References

  1. Haueisen DC,k Weiner DS, Weiner SD. The characterization of "transient synovitis of the hip" in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1986;6:11 https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198601000-00003
  2. Spock A. Transient synovitis of the hip joint in children. Pediatrics 1959;24:1042
  3. Edwards E. Transient synovitis of hip joint in children. JAMA 1952;148:30 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1952.02930010032007
  4. Wedge JH, Munkacsi I, Loback D. Anteversion of the femur JBJS 1989;71A
  5. Staheli LT, Corbett M, Wyss C, H King. Lower-extremity rotational problems in children: normal values to guide management. J Bone Joint Surg 1985;67A:39
  6. Anderson M, Green WT, Messner MB. Growth and prediction of growth in the lower extremities. JBJS 1963;45A:10
  7. Ignacio, Ponseti, Becker. Congenital metarsus adductus: the results of treatment. J Bone Joint Surg 1966;48A:702
  8. Heinrich SD, Sharps C. Lower extremity torsional deformities in children. Orthop Trans 13:554
  9. Ilfeld FW, Westin GW, Making M. Developmental dislocation of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;203:276
  10. Coleman SS. Diagnosis of congenital dysplasia of the hip in infant. JAMA 1956;6:548
  11. Barlow TG. Early diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip. JBJS 1962;44B:292
  12. Zionts LE, MacEwen GD. Treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip in children between the ages of one and three years. J Bone Joint Surg 1968;68A:829
  13. Atlas S, Menacho LC, Ures S. Some new aspects in the pathology of clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;149:224
  14. Simons GW. A standardized method for radiographic evaluation of clubfoot. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1978;135:107-18
  15. McKay DW. New concept of and approach to club foot treatment. Section I. Principles and morbid anatomy. J Pediatr Orthop 1982;2:347 https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198210000-00001
  16. Bensahel H, Csukonyi Z, Desgrippes Y, Chaumien JP. Surgery in residual club foot. J Pediatr Orthop 1987;7:145 https://doi.org/10.1097/01241398-198703000-00005
  17. Price CT. Non-operative treatment of congenital club-foot. A long-term follow-up study. Orthop Trans 1978;2:213
  18. Thompson GH, Richardson AB, Westin GW. Surgical management of resistant congenital talipes equinovarus deformities. J Bone Joint Surg 1982;64A:652
  19. Jung MS, Baek GH, K HS. Congenital anomaly. Section I. Hand Surgery. KoonJa Pub, 2005
  20. Dillham JM, Meggitt BF. Trigger thumbs in children: A review of the natural history and indications for treatment in 105 patients