대한치과보철학회지 (The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics)

  • 제46권5호
  • /
  • Pages.520-527
  • /
  • 2008
  • /
  • 0301-2875(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-3789(eISSN)
대한치과보철학회 (The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics)
권호 표지

레이저 처리가 상아질과 복합 레진의 결합에 미치는 영향

Effects of laser-irradiated dentin on shear bond strength of composite resin

  • 김성숙 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 박종일 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 이재인 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 김계순 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 원광치의학 연구소) ;
  • 조혜원 (원광대학교 치과대학 보철학교실, 원광치의학 연구소)
  • Kim, Sung-Sook (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Park, Jong-Il (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-In (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Kim, Gye-Sun (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Dentistry, Graduate School, Wonkwang University)
  • 발행 : 2008.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

목적: 이 연구는 산부식 대신 레이저로 표면처리를 하였을 때 복합레진과의 전단결합강도에 어떤 영향을 주는지 알아보기 위해 시행되었다. 재료 및 방법: 치아 우식증이 전혀 없는 건전한 최근에 발치된 대구치를 레진으로 매몰하고 상아질을 노출시킨 뒤 표면연마를 시행하 였다. 치아는 10개씩 4그룹으로 나누었다. 1) 아무 처리도 하지 않은 군, 2) 35% 인산으로 산부식한 군, 3) Er:YAG laser 레이저 처리된 군, 4) Er,Cr:YSGG laser로 처리된 군. 시편에 상아질 접착제 Single Bond2 (3M/ESPE)를 도포하고, 직경 3 mm, 높이 3 mm의 투명한 플라스틱관을 치아면 위에 두고 복합레진을 축성하였다. 모든 시편은 24시간동안 $37^{\circ}C$증류수에 보관 후 만능시험기를 이용하여 전단결합강도를 측정하였다. 결과: 레이저 처리시 각각 Er:YAG 레이저 처리는 $3.98{\pm}0.88$ MPa, Er,Cr:YSGG 레이저 처리는 $3.70{\pm}1.55$ MPa의 결합강도를 보였고, 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다. 아무 처리도 하지 않은 군의 결합강도는 $1.52{\pm}0.42$ MPa로 가장 낮은 결합강도를 나타내었고, 산처리를 한 군이 $7.10{\pm}1.86$ MPa로 가장 높은 전단결합강도를 보였으며, 이들은 레이저 처리한 군과 비교시 통계적으로 P < .001 유의수준에서 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 나타났다. 결론: 치아와 레진의 전단결합강도 비교시 레이저 처리는 아무 처리도 않은 군에 비해서는 높지만 인산 etching보다 그 결합력이 떨어진다.

