Korean Journal of Ecology and Environment (생태와환경)

The Korean Society of Limnology (한국수생태학회)
권호 표지

Ecological Comparisons of Stream Conditions Between the Unimpacted and Impacted Sites: Case Study

  • Lee, Jae-Hoon (Department of Biology, School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Sang-Jae (Department of Biology, School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • An, Kwang-Guk (Department of Biology, School of Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chungnam National University)
  • Published : 2008.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze chemical water quality, fish trophic guilds, tolerance indicators, and fish community conditions in the Gap Stream and to compare the stream conditions between the unimpacted site and impacted site. This study was conducted in the physically stable season (May 2008) to minimize physical impacts such as flow and hydrological disturbance, and applied the study in the Gap Stream with two sites of unimpacted upstream site (Unim-S), mainly surrounded by forested area and impacted site (Im-S), influenced by the wastewater disposal plants and industrial complex in the urban region. Chemical data analysis showed that the degree of organic matter pollution, based on BOD, and COD, was $2{\sim}3$ fold greater in the Im-S than the Unim-S, and that TP, as eutrophication indicators, was 4.7 fold greater in the Im-S. Also, $NH_3-N$ was in 8.2 fold greater in the Im-S ($6.25\;mg\;L^{-1}$) than the Unim-S ($0.76\;mg\;L^{-1}$), indicating a massive influence of wastewater from the disposal plant. Similar results were found in other chemical parameters. Thus, chemical impacts in the Im-S were evident, compared to the unimpacted site. Evaluations of tolerant indicator species indicated that sensitive species were dominant in the Unim-S (23.9%) and tolerant species were dominant (97.8%) in the Im-S. Condition factor (CF) was averaged 0.95 ($0.68{\sim}1.18$) in the Unim-S and 1.08 ($0.93{\sim}1.22$) in the Im-S. Fish community in the Unim-S and Im-S was categorized as Zacco-community and Hemibarbus-community, respectively, and the community diversity index (H') was significantly (p<0.05) higher in the Unim-S (0.810) than the Im-S (0.466). Overall, our results suggest that the comparison approach of various chemical and ecological indicators provide important information in identifying multiple stressors in the stream ecosystems.

Keywords

References

  1. An, K-G. and J.H. Kim. 2005. A diagnosis of ecological health using a physical habitat assessment and multimetric fish model in Daejeon stream. Korean Journal of Limnology 38: 361-371
  2. An, K-G. and S.S. Park. 2002. Indirect influence of the summer monsoon on chlorophyll-total phosphorus models in reservoirs: a case study. Ecological Modelling 152: 191-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00020-0
  3. An, K-G., D.H. Yeom and S.K. Lee. 2001a. Rapid bioassessments of Kap stream using the Index of Biological Integrity. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 19: 261-269
  4. An, K-G., J.Y. Lee, D.Y. Bae, J.H. Kim, S.J. Hwang, D.H. Won, J.K. Lee and C.S. Kim. 2006. Ecological assessments of aquatic environment using multi-metric model in major nationwide stream watersheds. Journal of Korean Water Quality 22: 796-804
  5. An, K-G., S.H. Jung and S.S. Choi. 2001b. An evaluation on health conditions of Pyong-Chang river using the index of biological integrity (IBI) and qualitative habitat evaluation index (QHEI). Korean Journal of Limnology 34: 153-165
  6. An, K-G. and S-S. Choi. 2003. An assessment of aquatic ecosystem health in a temperate watershed using the index of biological integrity. Journal of environmental science and health part A 38: 1115-1130 https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120019868
  7. An, K-G., Y-P. Hong, J-K. Kim and S-S. Choi. 1992. Studies on zonation and community Analysis of freshwater fish in Kum-River. Korean Journal of Limnology 25: 99-112
  8. Anderson, O.R. and R.M. Neumann. 1996. Length, weight, and associated structural indices, p. 447- 482. In: L.A. Nielsen and D.L. Johnson (Eds). Fisheries techniques, Bethesda, American fishery society, p. 732
  9. Cho, K.A., P.K. Ahn, S.G. Hong, and D.O. Chung. 1999. A study n characteristics of water quality and degradation rates of organic phosphates in Young- San river. Journal of Korean Environmental Sciences 8: 691-697
  10. Choi, J.K., H.K. Byeon and H.K. Seok. 2000. Studies on the dynamics of fish community in Wonju Stream. Korean Journal of Limnology 33: 274-281
  11. Jeon, S.R. 1980. For the distribution of freshwater fish in Korea. Ph.D. thesis. Chungang University, Seoul
  12. Judy, R.D. Jr., P.N. Seeley, T.M. Murray, S.C. Svirsky, M.R. Whiworth and L.S. Ischinger. 1984. National Fisheries Survey. Vol. 1. Technical Report: initial findings. United States Fish and Wildlife Service. FWS/OBS-84/06
  13. Karr, J.R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities. Fisheries 6: 21-27 https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8446(1981)006<0021:AOBIUF>2.0.CO;2
  14. Kim, I.S. and J.Y. Park. 2002. Freshwater fish of Korea. Kyo-Hak Publishing Co., Ltd., Korea
  15. Lee, E-H. and K-G. An. 2007a. Preliminary studies on mercury bioaccumulation within various fish tissues as heavy metal stressor in aquatic ecosystems. Korean Journal of Limnology 40: 569-575
  16. Lee, E-H., S-H. Yoon, J.H. Lee and K-G. An. 2008. Total mercury contents in the tissue of Zacco platypus and ecological health assessments in association with stream habitat characteristics. Korean Journal of Limnology 41: 188-197
  17. Lee, J.H. and K-G. An. 2007b. Seasonal dynamics of fish fauna and compositions in the Gap stream along with conventional water quality. Korean Journal of Limnology 40: 503-510
  18. Margalef, R. 1958. Information theory in ecology. General Systems 3: 36-71
  19. Ohio EPA. 1989. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Vol.III, Standardized biological field sampling and laboratory method for assessing fish and macroinvertebrate communities. U.S.A
  20. Pielou, E.C. 1975. Ecological diversity. Wiley. New York. p. 165
  21. Ra, J.S., S.D. Kim, N.I. Chang and K-G. An. 2007. Ecological health assessments based on whole effluent toxicity tests and the index of biological integrity in temperate streams influenced by wastewater treatment plant effluents. Journal of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 26: 2010-2018 https://doi.org/10.1897/06-542R.1
  22. Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver. 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
  23. Simpson, E.H. 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688 https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
  24. Strahler, A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. American Geophysical Union Transactions 38: 913-920 https://doi.org/10.1029/TR038i006p00913
  25. US EPA. 1991. Technical support document for water quality-based toxic control. EPA 505-2-90-001. US EPA, Office of Water, Washington D.C., USA
  26. US EPA. 2000. Test Methods for Evaluationg Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods: Method #7473, SW 846, Update IVA, UG GPO, Washington DC., USA
  27. Yeom, D.H., K-G. An, Y.P. Hong and S.K. Lee. 2000. Assessment of an index of biological integrity (IBI) using fish assemblages in Keum-Ho River, Korea. Korean Journal of Environmental Biology 18: 215-226
  28. Yeom, D.H., S.A. Lee, G.S. Kang, J. Seo and S.K. Lee. 2007. Stressor identification and health assessment of fish exposed to wastewater effluents in Miho Stream, South Korea. Chemosphere 67: 2282-2292 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.09.071