The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

WETTABILITY AND DRUG DELIVERY OF FUNCTIONALLY GRADED NANO-MICRO POROUS TITANIUM SURFACE

  • Yun, Kwi-Dug (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam University) ;
  • Vang, Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam University) ;
  • Yang, Hong-So (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam University) ;
  • Park, Ha-Ok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Pil (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam University)
  • Published : 2008.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: It is known that an anodic oxidation technique, one of the methods for the implant surface treatment, remarkably increased surface area, enhanced wettability and accelerated the initial bone healing. Purpose: This study was performed to evaluate the wettability of anodized titanium surface which has a nanotubular structure, to assess osseointegration after the placement of implant with nano-size tubes on tibia of rats and to analyze quantitatively transferable rhBMP-2 on each surface. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Four different kinds of surface-treated titanium discs (polished (machined surface) group, micro (blasting surface) group, nano (anodizedmachined surface) group, and nano-micro (anodized-blasting surface) group) were fabricated (n=10). Three different media were chosen to measure the surface contact angles; distilled water, plasma and rhBMP-2 solution. After a single drop (0.025 $m{\ell}$) of solution, the picture was taken with the image camera, and contact angle was measured by using image analysis system. For the test of osseointegration, 2 kinds of anodized surface (anodized-machined surface, anodized-blasting surface) implants having 2.0 mm in diameter and 5.0 mm in length inserted into the tibia of Wistar rats. After 3 weeks, tibia were harvested and the specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for histological analysis. To test the possibility of drug delivery, after soaking sample groups in the concentration of 250 ng/$m{\ell}$l of rhBMP-2 for 48 hours, the excess solution of rhBMP-2 were removed. After that, they were lyophilized for 24 hours, and then the rhBMP-2 on the surface of titanium was resolved for 72 hours in PBS. All the extracted solution was analyzed by ELISA. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed on the data. RESULTS: The wettability is improved by anodic oxidation. The best wettability was shown on the nano-micro group, and it was followed by nano group, micro group, and polished group. In the histological findings, all implants showed good healing and the new bone formation were observed along the implant surface. After 3 days, nano-micro group delivered the most amount of rhBMP-2, followed by nano group, micro group, and polished group. CONCLUSION: It indicated that anodic oxidation on blasting surface produce functionally graded nano-micro porous structure and enhance hydrophilicity of the surface and osseointegration. The findings suggest that the nano-micro porous structure could be a useful carrier of osteogenic molecules like rhBMP-2.

