Formaldehyde and TVOC Emission of Bio-Composites with Attached Fancy Veneer

  • Lee, Byoung-Ho (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hee-Soo (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Wook (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Se-Na (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyun-Joong (Lab. of Adhesion & Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2008.02.13
  • Accepted : 2008.03.07
  • Published : 2008.03.25

Abstract

This study assesses the formaldehyde and TVOC emissions from bio-composites with attached fancy veneer manufactured using wood flour and polypropylene (PP) measured using the Field and Laboratory Emission Cell (FLEC) method and 20 L small chamber method. To determine and compare the effects of the adhesive, samples were prepared with different manufacturing methods. In the FLEC result, the formaldehyde emission level of the bio-composites with attached veneer by hot-press was the lowest than pure bio-composite and bio-composite attached veneer using adhesive. The TVOC emission levels are similar to the formaldehyde emission. The TVOC emission level is very low in all of the samples except fancy veneer that is attached with bio-composites using adhesive. The TVOC emission varies depending on how attaching fancy veneer. The results of the 20 L small chamber method were very similar to those obtained with the FLEC, but the correlation was not perfect. However, the FLEC method requires a shorter time than the 20 L small chamber method to measure the formaldehyde and TVOC emissions. The internal bonding strength exceeded the minimum value of $0.4N/mm^2$ specified by the KS standard. All of the bio-composites with attached veneer satisfied the KS standard.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Forest Service

References

  1. Arbelaiz A., B. Fernandez, J. A. Ramos, and I. Mondragon. 2005. Thermal and crystallization studies of short flax fibre reinforced polypropylene matrix composites: Effect of treatments. Thermochimica Acta 440: 111-121.
  2. ASTM-D6007-96. 1996. Standard test method for determining formaldehyde concentrations in air from wood products using a small scale chamber.
  3. CEC-Commission of the European Communities, prENV 13419-2. 1998. Building products-determination of the emission of volatile organic compounds-Part 2: Emission test cell method, Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
  4. Demir H., U. Atikler, D. balkose, and F. Tihminlioglu. 2006. The effect of fiber surface treatments on the tensile and water sorption properties of polypropylene-luffa fiber composites. Composites Part A 37: 447-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.05.036
  5. ECA-IAQ Report No.16. 1995. Determination of VOCs emitted from indoor materials and products - Second inter laboratory comparison of small chamber measurements, Brussels.
  6. ENV 13419-1. 1999. Building products-Determination of the emission of volatile organic compounds-Part 1: Emission test chamber method, Brussels, European Committee for Standardization.
  7. Gustaffson H. 1992. Building materials identified as major emission sources for indoor air pollutants-a critical review of case studies, Document D10 1992 ISBN 91-540-5471-0 Stockholm, Sweden: Swedish Council for Building Research
  8. ISO 16000-10, 2004. Indoor-Air Part 10: Determination of theemission of volatile organic compounds-Emission test cell method. International Organization for Standardization.
  9. Kavvouras P. K., D. Koniditsiotis, and J. Satola. 1998. Resistance of cured urea-formaldehyde resins to hydrolysis: a method of evaluation. Holzforschung 52: 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.1.105
  10. Kim H.-S., H.-S. Yang, H.-J. Kim, B.-J. Lee, and T.-S. Hwang. 2005. Thermal properties of agroflour- filled biodegradable polymer bio-composites. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry 81: 299-306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-0782-7
  11. Kim S. and H.-J. Kim. 2005. Comparison of formaldehyde emission from building finishing materials as temperature in under heating system; ONDOL. Indoor Air 15: 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0668.2005.00368.x
  12. Kim S., H.-J. Kim, and S.-J. Moon. 2006a. Evaluation of VOC emissions from building finishing materials using a small chamber and VOC analyser. Indoor and Built Environment 15: 511-523. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X06072040
  13. Kim S., J.-A Kim, H.-J. Kim, and S.-D. Kim. 2006b. Determination of formaldehyde and TVOC emission factor from wood-based composites by small chamber method. Polymer Testing 25: 605-614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2006.04.008
  14. Kim S., J.-A Kim, and H.-J. Kim. 2007. Application of Field and Laboratory Emission Cell (FLEC) to Determine Formaldehyde and VOCs Emissions from Wood-Based Composites. Mokchae Konghak 35: 24-37.
  15. Uchiyama, S., T. Akimoto, and S.-I. Tanabe. 2001. Emission rate measurement of chemical compounds emitted from the thermal insulating materials, International FLEC Symposium 2001. pp. 110-115.