한국지하수토양환경학회지:지하수토양환경 (Journal of Soil and Groundwater Environment)

  • 제13권6호
  • /
  • Pages.50-61
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 1598-6438(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-8831(eISSN)
한국지하수토양환경학회 (Korean Society of Soil and Groundwater Environment)
권호 표지

수치, 해석적, 준 해석적 및 해석적 방법을 통합한 새로운 입자추적기술 개발

Development of new integrated particle tracking techniques combining the numerical method, semi-analytical method, and analytical method

  • Suk, Hee-Jun (Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources)
  • 발행 : 2008.12.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구를 통해서 율러리안-라그랑지안 방법(ELM)의 본질적인 문제점인 입자추적오차에 의해 발생되는 질량오차를 최소화하기 위해서, 새로운 통합 입자 추적 방법이 개발되었다. 새로운 통합입자 추적 방법은 시간 간격 내에서 시공간의 속도변화를 동시에 고려한 수치 해석적 방법, 준해석적 방법, 그리고 해석적 방법을 결합시킨 것이다. 수치 해석적 방법, 준해석적 방법, 그리고 해석적 방법의 수학적 유도를 자세히 나타내었고, 네 가지 예제를 만들어서 개발된 통합입자추적방법을 해석해 및 4차 룬지쿠타 방법과의 비교를 통해서 검증하였을 뿐만 아니라 기존의 입자추적방법인 Lu의 방법과 비교를 통해서 우수성을 보였다.

In this study, new integrated particle tracking algorithm was developed to reduce the inherent problem of Eulerian- Lagrangian method, or adverse effect of particle tracking error on mass balance error. The new integrated particle tracking algorithm includes numerical method, semi-analytical method, and analytical method which consider both temporal and spatial changes of velocity field during time step. Detail of mathematical derivations is well illustrated and four examples are made to verify through the comparison of the new integrated particle tracking with analytical solution or Runge-Kutta method. Additionally, It was shown that the there is better superiority of the new integrated particle tracking algorithm over other existing particle tracking method such as Lu's method.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 석희준, 2006, 효율적인 수치 모델링 기법 개발을 위한 ELLAM과 LEZOOMPC의 비교분석, 한국지하수토양환경학회지, 11(1), 37-44
  2. Baptista, A.M., Adams, E., and Stolzenbach, K., 1984, Eulerian-Lagrangian analysis of pollutant transport in shallow water, Rep. 296, R.M. Parsons Lab. for Water Resour. and Hydrodyn., Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge
  3. Baptista, A.M., 1987, Solution of advection-dominated transport by Eulerian-Lagrangian methods using the backward methods of characteristics, Ph.D. thesis, Dep. of Civ. Eng., Mass. Inst. of Technol., Cambridge
  4. Bear, J., 1979, Hydraulics of groundwater, New York: McGraw-Hill, p. 567
  5. Bensabat, J., Zhou, Q., and Bear, J., 2000, An adaptive path linebased particle tracking algorithm for the Eulerian-Lagrangian method, Advances in Water Resources, 23(4), 383-397 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(99)00025-1
  6. Celia, M.A., Russell, T.F., Herrera, I., and Ewing, R.E., 1990, An Eulerian-Lagrangian localized adjoint method for the advection-diffusion equation, Adv. Water Resour., 13, 187-206 https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1708(90)90041-2
  7. Cheng, H.P., Cheng, J.R., and Yeh, G.T., 1996, A particle tracking technique for the Lagrangian Eulerian finite element method in multi-dimensions, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 39, 1115-1136 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19960415)39:7<1115::AID-NME895>3.0.CO;2-4
  8. Douglas, J. and Russell, T.F., 1982, Numerical methods for convection-dominated diffusion problems based on combining the method of characteristics with finite element or finite difference procedures, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 19, 871-885 https://doi.org/10.1137/0719063
  9. Goode, D.J., 1990, Particle velocity interpolation in block-centered finite difference groundwater flow models, Water Resources Research, 26(5), 925-940
  10. Healy, R.W. and Russell, T.F., 1998, Solution of the advectiondispersion equation in two dimensions by a finite-volume Eulerian-Lagrangian localized adjoint method, Adv. Water Resour., 21(1), 11-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(96)00033-4
  11. Konikow, L.F., Goode, D.J., and Hornberger, G.Z., 1996, A three-dimensional model of characteristics solute-transport model (MOC3D), U.S. Geological Survey, Water Resources Investigation, Report 96-4267, p. 99
  12. Leonard, B.P., 1988, Universal limiter for transient interpolation modeling of advective transport equations: The ULTIMATE conservative difference scheme, NASA Tech. Memo. 100916
  13. Leonard, B.P. and Mokhtari, S., 1990, Beyond first-order unwinding: The ULTRA-SHARP alternative for non-oscillatory steady-state simulation of convection, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 30, 729-866 https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.1620300412
  14. Lu, N., 1994, A semianalytical method of path line computation for transient finite difference groundwater flow models, Water Resources Research, 30(8), 2449-2459 https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR01219
  15. Oliveira, A. and Baptista, A.M., 1998, On the role of tracking on Eulerian-Lgrangian solutions of the transport equation, Advances in Water Resources, 21(7), 539-554 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(97)00022-5
  16. Pokrajac, D. and Lazic, R., 2002, An efficient algorithm for high accuracy particle tracking in finite elements, Advances in Water Resources, 25(4), 353-369 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1708(02)00012-X
  17. Pollock, D.W., 1988, Semianalytical computation of path lines for finite-difference models, Ground Water, 26(6), 743-750 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1988.tb00425.x
  18. Pollock, D.W., 1994, User's guide for MODPATH/MODPATHPLOT, Version 3: a particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW. The US Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow models, US Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-464, p. 249
  19. Russell, T.F., 1990, Eulerian-Lagrangian localized adjoint methods for advection-dominated problems. In Numerical Analysis, 1989, Pitman Res. Notes Math, Series, Vol. 228, ed. D.F. Griffiths & G.A. Watson. Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, U.K., 206-228
  20. Suk, H. and Yeh, G.T., 2007, 3D, three-phase flow simulations using the Lagrangian-Eulerian approach with adaptively zooming and peak/valley capturing scheme, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE, 12(1), 14-32 https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:1(14)
  21. Suk, H. and Yeh, G.T., 2008, A multi-dimensional finite element particle tracking method for solving complex transient flow problem, in press Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
  22. Williamson, D.L. and Rasch, P.J., 1988, Two-dimensional semi-Lagrangian transport with shape preserving interpolation, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 102-109 https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0102:TDSLTW>2.0.CO;2
  23. Yeh, G.T., 1990, A Lagrangian-Eulerian method with zoomable hidden fine-mesh approach to solving advection-dispersion equations, Water Resour. Res., 26(6), 1133-1144 https://doi.org/10.1029/WR026i006p01133
  24. Yeh, G.T., Cheng, J.R., Gwo, J.P., Lin, H.C., Richards, D.R., and Martin, W.D., 1992, 3DFEMWATER/3DLEWASTE Numerical code for delineating wellhead protection areas in agricultural regions based on the assimilative capacity criterion, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/R-92/223, p. 256
  25. Zheng, C., 1990, MT3D user's manual: a modular three-dimensional transport model for simulation of advection, dispersion, and chemical reactions of contaminants in groundwater systems, S.S. Papadopulos and Associates, p. 163