The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

The comparison of microtensile bond strength with immediate and delayed dentin sealing

즉시 상아질 봉쇄와 지연 상아질 봉쇄에 따른 상아질 접착의 미세인장 결합강도 비교

  • Lee, Heung-Bae (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Chong-Hyun (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Shim, Jun-Sung (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Jai (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • 이흥배 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 한종현 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 심준성 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 김선재 (연세대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2008.08.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of various methods of dentin bonding agent application on microtensile bond strength between dentin and resin, using a 2-step etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agent. Material and methods: Twenty freshly extracted human molars were obtained and divided into 4 groups of 5 teeth. 2-step etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agent was used for all groups. The control specimens were prepared using a direct immediate bonding technique. The delayed dentin sealing (A, C) specimens were prepared using an indirect approach with delayed dentin sealing. For group A, resin was built-up on uncured dentin bonding agent, and for group C, resin was built-up on pre-cured dentin bonding agent. Preparation of the immediate dentin sealing (B) specimens also used an indirect approach with immediate dentin sealing immediately following preparation. All teeth were prepared for a microtensile bond strength test. Specimens were stored in water for 24 hours. Ten beams (1.0 ${\times}$ 1.0 ${\times}$ 11 mm) from each tooth were selected for testing. Bond strength data (MPa) were analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test, and post hoc comparison was done using the Scheffe's test. Results: The mean microtensile bond strengths of control group, B and C (DDS with pre-cure) were not statisticaaly different from each other at 32.7, 33.3, 34.2 MPa. the bond strength for group A (DDS without pre-cure), 19.5 MPa, was statistically different (P < .01) from the other 3 groups. Conclusion: When preparing teeth for indirect bonded restorations, DDS with pre-curing dentin bonding agent and IDS results in the same bond strength between dentin and resin. On the contrast, the bond strength was decreased when DDS without pre-curing dentin bonding agent was used.

연구목적: 본 연구의 목적은 즉시 상아질 봉쇄 (immediate dentin sealing; IDS)을 시행한 경우와 지연 상아질 봉쇄 (delayed dentin sealing ; DDS)를 시행한 경우를 비교하고, 지연 상아질 봉쇄 시 상아질 접착제를 먼저 중합한 경우와 복합레진과 함께 중합한 경우에 있어서 상아질과 복합레진의 결합강도를 비교하는 것이다. 재료 및 방법: 사람의 건전한 대구치 20개의 치관부를 삭제하여 상아질 표면을 노출시켰다. 상아질 접착 후 바로 복합레진을 축조하는 과정에서 군을 4 가지로 나누었다. 대조군은 주수 하에 model trimmer를 이용하여 치관부 삭제 후 바로 2-step etch-and-rinse dentin bonding agent (ONE-STEP, Bisco, USA)를 이용하여 상아질 접착을 시행하고 복합레진 (RENEW, Bisco, USA)을 수복하였다. 실험군 A는 치아 삭제 후, Fermit을 이용한 임시수복 상태로 5일간 생리식염수에 보관하였다. 임시수복 제거 후 상아질 접착제를 도포하고 별도의 중합없이 레진을 축조하고 함께 중합하였다. 실험군 B는 치아 삭제 후, 상아질 접착제 도포 및 중합하고 임시수복을 시행하여 5일간 생리식염수에 보관하였다. 임시수복 제거 후 상아질 접착제를 도포하고 별도의 중합없이 레진을 축조하고 함께 중합하였다. 실험군 C는 치아 삭제 후, 임시수복 상태로 5일간 생리식염수에 보관하였다. 임시수복 제거 후, 상아질 접착제를 도포 및 중합하고, 레진을 축조 및 중합하였다. 각 치아를 단면적 1 $mm^2$, 길이 10-12 mm의 막대형 시편으로 절단하여, 미세인장 결합강도를 측정하였다. 측정된 결합강도는 one-way ANOVA를 이용하여 비교 분석하였으며, 사후 검증은 Scheffe test를 이용하여 분석하였다. 연구결과: 본 실험의 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 치아 삭제 후 별도의 상아질 접착 시행 없이 임시수복하고, 레진 축조 전 상아질 접착을 도포 후 별도의 중합과정 없이 레진과 함께 중합할 경우, 상아질과의 미세인장 결합강도는 유의하게 낮은 값을 보였다 (P < .01). 2. 치아 삭제 및 임시 수복 기간 후, 상아질 접착제를 먼저 중합하고 복합 레진을 수복하는 경우와 치아 삭제 후 상아질 접착을 시행하고 수복물 장착 시 상아질 접착을 재시행하는 경우 간의 상아질에 대한 결합강도의 차이는 없었다 (P > .05).