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the shear bond strength of composite resin to dentin when etched with laser instead of phosphoric acid. Material and methods: Recently extracted forty molars, completely free of dental caries, were embedded into acrylic resin. After exposing dentin with diamond saw, teeth surface were polished with a series of SiC paper. The teeth were divided into four groups composed of 10 specimens each; 1) no surface treated group as a control 2) acid-etched with 35%-phosphoric acid 3) Er:YAG laser treated 4) Er,Cr:YSGG laser treated. A dentin bonding agent (Adapter Single Bond2, 3M/ESPE) was applied to the specimens and then transparent plastic tubes (3 mm of height and diameter) were placed on each dentin. The composite resin was inserted into the tubes and cured. All the specimens were stored in distilled water at $37^{\circ}C$ for 24 hours and the shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine (Z020, Zwick, Germany). The data of tensile bond strength were statistically analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Duncan's test at ${\alpha}$= 0.05. Results: The bond strengths of Er:YAG laser-treated group was $3.98{\pm}0.88$ MPa and Er,Cr:YSGG laser-treated group showed $3.70{\pm}1.55$ MPa. There were no significant differences between two laser groups. The control group showed the lowest bond strength, $1.52{\pm}0.42$ MPa and the highest shear bond strength was presented in acid-etched group, $7.10{\pm}1.86$ MPa (P < .05). Conclusion: Laser-etched group exhibited significantly higer bond strength than that of control group, while still weaker than that of the phosphoric acid-etched group.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Moritz AF, Beer F, Goharkhay K, Schoop U, Strassl M. Oral Laser Application. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc 2006
  2. Goldman L, Hornby P, Meyer R, Goldman B. Impact of the laser on the dental caries. Nature 1964;203:417
  3. Miserendino LJ, Pick RM. Lasers in dentistry-Clinical application of the Nd:YAG laser. Quintessence publishing Co. Inc 199-216. 1995
  4. Tafomori S, Iwase T. Ultrastructural change of enamel exposed to a normal pulsed Nd:YAG laser. Caries Res 1995;29:513-20 https://doi.org/10.1159/000262123
  5. Yamamoto H, Sato K. Prevention of dental caries by acousto-optically Q-switched Nd:YAG laser irradiation. J Dent Res 1980;59:137 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345800590020801
  6. Lobene RR, Fine S. Interaction of laser radiation with oral hard tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:589-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90066-7
  7. Cox CJ, Pearson GJ, Palmer G. Preliminary in vitro investigation of the effects of pulsed Nd:YAG laser radiation on enamel and dentine. Biomaterials 1994;15:1145-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(94)90234-8
  8. Pogrel MA, Muff DF, Marshall GW. Structural changes in dental enamel induced by high energy continuous wave carbon dioxide laser. Lasers Surg Med 1993;13:89-96 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900130115
  9. McCormack SM, Fried D, Featherstone JD, Glena RE, Seka W. Scanning electron microscope observations of $CO_2$ laser effects on dental enamel. J Dent Res 1995;74:1702-8 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345950740101201
  10. Palamara J, Phakey PP, Orams HJ, Rachinger WA. The effect on the ultrastructure of dental enamel of excimer-dye, argon-ion and $CO_2$ lasers. Scanning Microsc 1992;6:1061- 71
  11. Wigdor H, Abt E. Ashrafi S, Walsh JT Jr. The effects of lasers on dental hard tissues. J Am Dent Assoc 1993;124:65-70
  12. Eversole LR. Rizoiu I, Kimmel AI.Pulpal response to cavity preparation by an erbium, chromium: YSGG laser-powered hydrokinetic system. J Am Dent Assoc 1997;128:1099-106 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1997.0367
  13. Liberman R, Segal TH, Nordenberg D, Serebro LI. Adhesion of composite materials to enamel: comparison between the use of acid and lasing as pretreatment. Lasers Surg Med 1984;4:323-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900040404
  14. Cooper LF, Myers ML, Nelson DG, Mowery AS. Shear strength of composite bonded to laser-pretreated dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1988;60:45-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90348-4
  15. Visuri SR. Gilbert JL. Wright DD. Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr. Shear strength of composite bonded to Er: YAG laserprepared dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:599-605 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750011401
  16. Moritz A, Schoop U, Goharkhay K, Szakacs S, Sperr W, Schweidler E, Wernisch J, Gutknecht N. Procedures for enamel and dentin conditioning: a comparison of conventional and innovation methods. J Esthet Dent 1998;10:84-93 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1998.tb00342.x
  17. Keller U, Hibst R. Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on dental hard substances: II. Light microscopic and SEM investigation. Lasers Surg Med 1989;9:345-51 https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.1900090406
  18. Kataumi M, Nakajima M, Yamada T, Tagami J. Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of Er:YAG laser irradiated dentin using dentin adhesive. Dent Mater J 1998;17:135-8
  19. Armengol V, Jean A, Marion D. Temperature rise during Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser ablation of dentin. J Endod 2000;26:138-41 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200003000-00002
  20. Kameyana A, Oda Y, Hirai Y, Kawada E, Takizawa M. Resin bonding to Er: YAGlaser-irradiated dentin: combined effects of pre-treatment with citric acid and glutaraldehyde. Eur J Oral Sci 2001;109:354-60 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00075.x
  21. Ishioka S, Caputo AA. Interaction between the dentinal smear layer and composite bond strengths. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:180-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90370-3
  22. Gwinnett AJ. Quantitative contribution of resin infiltration/ hybridization to dentin bonding. Am J Dent 1993;6:7- 9
  23. Eick JD. Smear layer-materials surface. Proc Finn Dent Soc 1992;88:225-42
  24. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;8:125-30 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90067-M
  25. van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. 1992;71:1530-40
  26. Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H. Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventiona l caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 1998;77:1404-14 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345980770060501
  27. Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW. Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er- YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 2001;17:340-6 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00092-0
  28. Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE. Interfacial micromorphology and shear bond strength of single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1997;13:316-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80102-9
  29. Arimoto N, Suauki A, Sakuma K, Kashiraha S, Yamada M, Senda A. Microstructural changes in dentin irradiated by Er:YAG laser. J Dent Res 1999;78:318
  30. Harima T, Fujitani M, Fujita H, Murakami A, Ohshima K, Shintani H. Adhesive propertisinous materials to laserd dentin: part 3 Treatment for structural defects and heat-denatulaced layer. Jpn J Conserv Dent 1999;42:78-8
  31. Nakabayashi N, Sami Y. Bonding of intact dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:1706-15 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091401
  32. De Munck J, van meerbeek B, Yudhira R, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Micro-tensile bond strength of two adhesives to Erbium:YAG lased vs. bur-cut enamel and dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2002;110:322-9 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.21281.x
  33. Benazzato P, Stefani A. The effect of Er:YAG laser treatment on dentin collagen: An SEM investigation. J Oral Laser Appl 2003;3:79-81