초록
본 연구에서는 해안 매립도시인 안산시 철도변 완충녹지를 대상으로 완충녹지의 문제점을 분석하고, 완충녹지의 공간기능과 식재개념에 적합한 식재방안을 제시하였다. 안산시 철도별 완충녹지의 식재밀도는 $0.04{\sim}0.17$주/$m^2$ 이었고, 녹지용적계수는 $0.15{\sim}1.65m^3/m^2$로 녹량이 부족하여 완충기능이 미흡하였다. 마운딩 완충녹지의 토양경도는 $2.72{\sim}15kg/cm^2$로 식생생육에 적합하지 않았다. 완충녹지의 기능을 향상시키기 위해 야생조류 서식 측면의 생물서식기능, 주변 토지이용 측면의 도시공원기능, 식재수종 계절성 측면의 경관개선기능을 검토하였다. 완충녹지를 기능에 따라 생물서식기능의 완충녹지, 완충 및 경관개선기능의 완충녹지, 경관 및 도시공원기능의 완충녹지, 완충 및 생물서식기능의 완충녹지로 재설정하였다. 완충기능 식재방안에서는 곰솔 등을 주요종으로 선정하고, 교목종 0.4주/$m^2$, 관목종 0.5주/$m^2$로 식재밀도를 설정하였고, 경관개선 기능에서는 느티나무, 산벚나무, 살구나무 등을 주요종으로 선정하고 교목종 0.2주/$m^2$, 관목종 0.5주/$m^2$로 식재밀도를 설정하였다. 생물서식기능에서는 상수리나무, 산벚나무, 팥배나무 등을 주요종으로 선정하고, 적정 식재 밀도를 교목종 0.06주/$m^2$, 아교목종 0.1주/$m^2$, 관목종 0.8주/$m^2$로 식재밀도를 제시하였다.
This study analysed problems of railroadside buffer green space and suggested planting methods according to space function and planting concept in seashore reclaimed land, Ansan city. Planting density of railroadside buffer green zone of Ansan city was $0.04{\sim}0.17tree/m^2$, GVZ was $0.15{\sim}1.65m^3/m^2$ which is represented of deficiency of buffer function. In addition, soil hardness of mounded buffer green zone was $2.72{\sim}15kg/cm^2$. It was examined to have functions in terms of habitat for wildbirds and other organisms, surrounding landuse, urban greens, seasonality, landscape for function improvement of buffer green space. Functions of buffer green space were re-established as habitat for organism, buffer and landscape improvement, landscape and urban park, buffer zone and habitat. It was suggested to select Pinus thunbergii as a dominated species of planting method for buffer function and planting density in canopy and under-canopy layer was $0.4tree/m^2$, $0.5/m^2$ in shrub layer. In terms of landscape improvement function, Zelkova serrata, Prunus sargentii and Prunus armeniaca were selected as major species and it in canopy and under-canopy layer was $0.2tree/m^2$ and $0.5tree/m^2$ in shrub layer. In terms of habitat function Quercus acutissima, Prunus sargentii and Sorbus alnifolia were as major species and it in canopy layer was $0.06tree/m^2$, $0.1tree/m^2$ in under canopy layer, $0.8tree/m^2$ in shrub layer.