Keywords

References

  1. Lampin M, Warocquier C, Legris C, Degrange M, Sigot- Luizard MF. Correlation between substratum roughness and wettability, cell adhesion, and cell migration. J Biomed Mater Res 1997;36:99-108 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199707)36:1<99::AID-JBM12>3.0.CO;2-E
  2. Cho CS, Kobayashi A, Goto M, Park KH, Akaide T. Difference in adhesion and proliferation of fibroblast between Langmuir-Blodgett films and cast surfaces of poly (gamma-benzyl L-glutamate)/ poly(ethylene oxide) diblock copolymer. J Biomed Mater Res 1996;32:425-32 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199611)32:3<425::AID-JBM16>3.0.CO;2-F
  3. Smith DC, Pilliar RM, Metson JB, McIntyre NS. Dental implant materials. II. Preparative procedures and surface spectroscopic studies. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:1069- 84 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250903
  4. Lim YJ, Oshida Y. Initial contact angle measurements on dental materials. Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering. 2001;11:325-41
  5. Mekayarajjananonth T, Winkler S. Contact angle measurement on dental implant biomaterials. J Oral Implantology 1999;25:230-6 https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(1999)025<0230:CAMODI>2.3.CO;2
  6. Berglundh T, Abrahamsson I, Lang NP, Lindhe J. De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants. A model study in the dog. Clin Oral Impl Res 2003;14:251-62 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
  7. Schenk RK, Buser D, Hardwick WR, Dahlin C. Healing pattern of bone regeneration in membrane-protected defects. A histologic study in the canine mandible. Int. J. Oral & Maxillo. Impl. 1994;9:13-29
  8. Ameen AP, Short RD, Johns R, Schwach G. The surface analysis of implant materials. 1. The surface composition of a titanium dental implant material. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993;4:144-50 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1993.040305.x
  9. Baier RE, Shafrin EG, Zisman WA. Adhesion: mechanisms that assist or impede it. Science 1968;162:1360-8 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3860.1360
  10. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004;25:1003-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00626-4
  11. Balaur E, Macak JM, Taveira L, Schmuki P. Tailoring the wettability of $TiO_2$ nanotube layers. Electrochemistry Communications 2005;7:1066-70 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2005.07.014
  12. Grinnell F. Cellular adhesiveness and extracellular substrata. Int Rev Cytol 1978;53:65-144 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7696(08)62241-X
  13. Aronov D, Rosen R, Ron EZ, Rosenman G. Tunable hydroxyapatite wettability: Effect on adhesion of biological molecules. Process Biochemistry 2006;41:2367-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2006.06.006
  14. Hosseinkhani H, Hosseinkhani M, Khademhosseini A, Kobayashi H. Bone regeneration through controlled release of bone morphogenetic protein-2 from 3-D tissue engineered nano-scaffold. J Controlled Release 2007;117:380-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.11.018
  15. Woo BH, Fink BF, Page R, Schrier JA, Jo YW, Jiang G, Deluca M, Vasconez HC, Deluca PP. Enhancement of bone growth by sustained delivery of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in a polymeric matrix. Pharmaceutical Research. 2001;18:1747-53 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013382832091
  16. Esposito M, Hirsch JM, Lekholm U, Thomsen P. Failure patterns of four ossointergrated oral implant systems. J Mater Sci Mat Med 1997;8:843-7 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018593403126
  17. Albrektsson T, Dahl E, Erbom LI. Osseointegrated oral implants. A Swedish multicenter study of 8139 consecutively inserted Nobelpharma implants. J Periodontal 1988;59:287-96 https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1988.59.5.287
  18. Keller JC, Dougherty WJ, Grotendorst GR, Wrightman JP. In vitro cell attachment to characterized cpTi surfaces. J Adhesion 1989;28:115-33 https://doi.org/10.1080/00218468908030878
  19. Keller JC, Draughn RA, Wrightman JP, Dougherty WJ. Characterization of sterilized CP titanium implant surfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:360-9
  20. Eckert SE, Parein A, Myshin HL, Padilla JL. Validation of dental implant systems through a review of the literature supplied by system manufacturers. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:271-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70184-7
  21. Kim HS, Park SW, Lee KM. Mechanism of Formation and Characteristics of $TiO_2$ Nanotube on Titanium by Anodizing. Department of Prosthodantics, Chonnam National University Graduate School, 2007.8
  22. Montanaro L, Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Cervellati M. In vitro effects on MG63 osteoblast-like cells following contact with two roughness-differing fluorohydroxyapatitecoated titanium alloys. Biomaterials 2002;23:3651-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00098-4
  23. Rodriguez R, Kim KH, Ong JL. In vitro osteoblast response to anodized titanium and anodized titanium followed by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 2003;65:352-8
  24. Zhu X, Ong JL, Kim SY, Kim KH. Surface characteristics and structure of anodic oxide films containing Ca and P on a titanium implant material. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;60:333-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.10105
  25. Clokie CM, Warshawsky H. Morphologic and radioautographic studies of bone formation in relation to titaniumimplants using the rat tibia as a model. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995;10:155-65
  26. Yanagisawa I, Sakuma H, Shimura M. Effects of 'wettability' of biomaterials on culture cells. J Oral Implantol 1989;15:168-77
  27. Sachse A. Osteointegration of hydroxyapatite-titanium implants coated with nonglycosylated recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) in aged sheep. Bone 2005;37:699-710 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.06.011
  28. Liu Y. BMP-2 liberated from biomimetic implant coatings induces and sustains direct ossification in an ectopic rat model. Bone 2005;36:745-57 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.02.005