The Vascular System of the Angular Artery: Anatomical Study and Clinical Application

안각동맥의 해부학적 고찰과 임상적 적용

  • Woo, JongSeol (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Da-Arm (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Ha (Department of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-Woon (Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • 우종설 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김다앎 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 오상하 (충남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김동운 (충남대학교 의과대학 해부학교실)
  • Received : 2008.04.03
  • Accepted : 2008.05.22
  • Published : 2008.11.10

Abstract

Purpose: Although there are many ways to perform midface reconstruction, several difficulties exist for selecting the appropriate method, because of its anatomical and functional complexities, donor site morbidities, and poor aesthetic results. Various flaps based on the angular artery can overcome these limitations of the traditional reconstruction methods. The purpose of this study is to suggest an alternative reconstructive method for the midface using various flaps based on the angular artery. Methods: We investigated the relationship between the angular artery and its surrounding structures through cadaveric studies and then applied the findings clinically. As a result, we were able to perform reconstruction with a retroangular flap for defects of the lower half of the nose and the lower eyelid. In addition, defects of the upper half of the nose and the medial canthal area were reconstructed by using island composite glabellar flap. Results: The angular artery was reliable as a pedicle, whether it was used antegrade or retrograde. All the wounds were successfully closed, with the exception of minor complications such as partial skin necrosis and flap bulkiness. The aesthetic outcomes for the donor and recipient sites were satisfactory. Conclusion: The angular artery has diverse relationships with its surrounding structures according to its course of travel, and if a surgeon has a precise understanding of its anatomical location, we believe that retroangular flap and island composite glabellar flap may improve the treatment of midface defects.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 충남대학교

References

  1. Fabrizio T, Savani A, Sanna M, Biazzi M, Tunesi G: The retroangular flap for nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 97: 431, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199602000-00025
  2. Kang NH, Song SH, Lee SR, Oh SH, Seo YJ: Retroangular flap for midface reconstruction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 33: 531, 2006
  3. Tellioglu AT, Tekdemir I, Saray A, Eker E: Reconstruction of proximal nasal defects with island composite nasal flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 115: 416, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000149533.55827.B1
  4. Song SH, Kang NH, Lee SR, Oh SH, Seo YJ: Reconstruction of proximal nasal medial canthal defects with island composite glabellar flaps. J Korean Cleft Palate Craniofac Assoc 8: 55, 2007
  5. Whetzel TP, Mathes SJ: Arterial anatomy of the face: an analysis of vascular territories and perforating cutaneous vessels. Plast Reconstr Surg 89: 591, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199204000-00001
  6. Niranjan NS: An anatomical study of the facial artery. Ann Plast Surg 21: 14, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198807000-00003
  7. Kim SK: The nasolabial axial myocutaneous flap: a microdissection. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 23: 983, 1996
  8. Sasaki K, Nozaki M, Katahira J, Kikuchi Y: A nasolabial composite free flap with buccal mucosa: Reconstruction of full-thickness lower eyelid defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 102: 464, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199808000-00030
  9. Ullmann Y, Fodor L, Shoshani O, Rissin Y, Eldor L, Egozi D, Ramon Y: A novel approach to the use of the paramedian forehead flap for nasal reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 115: 1372, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.PRS.0000157204.12639.A8
  10. Hagan WE, Walker LB: The nasolabial musculocutaneous flap: clinical and anatomical correlations. Laryngoscope 98: 341, 1988
  11. Doermann A, Hauter D, Zook EG, Russell RC: V-Y advancement flaps for tumor excision defects of the eyelids. Ann Plast Surg 22: 429, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-198905000-00008
  12. Meadows AER, Manner RM: A simple modification of the glabellar flap in medial canthal reconstruction. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 19: 313, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IOP.0000075796.48708.4D
  13. Onishi K, Maruyama Y, Okada E, Oqino Al: Medial canthal reconstruction with glabellar combined Rintala flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 119: 537, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000246381.45284.a1