DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Preparation and Characterization of a Propofol-loaded Polymeric Micellar System: Nanoparticular Stability

  • 발행 : 2008.12.20

초록

A propofol delivery system was prepared using two biocompatible polymeric surfactants, poloxamer 407 and PEG 400. The nanoparticular stability of the micellar system was evaluated in terms of temperature change, storage time and composition. The particle size of the system was slightly increased with elevating temperature from $4^{\circ}C$ to $25^{\circ}C$, but its distribution was unimodal. At $40^{\circ}C$, the system presented a bimodal particle size distribution and the increase in the fraction of particles larger than 15 nm. This result might be due to the expansion of the nanoparticles through micellar swelling at the high temperature. It was found that propofol was gradually come out of the system, stored for a month at three different temperatures (4, 25 and $40^{\circ}C$). The drug loss was apparently dependent on temperature and the system composition. Increasing temperature induced the acceleration of the drug loss of $7{\sim}10%$ at $4^{\circ}C$ and $14{\sim}16 %$ at $40^{\circ}C$. This may be owing to the high diffusivity resulting from the swelling of the hydrophilic surface of the nanoparticle at high temperature. However, the addition of PEG 400 to the system led to the reduction of the drug loss. This result is associated with the previous investigation that PEG coverage decreased diffusion coefficient because of the formation of the denser structure on the surface of nanoparticulate. Nevertheless, the limited amount of PEG, less than 2% (w/v), should be used to prevent the precipitation and discoloration of the system.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. Dutta, Y. Matsumoto, A. Muramatsu, M. Fukuoka and W. F. Ebling, Steaty-state propofol brain:plasma and brain:blood partion coefficients and the effect-site equilibration paradox, Br. J. Anaesth., 81, 422-424 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/81.3.422
  2. A. Deonicke, W. Lorenz, D. Stanworth, T. Duka and J.B. Glen, Effects of propofol (Diprivan) on histamine release, immunoglobulin levels and activation of complement in healthy volunteers, Postgraduate Medical Journal., 61, 15-20 (1985) https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.61.711.15
  3. E.P. Steegers and P.A. Foster, Propofol in total intravenous anesthesia without nitrous oxide, Anaesthesia, 43, 94-97 (1988) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1988.tb09085.x
  4. M.B. Sosis, B. Braverman and E. Villaflor, Propofol, but Not Thiopental, Supports the Growth of Candida albicans, Anesthesia & Analgesia., 81, 132-134 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1097/00000539-199507000-00026
  5. G. Carrasco, R. Monila and J. Costa, Propofol vs midazolam in short-, medium-, and long-term sedation of critically ill patients, A cost-benefit analysis. Chest., 103, 557-564 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.103.2.557
  6. C.B. Jones and J.H. Platt, Propofol composition containing edetate, US patent 5714520 (1998)
  7. M.L. Veryries, G. Gouarraze, S. Geiger, F. Agnely, L. Massias, B. Kunzli, F. Faurisson and B. Rouveix, Controlled release of vancomycin formulation from poloxamer 407 gels, Int. J. Pharm., 192, 183-193 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(99)00307-5
  8. J. Cho, M.C. Heuzey, A. Begin and P.J. Carreau, Physical gelation of chitosan in the presence of beta-glycerophospahte: the effect of temperature, Biomacromolecules., 6, 3267-3275 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1021/bm050313s
  9. M.R. Kasaai, G. Charlet and J. Arul, Master curve for concentration dependence of semi-dilute solution viscosity of chitosan homogues: the Martin equation, Food Res. Int., 33, 63-67 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-9969(00)00024-7
  10. J. Molpeceres, M. Guzman, P. Bustamante and M. Del Rosario Aberturas, Exothermic-endothermic heat of solution shift of cyclosprin A realted to poloxamer 188 behavior in aqueous solutions, Int. J. Pharm., 130, 75-81 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(95)04294-6
  11. N. Faisant, J. Siepmann and J.P. Benoit, PLGA-based microparticles: elucidation of mechanisms and a new, simple mathematical model quantifying drug release, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 15, 355-366 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0928-0987(02)00023-4
  12. T. Koizumi and S.P. Panomsuk, Poly-(glycolide-co-lactide) decomposition kinetics in suspension: theoretical aspects, Int. J. Pharm., 116, 45-49 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(94)00270-F
  13. T. Higuchi, Rate of release of medicaments from ointment bases containing drugs in suspensions, J. Pharm. Sci., 50, 874-975 (1961) https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600501018
  14. T. Higuchi, Mechanisms of sustained action mediation. Theoretical analysis-of rate of release of solid drugs dispersed in solid matrices, J. Pharm. Sci., 52, 1145-1149 (1963) https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.2600521210
  15. T.M. Squires and T.F. Brady, A simple paradigm for active and nonlinear microrheology, Phys. Flu., 17, 73-101 (2005)
  16. B. Falk, S. Garramone and S. Shivkumar, Diffusion coefficient of paracetamol in a chitosan hydrogel, Mater. Let., 58, 3261-3265 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2004.05.072
  17. David R. Lide, ed., CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 73rd Edition, CRC Press/Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL (1992)
  18. M. D. Krasowski, K. Nishikawa, N. Nikolaeva, A. Lin and N.L. Harrison, Neuropharmacology., 41, 952-964 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3908(01)00141-1
  19. J. Siepmann, F. Lecomte and R. Bodmeier, Diffusion-controlled drug delivery systems: calculation of the required composition to achieve desired release profiles, J. control. release., 60, 379-389 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(99)00093-0
  20. P.V. Krishna Pant and R.H. Boyd, Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Diffusion of Small Penetrants in Polymers, Macromolecules., 26, 679-686 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1021/ma00056a019
  21. J.M. Zielinski and J.L. Duda, Predicting polymer/solvent diffusion coefficients using free-volume theory, AlChE Journal., 38, 405-415 (1992) https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.690380309
  22. H. Takeuchi, R.J. Roe and J.E. Mark, Molecular dynamics simulation of diffusion of small molecules in polymers. II. Effect of free volume distribution, J. Chem. Phys., 93, 9042 (1990) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.459194
  23. H. Liu, N. Finn and M.Z. Yates, Encapsulation and sustained release of a model drug, Indomethacin, using $CO_2$-based microencapsulation, Langmuir., 379-385 (2005)