Journal of Aquaculture (한국양식학회지)

The Korean Society of Fisheries and Aquatic Science (한국양식학회)
권호 표지

Comparison of Anesthetic Tolerance between the Wild and Cultured Fish, Black Seabream Acanthopagrus schlegeli Juvenile

감성돔 자연산 치어와 양식산 치어의 마취 내성 비교

  • Son, Maeng-Hyun (Aquaculture Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute) ;
  • Lim, Han-Kyu (Aquaculture Research Division, National Fisheries Research and Development Institute)
  • 손맹현 (국립수산과학원 양식관리과) ;
  • 임한규 (국립수산과학원 양식관리과)
  • Published : 2008.11.25
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Strength of juvenile black seabream (Acanthopagrus schlegeli) produced in the different types of hatchery for wild stock enhancement was evaluated in terms of resistances against anesthetizing agent, tricaine methane sulfonate (MS-222), and dry exposure. The working dosages of MS-222 varied significantly with two different water temperature and hatchery populations. Namely, water temperature $22^{\circ}C$ populations were less resistant against the chemical over water temperature $12^{\circ}C$ ones. MS-222 effects also differed with the fish with different growth histories. The fish seeds in collected from wild showed stronger resistances, earlier recoveries, and lower mortalities, compared to those cultured in land-based tank. Similar results were achieved in the juveniles challenged to dry exposure. These results suggest that wild population of black seabream are more resistant against anesthetic stress, expressed as anesthesia, recovery, and mortality, and further that the population are "healthier" than others.

MS-222 농도별로 자연산 및 양식산 감성돔 치어의 마취효과를 비교하면 수온 $22^{\circ}C$ 고수온구가 $12^{\circ}C$의 저수온구에 비해 마취 및 회복시간이 빨랐으며, 수온 $12^{\circ}C$의 저수온에서는 자연산이 양식산에 비하여 마취 및 회복이 빨랐다. MS-222 100 ppm 농도에서 침지시간별 회복 조사에서도 $22^{\circ}C$ 실험구가 $12^{\circ}C$의 저수온 실험구에 비해 회복시간이 빨랐으며, 수온 $12^{\circ}C$의 동일 수온에서의 자연산과 양식산 치어를 비교했을 시에는 자연산 치어가 양식산 치어에 비해 마취후 회복이 빨랐다. MS-222 100 ppm에 3분간 침지후 공기중 노출시간에 따른 회복시간 조사 결과도 마찬가지로 $22^{\circ}C$ 실험구가 $12^{\circ}C$의 저수온에 비해 회복시간이 빨랐으며, 수온 $12^{\circ}C$에서는 자연산 치어가 양식산 치어에 비해 회복이 다소 빨랐다. 그러나 공기중에 노출시간이 15분 이상인 경우에 $12^{\circ}C$의 저수온 실험 구에서 수온 $22^{\circ}C$의 고수온구에 비해 회복이 빨랐다. 수온 $12^{\circ}C$에서는 자연산이 양식산 치어에 비해 회복이 빨랐다. 따라서 자연산 감성돔 치어가 양식산 치어에 비하여 마취 및 공기중 노출 내성이 강함을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Barton, B. A. and R. E. Peter, 1982. Plasma cortisol stress response in fingerling rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri Richardson, to Various transport conditions, anaesthesia, and cold shock. J. Fish Biol., 20, 39−51
  2. Carrasco, S., H. Sumano and R. Navahro-Fierro, 1984. The use of lidocaine-sodium bicarbonate as anaesthetic in fish. Aquaculture, 41, 395−398
  3. Gilderhus, P. A. and L. L. Marking, 1987. Comparative efficacy of 16 anesthetic chemicals om rainbow trout. North Am. J. Fish. Manage., 7, 288−292
  4. Hikasa, Y., K. Takase, T. Ogasawara, and S. Ogasawara, 1986. Anesthesia and recovery with tricaine methanesulfonate, eugenol and thiopental sodium in the carp, Cyprinus carpio. Jap. J. Vet. Sci., 48, 341−351
  5. Massee, K.C., M.B. Rust, R.W. Hardy and R.S. Stickney, 1995. The effeciveness of tricaine, quinaldine sulfate and metomidate as anesthetics for larval fish. Aquaculture, 134, 351−359
  6. Mattson, N.S. and T.H. Riple, 1989. Metomidate, a better anesthetic for cod, Gadus Morhua in comparison with benzocaine, MS-222, chlorobutanol, and phenozyethanol. Aquaculture, 83, 89−94 https://doi.org/10.1016/0044-8486(89)90063-X
  7. Murai, T. and M.R. Catacutan, 1981. Effect of 20-phenoxy ehhanol and MS-222 on milkfish fingerlings, Chanos chanos as anesthetic agents. O. Res. Rep. Aquacult. Dep. Southeast Asian Fish. Dev. Cent., 5, 19−21
  8. Piper, R. G., I. B. McElwain, L. E. Orme, J. P. McCrare, L. G. Fowler, and J. R. Leonard, 1982. Fish Hatchery Management. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington D.C
  9. Rust, M.B., R.W. Hardy and R.R. Stickney, 1993. A new method for force-feeding larval fish. Aquaculture, 116, 341−352
  10. Schnick, R. A., F. P. Meyer, and D. L. Gray, 1986. A guide to approved chemicals in fish production and fishery resources management. University of Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service, Little Rock
  11. Siwicki, A., 1984. New anesthetic for fish. Aquaculture, 38, 171−176
  12. Smit, G. L., J. Hattingh and A. P. Burger, 1979. Hematological assessment of the effects of the anaesthetic MS 222 in natural and neutralized form in three freshwater species : intraspecies differences. J. Fish Biol., 5, 645−653
  13. Smith, D. A., S. A. Smith, and S. D. Holladay, 1999. Effect of previous exposure to tricaine methanesulfonate on time to anesthesia in hybrid tilapias. J. Aquat. Anim. Health., 11, 183−186
  14. Son, M.H., M.W. Park, J.I. Myeong, D.J. Kim, B.H. Kim, O.T. Jo and I.G. Jeon, 2001. Anaesthetic tolerance of juvenile black rockfish Sebastes schlegeli, produced for wild stock enhancement. Ocean Pol. Res., 23, 285−290
  15. Waterstrat, P. R., 1999. Induction and recovery from anesthesia in channel catfish Ictalurus punctatus fingerlings exposed to clove oil. J. World. Aquacult. Soc., 30, 250−255
  16. 黑倉 壽, 1992. 健苗性試驗としての耐性試驗. 平成4年度栽培漁業技術硏修事業基礎理論コ-ス仔稚魚期の發育シリ-ズ 7, 日栽漁協, 13 pp
  17. Chung, J. K., S. Y. Chung, T. W. Lee and D. L. Choi, 1994. Effects of lidocaine on haematology and blood chemistry in the carp (Cyprinus carpio). J. Fish Pathol., 7, 53−62