유방암 환자에서 유방절제술과 절제 후 즉시 재건술에 의한 동측 상지의 피부 감각 변화 비교

A Comparison of Ipsilateral Upper Limb Sensory Changes after Mastectomy Alone and Mastectomy with Immediate Breast Reconstruction

  • 김정민 (전남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 유성인 (전남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김의식 (전남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 황재하 (전남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 김광석 (전남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실) ;
  • 이삼용 (전남대학교 의과대학 성형외과학교실)
  • Kim, Jeong Min (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Yoo, Sung In (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Eui Sik (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Hwang, Jae Ha (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Kim, Kwang Seog (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School) ;
  • Lee, Sam Yong (Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chonnam National University Medical School)
  • 투고 : 2008.02.27
  • 심사 : 2008.08.05
  • 발행 : 2008.10.15

초록

Purpose: Sensory changes in the upper limb are complications of a mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction with the treatment of breast cancer. The purpose of this study is to clarify whether immediate breast reconstruction worsens the sensory changes. Methods: From March 2004 to December 2005, 20 patients who had a mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction(reconstruction group) were compared with 23 patients who had a mastectomy alone(control group). All patients had stage I or II breast cancer. The sensory changes were assessed in a blind manner by one examiner that used light touch sensation, static two-point discrimination, pain, vibration, hot and cold temperature perception. The sensory changes were identified along the sensory dermatome for diagnosing the damaged nerves. The following factors and their relationship with the sensory changes were analyzed : age, complications, and the mastectomy method. Results: There was no statistical difference in the static two-point discrimination, pain, vibration, hot and cold temperature perception between the two groups. However, the ability to recognize light touch was significantly better(p=0.045) in the reconstruction group than in the control group. The main site of sensory change was the proximal and medial portion of the upper limb in both groups. At these sites, the mean value of Semmes-Weinstein monofilament was $1.01g/mm^2$(reconstruction group 0.82, control group 1.17) and 2-point discrimination was 51.74(converted to perfect score of 100; reconstruction group 42.50, control group 59.78). The total rate of early complications was found to be significantly lower(p=0.006) in the reconstruction group than in the control group. Conclusion: These findings suggest that an immediate breast reconstructive procedure following a mastectomy is as safe as or safer than a mastectomy alone with respect to postoperative sensory changes of the ipsilateral upper limb.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Moore KL, Dalley AF: Clinically oriented anatomy. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Lippincot Williams & Wilkins., 1999, p 682
  2. Turner A, Foster M, Johnson SE: Occupational therapy for physical dysfunction. 5th ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders., 2002, p 159
  3. Levin S, Pearsall G, Ruderman RJ: Von Frey's method of measuring pressure sensibility in the hand: An engineering analysis of the Weinstein-Semmes pressure aesthesiometer. J Hand Surg(Am) 3: 211, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-5023(78)80084-7
  4. Slezak S, McGibbon B, Dellon AL: The sensational transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous(TRAM) flap: Return of sensibility after TRAM breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 28: 210, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199203000-00004
  5. van Vliet D, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE: Duration of contact time alters cutaneous pressure threshold measurements. Ann Plast Surg 31: 335, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199310000-00010
  6. Sung KY, Ahn HC, Hwang WJ, Jo DI: Sensory restoration of abdomen after free TRAM flap for breast reconstruction. J Korean Soc Plast Reconstr Surg 32: 71, 2005
  7. Wilke LG, McCall LM, Posther KE, Whitworth PW, Reintgen DS, Leitch AM, Gabram SG, Lucci A, Cox CE, Hunt KK, Herndon JE 2nd, Giuliano AE: Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: Results from a prospective international cooperative group trial. Ann Surg Oncol 13: 491, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1245/ASO.2006.05.013
  8. Godfrey PM, Godfrey NV, Fast A, Kemeny M: Bilateral brachial plexus palsy after immediate breast reconstruction with TRAM flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 93: 1078; discussion 1080-1081, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199404001-00029
  9. Vinton AL, Traverso LW, Zehring RD: Immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy is as safe as mastectomy alone. Arch Surg 125: 1303, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1990.01410220087012
  10. Tasmuth T, von Smitten K, Hietanen P, Kataja M, Kalso E: Pain and other symptoms after different treatment modalities of breast cancer. Ann Oncol 6: 453, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.annonc.a059215