Keywords

References

  1. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Simpson MD, Horner JA, Pashley DH, Caughman WF. Dentin permeability: sealing the dentin in crown preparations. Oper Dent 1992;17:13- 20
  2. Paul SJ, Scharer P. The dual bonding technique: a modified method to improve adhesive luting procedures. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1997;17:536-45
  3. Magne P. Immediate dentin sealing: a fundamental procedure for indirect bonded restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2005;17:144-55 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2005.tb00103.x
  4. Magne P, Kim TH, Cascione D, Donovan TE. Immediate dentin sealing improves bond strength of indrect restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:511-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.10.010
  5. Rubel BS. Impression materials: a comparative review of impression materials most commonly used in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 2007;51:629-42 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2007.03.006
  6. Magne P, Douglas WH. Porcelain veneers: dentin bonding optimization and biomimetic recovery of the crown. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:111-21
  7. McCabe JF, Rusby S. Dentine bonding - the effect of precuring the bonding resin. Br Dent J 1994;176:333-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4808447
  8. Dietschi D, Herzfeld D. In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing. Eur J Oral Sci 1998;106:1033-42 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
  9. Santos MJ, Navarro MF, Tam L, McComb D. The effect of dentin adhesive and cure mode on film thickness and microtensile bond strength to dentin in indirect restorations. Oper Dent 2005;30:50-7
  10. Bertschinger C, Paul SJ, Luthy H, Scharer P. Dual application of dentin bonding agents: effect on bond strength. Am J Dent 1996;9:115-9
  11. Magne P, So WS, Cascione D. Immediate dentin sealing supports delayed restoration placement. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:166-74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60052-3
  12. Dietschi D, Magne P, Holz J. Bonded to tooth ceramic restorations: in vitro evaluation of the efficiency and failure mode of two modern adhesives. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1995;105:299-305
  13. Forsten L. Curing depth of visible light-activated composites. Acta Odontol Scand 1984;42:23-8 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016358409041127
  14. DeWald JP, Ferracane JL. A comparison of four modes of evaluating depth of cure of light-activated composites. J Dent Res 1987;66:727-30 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660030401
  15. Tulunoglu O, Uctash M, Alacam A, Omurlu H. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glassionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique. Oper Dent 2000;25:292-8
  16. Yoon TH, Lee YK, Lim BS, Kim CW. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002;29:1165-73 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.2002.00970.x
  17. Okamoto M, Mine A, Watanabe K, Kawahara D, Yatani H. Porcelain veneer bonding to dentin and the curing performance of plasma-arc light with respect to porcelain thickness. Dent Mater J 2003;22:313-20 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.22.313
  18. Barghi N, McAlister EH. LED and halogen lights: effect of ceramic thickness and shade on curing luting resin. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;24:497-500, 502, 504
  19. Meng X, Yoshida K, Atsuta M. Hardness development of dual-cured resin cements through different thicknesses of ceramics. Dent Mater J 2006;25:132-7 https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.25.132
  20. Soares CJ, da Silva NR, Fonseca RB. Influence of the feldspathic ceramic thickness and shade on the microhardness of dual resin cement. Oper Dent 2006;31:384-9 https://doi.org/10.2341/05-51
  21. Jung H, Friedl KH, Hiller KA, Furch H, Bernhart S, Schmalz G. Polymerization efficiency of different photocuring units through ceramic discs. Oper Dent 2006;31:68-77 https://doi.org/10.2341/04-188
  22. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, Wei SH. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995;74:1168-78 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740050501
  23. Cho BH, Dickens SH, Bae JH, Chang CG, Son HH, Um CM. Effect of interfacial bond quality on the direction of polymerization shrinkage flow in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2002;27:297-304